False Flags, Racial Strife and the Call for Crisis Actors

Written by:

Published on: July 11, 2016

By Psychopolitics our goals are effectively carried forward. To produce a maximum amount of chaos in the culture of the enemy is our first most important step. Our fruits are grown in chaos, distrust, economic depression and scientific turmoil. At least a weary populace can seek peace only in our offered Communist State, at last only Communism can resolve the problems of the masses. Beria-Brainwashing: A Synthesis of the Russian Textbook on Psychopolitics.

There’s another reason for working inside the system. Dostoevski said that taking a new step is what people fear most. Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and chance the future. This acceptance is the reformation essential to any revolution. Alinsky- Rules for Radicals

Americans are slowly awakening to the incessant corruption which permeates Washington D.C. In usual fashion, a major crisis erupted just in time to draw attention away from Hillary Clinton and FBI Director James Comey.  The Dallas police massacre shifts the narrative and puts gullible Americans in a position where they see no other option but to demand more security from the government. This, of course, is exactly what the government wants. Order out of chaos, or the Hegelian Dialectic, is the age old formula for the establishment of world government.  Many people are beginning to believe that the mass shootings and racial riots we’ve been witness to are deliberately staged events, false flags if you will, designed to instill fear in the population and justify the creation of centrally controlled government. While this is generally viewed as a “crazy conspiracy theory,” there is ample evidence not only from the past, but connected to recent events which suggests nothing is as it seems.

A Brief History of False Flag Events

What exactly is a false flag event? Well, generally speaking, it is an attack conducted against yourself under the flag of your enemy, hence the name false flag. The purpose is to bring the nation into a war that the population may otherwise oppose. By giving the impression the nation is under siege, the will of the populace can be easily manipulated into accepting war. False Flag attacks are almost always discredited as conspiracy theory. The Reichstag Fire in Nazi Germany, for example, was said to be a false flag. Adolf Hitler blamed the fire on communists and used it as justification to unleash the Brown Shirts against all that opposed him.  The United States has a history of false flag operations as well, and before you start throwing the term conspiracy theory around; consider the fact that these events have been declassified. For instance, the Gulf of Tonkin incident of 1964, where Vietnamese Patrol boats allegedly attacked a U.S. warship, has recently been proven to have never happened.  Rather, it was a fabricated story designed to bring us into the Vietnam War. In fact, it was also revealed that the U.S. Government knew this to be the case as early as 1968. This information was declassified in 2010. Another big false flag operation which almost took place was Operation Northwood.  This was a plan devised by the Joint of Chiefs of Staff, in order to stage fake terror attacks on the American people and blame it on Cuba in order to justify a U.S. invasion. Let’s not forget that Cuba is a communist nation that murdered and enslaved its own people; however, what this plan called for wasn’t any better.  According to the Northwood document, it was imperative that the U.S. act against Cuba before there was any long-term defense agreements made between the Island nation and the Soviet Union.  The following is a passage from the Northwood document.

Such a plan would enable a logical build up of incidents to be combined with other seemingly unrelated events to camouflage the ultimate objective and create the necessary impression of Cuban rashness and irresponsibility on a large scale, directed at other countries as well as the United States.

Thankfully, this plan was rejected, but it goes to show what lengths our government is willing to go to in order to get what it wants. This plan was declassified in 1997. Finally, we have the attack on Pearl Harbor. A recently declassified memo suggests Franklin Roosevelt was warned of an impending Japanese attack three days prior to it happening. It has also been revealed that President Roosevelt cut off U.S. oil supplies to Japan in order to provoke them, and that a portion of the U.S. fleet had been deliberately ordered to Pearl Harbor to await destruction, with the hopes of stirring the American people into supporting our entry into World War II.

The Report from Iron Mountain

Often discredited as a hoax, the Report from Iron Mountain presents some peculiar information pertaining to events that we are witnessing today, particularly concerning global warming and race relations. What is The Report from Iron Mountain? After the Cold War and the supposed fall of communism, there was no longer a visible threat to global peace. The Global Elite operate and maintain control on the basis of fear and instability; again, the application of the problem-reaction-solution strategy.  In order to maintain and guide the population to their desired ends, there needed to be some kind of threat present in the minds of the populace. For instance, on pages 53 and 54, you can find the following paragraphs.

