Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Fake Feminist Linda Sarsour: A “Good Muslim” Can’t Commit Sexual Assault

Written by:

Published on: December 19, 2017

The facts at hand presumably speak for themselves, but a trifle more vulgarly, I suspect, than facts even usually do.

Asmi Fathelbab, a former employee of the Arab American Association in New York when feminist heroine Linda Sarsour was its executive director, has accused Sarsour of dismissing her claims of sexual assault and harassment and following through on threats to destroy Fathelbab’s attempts to get a job if she didn’t retract the charges.

Sarsour, says Fathelbab, “oversaw an environment unsafe and abusive to women. Women who put [Sarsour] on a pedestal for women’s rights and empowerment deserve to know how she really treats us.”

Fathelbab charges Majed Seif, a Muslim who lived in the building that also housed the Arab American Association’s offices, “would sneak up on me during times when no one was around, he would touch me, you could hear me scream at the top of my lungs. He would pin me against the wall and rub his crotch on me. It was disgusting. I ran the youth program in the building and with that comes bending down and talking to small children. You have no idea what it was like to stand up and feel that behind you. I couldn’t scream because I didn’t want to scare the child in front of me. It left me shaking.”

But Sarsour had no interest in, or patience for, Fathelbab’s allegations.

“She called me a liar because ‘Something like this didn’t happen to women who looked like me. How dare I interrupt her TV news interview in the other room with my ‘lies.’…She told me he had the right to sue me for false claims…. She told me I’d never work in NYC ever again for as long as she lived. She’s kept her word. She had me fired from other jobs when she found out where I worked. She has kept me from obtaining any sort of steady employment for almost a decade.”

Fathelbab got no more sympathetic a hearing from the president of the Arab American Association’s board of directors, Ahmed Jaber.

“Jaber told me my stalker was a ‘God-fearing man’ who was ‘always at the Mosque,’ so he wouldn’t do something like that. He wanted to make it loud and clear this guy was a good Muslim and I was a bad Muslim for ‘complaining.’”

Another individual who was familiar with Sarsour, Fathelbab, Seif and the entire situation said: “It’s always going to be the woman’s fault over there. And Sarsour was there to protect the men. She’s not for other women. The only women she’s for is for herself.”

Another added: “Sarsour is only a feminist outwardly. Her interactions toward women in that building were atrocious. She would protect the patriarchy and in return they would promote her.”

Asmi Fathelbab’s accusations at the Arab American Association played out in full accord with Sharia.

In cases of sexual misbehavior (zina), only men can testify.

Women can’t testify at all, even in cases in which they were involved, and four male witnesses are required (Reliance of the Traveller, o24.9).

These witnesses must have seen the act itself. Consequently, it is very difficult to convict men of zina.

As long as they deny the charge and there aren’t four witnesses, they will get off scot-free, because the woman’s testimony is inadmissible.

Even worse, if a woman accuses a man, she may end up incriminating herself.

And so it was with Asmi Fathelbab. Now that she has come forward, expect Sarsour to react yet again in accord with the tried-and-true Islamic supremacist practice of claiming that Fathelbab is motivated by “hatred,” and that the whole thing is another “Islamophobic,” “racist” conspiracy designed to bring down a proud, hijab-wearing “Palestinian” Muslima.

And feminists will almost certainly fall for it again, hook, line and sinker. That Linda Sarsour is lionized as a feminist heroine, instead of identified as the promoter and enabler of Sharia oppression of women that she is, is an indication of how entranced by fantasy our public discourse has become.

Article posted with permission from Robert Spencer

Sign-up to get breaking alerts from Sons of Liberty Media

Don't forget to like SonsOfLibertyMedia.com on Facebook, Google+, & Twitter.
The opinions expressed in each article are the opinions of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect those of SonsOfLibertyMedia.com.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

  • scott

    so now liberals determine who is a good muzscum now?

  • drbhelthi

    The Moslem-male, protective philosophy presented by Linda Sansour was the subconscious motivation that triggered Minneapolis “policeman”, Mohamed Noor to spontaneously murder Justine Damond on July 15.

    Damond had called 911 to report a possible sexual assault in the alley behind her home. Dressed in pajamas, she approached the driver side of the police car. Seeing a female at night in PJs without a head covering, Noor fired out the window, multiple times, striking Damond in the abdomen, murdering her. Noor´s Moslem-male-administered punitive action against Ms. Damond qualifies him for equal treatment. Three rounds to his abdomen would be his “just deserves”.

    The recent mouthings of police chief, Harteau, that Ms. Damond “didn´t have to die” are meaningless. Minneapolis leadership “didn´t have to” place a Moslem male on its police force. Minneapolis leadership “didn´t have to” create fanfare as though they had done a good deed, instead of having insulted the American citizenry of Minnesota.

    The “leadership” of Minneapolis is qualified for the charge of violation of immigration law for declaring Minneapolis to be a “sanctuary” city. Hopefully, all supportive funds will be withheld and federal charges will be levied against Mohammed Noor, the Minneapolis administration and the state governor.

  • unbridled

    The dirty rag head says: A “Good Muslim” Can’t Commit Sexual Assault….
    Well, in that case, their must not be many “Good Muslims” because a great number of them are doing just that. And your cook book for success, the koran, also says that lying to further the islamic cause is acceptable. Guess what? Your busted b!tch….

Send this to a friend