Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Never Before Seen Footage: Ted Cruz Speaks About His Wife’s Connection to the Council on Foreign Relations

Written by:

Published on: March 28, 2015

Anyone who is familiar with Ted Cruz and the CFR has probably heard his famous “pernicious nest of snakes” assessment of the Council on Foreign Relations.

For those who study the globalists, like myself, there would be little argument with his opinion.

For those of you who follow a more beaten path, let me just spell it out for you. Those of us who research these things see the Council on Foreign Relations as an extension of the New World Order.

Whether you choose to swallow that pill, or not, is somewhat irrelevant. Watch the organization closely and you will see it follows a primarily leftist agenda. For instance, most recently the organization came out in support of more gun control, implying that guns in the U.S. were causing the violence in Latin America.

What?

This is what the CFR does. They push leftist issues. So Cruz would naturally be against them as a self-anointed defender of the Constitution.

There is only one problem with Ted’s disdain for the CFR. Ted’s wife Heidi is a former member. Don’t expect any big conservative media sources to cover this story. If Cruz looks like a threat, as 2016 nears, the story might surface in the mainstream liberal media.

But how do we get the answers if no one can ask the questions?

Even conservatives want the answers. Conservatives want to make sure they are backing the right candidate.

I found a video yesterday that might help. Cruz is given ample opportunity to explain the situation and the viewer can make their own decisions based on his words.

A blogger/activist/citizen journalist named Derrick Broze ran into Cruz when he was running for Senate and was granted an interview. During the course of that interview, Broze asked the question that so many of us have wanted the media to ask.

In 2012, Ted Cruz was running for his Senate position and attended a Straw Poll in Texas to build support for his campaign. I had the opportunity to question him about his wife’s connections to the Council on Foreign Relations.

Broze released the interview yesterday. Try to put all previous biases aside, including Broze’s words about how well “coached” Cruz was. That is simply his subjective opinion.Judge for yourself and see if you think Ted’s explanation is sufficient.

What is his take on Heidi’s involvement with the Council on Foreign Relations?

Here you go:


What do you think?

Source

Sign-up to get breaking alerts from Sons of Liberty Media

Don't forget to like SonsOfLibertyMedia.com on Facebook, Google+, & Twitter.
The opinions expressed in each article are the opinions of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect those of SonsOfLibertyMedia.com.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

  • ron44

    lets see how much the rest are connected to the COFR ..i hear that Romney was labeled the same and no one questioned the left on this. Romney lost..so what gives when the rest can’t seem to appear on any videos.

  • Linda

    I support Ted Cruz. Perhaps someone should ask his wife how she feels about the Counsel on Foreign Relation. People can change. This is a bunch of Bull !

  • JCLincoln

    If his wife was in the CFR pushing for conservatives issues and trying to make it a more people representative organization rather than an elitist supporting organization, then I need to applaud that.
    The fact that she was only in the CFR a short time, probably not being successful in her attempts, is a plus for her, leaving when she saw she couldn’t affect any change there.
    Cruz should discuss this also, beyond just saying she pushed for more conservatism. Either way however, he’s going to be attacked………..why……..because the communists (I mean democrats) are a bunch of dogs.

  • Web Watchers

    cfr distractions aside – – – –

    natural born citizen: one who is born of two citizens of the country. the facts show the current elected potus is not and the facts show cruz is not. patriots need to end their hypocrisy and find a constitutional qualified candidate.

  • drbhelthi

    Hopefully, an insider will VERY SOON reveal that Mr. Ted Cruz and his wife are carefully selected puppets of the Carlyle Group. Cruz´s somewhat american family history appeals to foreigners residing in the US, and his wife´s position among big-business elites signals her allegiance. Not only her allegiance. Facts are often distressing. Perhaps that´s one reason the MSM, especially the USGOV, hides them.

  • drbhelthi

    Agreed. Your comment is a bunch of bull.

  • Jillian5512

    Ok, so if Cruz somehow indirectly works for the CFR via his wife (who resigned from the position) who do we vote for? Rand Paul, who sticks to Mitch McConnell like glue? He doesn’t support repeal of Obamacare, just “fix and replace it” which isn’t getting rid of it and lets fed govt keep power over healthcare. (His daddy isn’t running, as far as I know). Scott Walker, who is good at union-busting and done good things, but doesn’t support full repeal of the socialistic Obamacare? Mike Lee? Lee’s a good guy, but not outspoken enough and probably unelectable. What about Ted Nugent? Hey, I’d vote for him. At least he’s for gun rights, unlike Ben Carson, who thinks guns are icky. So who do we vote for?

  • Conservatarian

    The right is attacking him about this, too. The thought that someone might win the White House and possibly reduce the size of government is giving both sides agita.

  • Kimberly Williams Johnson

    Fact: the founders never defined “natural born citizen” and neither has anyone since. There is no agreed upon definition and until there is, there will be argument about it. I think the term “natural born citizen” means someone who was a U.S. citizen from birth. Does that mean my understanding of the term is right and yours is wrong? Of course not! It also doesn’t mean that your understanding is right and mine is wrong.

  • Ken Stroud

    I don’t have to read all of this article to say that the Council on Foreign Relations to understand that it is an insidious organization as part of the New World Order.

  • drbhelthi

    Hello Jillian5512. Each qualified voter has the right to make the decision, whom to vote for.
    I can only think of a few wannabes whom I would NOT vote for. When we look at the occupants of the POTUS slot since James Earl Carter – – not at all encouraging.

  • JCLincoln

    Yeah, ain’t it great?
    BTW – you do know the income tax is illegal, don’t you?
    That’s one way that we can help reduce federal power, by starving them of their food.
    I do already.

  • Web Watchers

    brilliant how you summarize the obvious about the controversy of natural born citizen. the way you don’t state something, it is clear what conclusion you don’t agree with.

    the point is that you can’t have one definition with one person (the elected) yet ignore the same definition with another (the candidate).

    and where “the founders never define,” that is why history and terminology must be researched, as it is also obvious that they felt no need to define a term where no definition was codified because they all knew what “natural born citizen” meant when they wrote it.

  • http://FreedomOutpost.com/ Tim Brown

    actually they did in the 1790 naturalization act and … well, cruz doesn’t fit that definition.

  • http://FreedomOutpost.com/ Tim Brown

    but they can’t change their natural born citizenship status.

  • Web Watchers

    TIM. THANK YOU!!!

  • Lauri

    We need a VETERAN!

  • Kimberly Williams Johnson

    Okay, I’ll give you that……but then the Naturalization Act of
    1795 repealed and replaced the Naturalization Act of 1790. Then that act was, itself, repealed in
    1802. So, there is no current definition
    of what a natural born citizen is. I
    disagree with your definition, and you disagree with mine. Until there is an acting definition, there
    will be disagreements. I think Ted Cruz
    is eligible and would make a better president than any we’ve seen in recent
    decades.

Send this to a friend