Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

“McMuellerism” Parallels McCarthyism

Written by:

Published on: August 5, 2017

It appears the Democrats and their ilk learned well from Joseph McCarthy.  With scant evidence, at times almost none, McCarthy set out to “expose” communists within

With scant evidence, at times almost none, McCarthy set out to “expose” communists within government who were believed to be undermining the republic by passing secrets to the Soviets during the Cold War era.  While being a communist was not a crime, McCarthy used the act of subversion to prosecute Americans for selling secrets to the Soviets.  Americans had already witnessed cases of communist spies compromising America – the most famous being Julius and Ethel Rosenberg.  His “exuberance” to secure the republic then extended to the film industry where numerous Hollywood associated individuals were targeted based on suspicions of having communist ties.  In order to “root out” communism in America, McCarthy used controversial techniques and issued inflammatory accusations with little evidence.

While being a communist was not a crime, McCarthy used the act of subversion to prosecute Americans for selling secrets to the Soviets.  Americans had already witnessed cases of communist spies compromising America – the most famous being Julius and Ethel Rosenberg.  His “exuberance” to secure the republic then extended to the film industry where numerous Hollywood associated individuals were targeted based on suspicions of having communist ties.  In order to “root out” communism in America, McCarthy used controversial techniques and issued inflammatory accusations with little evidence.

Americans had already witnessed cases of communist spies compromising America – the most famous being Julius and Ethel Rosenberg.  His “exuberance” to secure the republic then extended to the film industry where numerous Hollywood associated individuals were targeted based on suspicions of having communist ties.  In order to “root out” communism in America, McCarthy used controversial techniques and issued inflammatory accusations with little evidence.

His “exuberance” to secure the republic then extended to the film industry where numerous Hollywood associated individuals were targeted based on suspicions of having communist ties.  In order to “root out” communism in America, McCarthy used controversial techniques and issued inflammatory accusations with little evidence.

In order to “root out” communism in America, McCarthy used controversial techniques and issued inflammatory accusations with little evidence.

As it turns out, the release of the Verona Intercepts in 1995, as well as archived Kremlin data, vindicated McCarthy;  however, his techniques in trying to discover the information became the crux upon which detractors eventually discredited him.  Moreover, politicians at the time, as well as President Harry S. Truman, Lyndon B. Johnson, and Edward R.

Moreover, politicians at the time, as well as President Harry S. Truman, Lyndon B. Johnson, and Edward R. Murrow, were prominent McCarthy detractors, ushering in his downfall.

What does all this have to do with the current political climate in America today?  McCarthy engaged in a search to root out an ideology anathema to the republic of the

McCarthy engaged in a search to root out an ideology anathema to the republic of the united States of America to secure government in the hands of the people.  The political machine eventually brought him down.

Today, the political machine is hard at work to undermine a constitutionally elected president in Donald J. Trump over accusations that have zero evidence, brought by the Democratic National Committee (DNC), Hillary Clinton, and “the deep state,” confirmed by “high confidence” of deep state agencies through unnamed sources.

While McCarthy sought to secure government in the hands of the people, Mueller, McMasters, hold-over Obama sycophants, “the deep state,” Democrats and many Republicans seek to subvert the republican form of government

The political machine eventually brought him down.  Today, the political machine is hard at work to undermine a constitutionally elected president in Donald J. Trump over accusations that have zero evidence, brought by the Democratic National Committee (DNC), Hillary Clinton, and “the deep state,” confirmed by “high confidence” of deep state agencies through unnamed sources.  While McCarthy sought to secure government in the hands of the people, Mueller, McMasters, hold-over Obama sycophants, “the deep state,” Democrats and many Republicans seek to subvert the republican form of government

Today, the political machine is hard at work to undermine a constitutionally elected President in Donald J. Trump over accusations that have zero evidence, brought by the Democratic National Committee (DNC), Hillary Clinton, and “the deep state,” confirmed by “high confidence” of deep state agencies through unnamed sources.  While McCarthy sought to secure government in the hands of the people, Mueller, McMasters, hold-over Obama sycophants, “the deep state,” Democrats and many Republicans seek to subvert the republican form of government

While McCarthy sought to secure government in the hands of the people, Mueller, McMasters, hold-over Obama sycophants, “the deep state,” Democrats and many Republicans seek to subvert the republican form of government instilled by the Constitution for the united States of America by unseating a president elected by the Electoral College, as established by the Constitution.

In other words, “McMuellerism” seeks to thwart the constitutional process by which a president is elected in order to set a precedent to “overthrow” a sitting president based on whether those in government accept the choice made by the Electoral College, which echoed the sentiments of the American public in this particular case.