When it comes to postulating a credible substitute for war capable of directing human behavior patterns in behalf of social organization, few options suggest themselves. Like its political function, the motivational function of war requires the existence of a genuinely menacing social enemy. The principal difference is that for purposes of motivating basic allegiance, as distinct from accepting political authority, the “alternate enemy” must imply a more immediate, tangible, and directly felt threat of destruction. It must justify the need for taking and paying a “blood price” in wide areas of human concern. PP.53

In this respect, the possible enemies noted earlier would be insufficient. One exception might be the environmental-pollution model, if the danger to society it posed was genuinely imminent. The fictive models would have to carry the weight of extraordinary conviction, underscored with a not inconsiderable actual sacrifice of life; the construction of an up-to-date mythological or religious structure for this purpose would present difficulties in our era, but must certainly be considered. pp.54

It is also possible that the two functions considered under this heading may be jointly served, in the sense of establishing the antisocial, for whom a control institution is needed, as the “alternate enemy” needed to hold society together. The relentless and irreversible advance of unemployability at all levels of society, and the similar extension of generalized alienation from accepted values may make some such program necessary even as an adjunct to the war system. As before, we will not speculate on the specific forms this kind of program might take, except to note that there is again ample precedent, in the treatment meted out to disfavored, allegedly menacing, ethnic groups in certain societies during certain historical periods. pp.54

These three paragraphs sum it up nicely, there needs to be a menacing threat to society in order to implement the type of control these people wish to impose upon us. The ideas of using an “environmental-pollution” model are discussed, which pertains to the global warming scam and, more interestingly, to the idea of using unemployability and a menacing ethnic group that fails to adhere to normal societal values of which, according to the authors of this report, there is already ample evidence suggesting this model works. Did you read that? Black Lives Matter, as many of us already suspect, is a group deliberately created and funded for the purpose of bringing society into chaos to make the masses beg for government solutions.

White Privilege

For years now, our education system has been deliberately creating racial strife by teaching blacks that they are oppressed and whites that they are inherently racist and privileged. This author knew from the moment he heard the words “white privilege” during his social work education that there was an agenda to deliberately divide the nation and create racial warfare. What do you think the results will be of teaching blacks that they are the victims of a society which systematically discriminates against them because it was created only for the benefit and privileges of white people? Whites are being beaten down with the nonsense that they are born racist and they unknowingly discriminate against minorities, while blacks are being taught to be revolutionary activists. The result is a generation of white people afraid to speak out and made vulnerable to the hostilities of minorities that are taught to hate them.  The very premise of white privilege education itself is racist because to believe that one race has privilege over you or is somehow better than you is to be filled with self loathing and self doubt. In other words, the left is pushing a belief based on evolutionary theory that suggests black people are not as capable as white people and that, in order to survive, they need the hand of an all-powerful government giving them handouts. What this has done in reality is destroy the initiative of generations of blacks, who are now so dependent on government welfare that they blindly vote for the ones who keep them in this state of dependence. The Report from Iron Mountain suggests that the creation of the voter class, or generations of government dependency, was done on purpose in order for a community organizer like Obama to bring them under his umbrella and turn them into a revolutionary army that would create the necessary chaos needed to secure total government control.

Further Proof

People have been questioning the narratives of the recent mass shootings and racial riots we have been witnessing, and with good reason. For instance, FBI crime stats for 2012 show that no murders took place in Newtown, Connecticut, in 2012, the year of the alleged Sandy Hook shootings. Other reports suggest that these numbers were recorded with other agencies; however, whether they were or not, you have to question why the FBI is not listing them. Secondly, a lot of articles appear, suggesting that many people present during these shootings, or people that are allegedly killed during terrorist attacks, later show up at another crisis event to become another victim. For instance, a man known as Alfonso was allegedly killed in The Egypt Air Crash, The Pulse Night Club Shootings, and the Atatürk Airport in Istanbul. Yes, this is of course a crazy conspiracy theory; however, there is evidence suggesting that there is a use of “crisis actors” in these events.  Recently, ads on Craig’s List have been showing up recruiting crisis actors for so called training simulations. For example, before the July 7 rampage in Dallas, there was an ad depicting a need for crisis actors in Houston on July 4th. While nothing happened on this day it is suspicious that the event that unfolded in Dallas was only a mere three days later. Is it possible that these ads are deliberately placed with false dates in order to discredit conspiracy theorists? Well, if you know anything about the topic of Ideological Subversion, the answer to that question would be yes! Another Craig’s List ad has appeared, asking for the use of crisis actors at the end of July in Vermont. Ironically, the dates align with the Planned Democratic National Convention. For months, the media have been conditioning the public to the possibility of violence at both the Democratic and Republican National Conventions.

Are these recruitment ads the proof which suggests that all of this is deliberately orchestrated to create the needed chaos that would ensure the masses demand more government control? Is Black Lives Matter the “genuinely menacing social enemy” mentioned in the Report from Iron Mountain? If so, it is safe to say that the public is currently being prodded into reacting in a manner which would justify the government implementation of martial law. If nothing comes to fruition at the Democratic convention, be on the watch for something in the vicinity at a later date.

Don't forget to like SonsOfLibertyMedia.com on Facebook, Google+, & Twitter.
The opinions expressed in each article are the opinions of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect those of SonsOfLibertyMedia.com.
Check out Sons of Liberty Polls on LockerDome on LockerDome
Comment via Facebook
Comment via Disqus