Fairness, Equality, and the new “Transparency Czar”

Written by:

Published on: September 11, 2015

One fact about the left that will never change is their inability to present issues in an honest way. Every view they take is thrust upon the American people as the only fair and equitable position any “reasonable” person could have. To argue with a liberal can only mean that you want the most vulnerable in our society to die. During the Obamacare debate, Florida Rep. Alan Grayson said the Republican alternative was for people to die quickly. When the GOP has concerns about the fact that Planned Parenthood has been exposed for harvesting baby parts, well, that’s just because we don’t want women to receive health care services. Did you know that harvesting aborted baby parts was considered a health care service? Nope, neither did I. So how are they able to get away with this time and time again? Well, let’s take a look. Here is President Obama in his own words.

Ah yes, the whole “transparency” thing, that’s the ticket! Now I know what you’re thinking, everything he just said is a complete lie, and you would be correct Let’s start with the claim that he has “put in place the toughest ethics laws, and the toughest transparency rules in history.” This would be akin to a Saturday Night Live skit were it not for the serious consequences of this bold face lie. It harkens back to the days of Adolph Hitler and the big lie technique. In his book Mein Kampf, Hitler used this as a means for convincing the German people that the Jews were the true culprits in Germany’s loss in WWI. Much in the same way that modern day Democrats do, Hitler accused the Jews of using this propaganda technique to blame German Army officer Erich Ludendorff for the loss. In reality, it was Hitler himself who was using the “big lie” to create the setting for the “Final Solution.” And for all the liberals out there wetting themselves right now, please save your faux outrage, Democrat Steve Cohen used the same analogy when describing opponents of Obamacare.

The President went on to say, “For the first time since our founding, the American people will know when lobbyists visit the Whitehouse.” At the time, this was supposed to serve as the ultimate proof that he was indeed serious about being transparent. This was all a part of that whole “hope & change” thing we kept hearing about. So how did that turn out you ask? Let’s hear what his friends in the liberal media had to say once the truth finally came out.

See now, that’s weird! It’s almost as if the wizard of smart was Barack Clinton instead of Obama. While technically correct, the American people would know the names of the lobbyists who visited the Whitehouse, he failed to mention that his administration would be instead meeting with them down the street. Certainly he just forgot to mention that part…right? The man who has racked up over 8 trillion dollars in debt, also told his obedient followers that it was time to “rein in exploding deficits that we’ve been accumulating.” How is that going Mr. President? Talk about the big lie! This President has tripled the national debt, with no end in sight.

Perhaps the biggest lie in his speech came when he promised the American people that they would be able to view every bill online for 5 days before it’s voted on in Congress. Although I will give him credit for being consistent as not one single bill has met this criteria, but once again, it’s all a lie. Look no further than Nancy Pelosi’s famous statement, “we have to pass the bill to find out what’s in it,” in regards to Obamacare. How’s that for transparency?

And now here we are. We have the top candidate on the left, who also happened to serve as the Secretary of State in the “most transparent” administration in history, caught in the act of hiding her emails on a private server. So how do they address this? That’s right; this week they appointed a transparency czar to investigate Hillary Clinton. Current Secretary of State John Kerry named Janice Jacobs to the post, apparently unaware that she had donated the maximum allowable amount to…that’s right…Hillary Clinton’s campaign. When confronted by the AP for this obvious conflict of interest, State Department spokesman John Kirby said he could not say whether Kerry was aware of the donation, but the appointment was a “testament to a commitment to transparency.” Only in liberal looney land could a statement like that be read with a straight face.

Here’s the bottom line. Anytime a leader of a country is able to convince a large percentage of its citizens that up is down, things never end well…for anybody. Fairness, equality, and transparency are all just words. They’re used to evoke emotions in people to help push forward an agenda. At the end of the day, we only need to ask one question. If this is really the most transparent administration in history, then why do we need a transparency czar? The answer to that question is obvious to many, but will always elude those who blindly follow the liberal philosophy. Never forget that with a leftist, the ends justifies the means, therefore a lie really isn’t such a bad thing after-all.

Don't forget to like SonsOfLibertyMedia.com on Facebook, Google+, & Twitter.
The opinions expressed in each article are the opinions of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect those of SonsOfLibertyMedia.com.
Check out Sons of Liberty Polls on LockerDome on LockerDome
Comment via Facebook
Comment via Disqus

Send this to friend