Because of the CIA’s identification of individuals who theorize alternative motives for events as “conspiracy theorists,” the use of the legal term of “conspiracy” cannot be used so the substitute term with no legal basis of “collusion” is used instead.  Collusion may be unsavory behavior, but it is not criminal – conspiracy is.  Because of the use of a term that is not criminal,

Collusion may be unsavory behavior, but it is not criminal – conspiracy is.  Because of the use of a term that is not criminal,

Because of the use of a term that is not criminal, actual criminal behavior is overlooked, i.e. leaks of classified information, and almost condoned, in order to unseat a sitting president.  So, while McCarthy sought to oust an ideology that could result in subversion of a republican form of government, McMuellerism seeks to engage in actual subversion to where government has the final determination of who can occupy the office of the president instead of the Electoral College.

So, while McCarthy sought to oust an ideology that could result in subversion of a republican form of government, McMuellerism seeks to engage in actual subversion to where government has the final determination of who can occupy the office of the president instead of the Electoral College.

McMasters is purging those who support Trump from the White House national security council and gave Susan Rice continuing access to classified information in April.  He waived “the ‘need-to-know’ requirement on anything she viewed or received during her tenure as President Obama’s national security adviser.” Susan Rice has also been implicated for unmasking the names of “Trump transition aides in conversations with Russian officials.”  McMasters maintains that Rice has done nothing wrong.

Mueller has now impaneled a Grand Jury in his investigation of Russian “collusion” by the Trump administration during the election.

Remember, there has been no substantial evidence presented against the Trump campaign and collusion, while unsavory, is not criminal.  But, there is plenty of evidence to show criminal wrong-doing by the Clinton campaign, the DNC, and Democrats during the election and primary, Hillary Clinton’s tenure as the Secretary of State, and the Awan brothers.

Infowars reported that sources revealed to CNN that a possible prosecution could not be obtained by evidence (lack thereof) proving the Trump campaign “colluded” with Russia to “swing the election (which is supposedly the entire focus of the investigation)”;  however, it could be done by “proving past financial improprieties by Trump-owned business interests.”

This not only underscores how the entire investigation, which now involves a Grand Jury, is a pure witch hunt, but also how Mueller almost certainly knows that there is no clear evidence of Russian collusion with which to nail Trump.

“Sources described an investigation that has widened to focus on possible financial crimes, some unconnected to the 2016 elections,” reports CNN.

If any investigations should be conducted into financial crimes, especially those unconnected to the 2016 elections, a grand jury should be impaneled to explore Hillary Clinton, the Clinton Foundation, the Clinton Global Initiative, the Uranium One deal, and various members of Congress and the DNC.

Likewise, investigations need to occur into the numerous leaks of President Trump’s conversations with various world leaders.

There is not anyone in this republic who would not love to hear the conversations Obama and members of his administration had with various world leaders, including the nations of Iran, Iraq, Russia, Mexico, Cuba, etc.

Yet, those are held in the highest confidence by the former Obama administration as not privileged for the public and exposure considered unlawful.

Trump’s, on the other hand, are considered up for grabs as to who can leak it first to the press, considering it lawful to do so.

But, with Obama sycophants and die-hard subversives still permeating the Trump administration, anything and everything is considered “up for grabs” in the “ends justifies the means” mentality to overturn a constitutional process for the election of this president.

While being born after the era of McCarthyism and learning about that time in American history from school, literature, additional research and memories of family members, the parallels between that era and the new era of McMuellerism cannot escape this writer.

While McCarthy was eventually vindicated, his techniques have been the subject of criticism for the better part of 50 years and his investigation dubbed a “witch hunt.”

Likewise, Mueller’s “technique” being used in the investigation into the “nothing burger” of Trump “collusion” with Russia to shift into “whatever it can find” to unseat a constitutionally elected president is a true “witch hunt” aided by paranormal paranoia of the Washington, DC swamp, which would be enviable by occupants of 1600s Salem if they were alive, and indicates “subversion” of the Constitution for the united States of America by the government created by it through consent of the people.

The era of McMuellerism could make the era of McCarthyism look like kindergarten sandbox play.

Sign-up to get breaking alerts from Sons of Liberty Media

Don't forget to like SonsOfLibertyMedia.com on Facebook, Google+, & Twitter.
The opinions expressed in each article are the opinions of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect those of SonsOfLibertyMedia.com.

Comment via Facebook
Comment via Disqus

Send this to a friend