In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.
– Franklin D. Roosevelt
The U.S. Supreme Court claims it is currently deciding whether to get involved in the issue of homosexual marriage.
The specific issue at hand is the Defense of Marriage Act, passed in 1996 to protect marriage as between a man and a woman. Radical homosexuals are attempting to create an unlawful stir because part of the law bars them from receiving federal benefits heterosexual married couples receive, even in states where same sex marriage is considered “legal.”
Thirty-one of the 50 states have passed constitutional amendments banning homosexual marriage (which has never existed in the history of mankind), while nine states and Washington, D.C., have deceived themselves into thinking that they have defied God and the people by unlawfully passing homosexual marriage.
In every case, states that have implemented homosexual marriage have done so through unlawful measures.
For example, in New York, after Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed the Marriage Equality Act, the New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms (NYCF) filed a lawsuit against the state due to the “out of control political process that was willing to pass a bill regardless of how many laws and rules it violates.”
In Iowa, we saw judicial activism at its worst. The Iowa Supreme Court bypassed the voice of the people and forced homosexual marriage upon its citizens. The people of Iowa made their wishes known when in 2010, three of the activist justices were voted out of office.
Massachusetts, home of radical homosexual Barney Frank, was the first state to “pass” homosexual marriage. It was manipulated through the un-Judicial Court of Massachusetts (again bypassing the people), and immediately thereafter efforts began to overturn this decision by amending the state’s constitution.
Washington, D.C., was also sued after Mayor Adrian Fenty signed a bill passed by the Council of the District of Columbia. The suit came about after the D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics refused to approve a ballot initiative on same-sex marriage.
Now the United States Supreme Court is considering whether to review a challenge to California’s ban on homosexual marriage. Seven million California voters made their voice heard that they were in agreement with “the laws of Nature and Nature’s God,” banning homosexual marriage. Radical homosexual activists got involved and circumvented the people, bringing the case before a radical homosexual judge, Vaughn Walker, who overturned Prop 8. Walker is no longer on the bench. In any case, the court was right where they wanted it.
The stage has been set – and just in time. Before the November elections, Obama came out in support of homosexual marriage. Of course, he first had to repeal the military’s DADT policy and place a few minions in key positions … such as the Supreme Court … before he made his announcement.
Such a one is Elena Kagan.
Elena Kagan is the former dean of students at Harvard. Contrary to Harvard’s founding mottos, “For Christ and the Church” and “For the Glory of Christ,” Kagan is known for “Queerifying Harvard.”
During her tenure, she did the following:
Kagan hired former ACLU lawyer William Rubenstein to teach “queer” legal theory, in which he taught courses on taking up new identities such as bisexuality, transgender f**k, and involving polygamy, sadomasochism and the sexuality of minors.
Kagan also hired other radicals (a lesbian and a transsexual) to teach transgender law courses, as well as Cass Sunstein who has written in support of polygamy and free-for-all marriage relationships.
Kagan viciously attacked our military in opposition to “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” even banning military recruiters from campus. Kagan’s attempt to ban the recruiters was unsuccessful, and even after losing her legal campaign, she encouraged students to continue protesting them.
Kagan’s radical activism on campus was so toxic that there was even a campaign to make the entire university trans-inclusive, using Harvard’s “gender identity” non-discrimination policy to spew gender confusion among students on campus.
Elena Kagan had never judged a case a day in her life, yet Obama, unqualified for office himself, has seen fit to “qualify” her on the Supreme Court bench – just in time for the Court to review homosexual marriage.
The push for sexual deviancy has been long in the making. The sexual revolution dates back to the late 1940s when homosexual icon Alfred Kinsey published what is known as the Kinsey Reports.