We live in a time where we have two Antichrists emerge in our time, with one ruling the most powerful western nation, the U.S., and the other ruling the most powerful Muslim nation, Turkey. These two antichrists changed the world claiming that their legacies are to advance world peace when in reality these two caused peace to depart from the earth.
In Turkey, the worst position to be in is to be a free-thinking journalist while when it comes to Obama, the worst thing to be in our time is a Jew, a Christian or an Arab nationalist. Under Obama Arab nationalism is being wiped out for an Islamic utopia where Obama today is anti Al-Sisi of Egypt, anti-Bashar Al-Assad of Syria and pro-Muslim Brotherhood, pro-Turkey and pro-Iran gaining nuclear ability, while at the same time he could care less when it comes to being a Jew living in Israel, the man makes policy that cares less if the Jews suffer a final solution.
In the Atlantic Monthly, Jeffrey Goldberg, a Jew, interviews Antichrist Barack Hussein Obama on Tuesday afternoon, as President Obama was bringing an occasionally contentious but often illuminating hour-long conversation about the Middle East to an end, Goldberg brought up a persistent worry. “A majority of American Jews want to support the Iran deal,” said Goldberg, “but a lot of people are anxiety-ridden about this, as am I.” Being Jewish, Goldberg believed that it was prudent to keep nuclear weapons out of the hands of anti-Semitic regimes. Obama, who earlier in the discussion had explicitly labeled the supreme leader of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, an anti-Semite, responded with arguments Goldberg never heard Antichrist Obama ever make before.
As to the objection on why an anti-Semitic irrational Iran’s Ayatollah should have nuclear capability Obama answered:
“The fact that you are anti-Semitic, or racist, doesn’t preclude you from being interested in survival. It doesn’t preclude you from being rational about the need to keep your economy afloat; it doesn’t preclude you from making strategic decisions about how you stay in power; and so the fact that the supreme leader is anti-Semitic doesn’t mean that this overrides all of his other considerations.”
Just like a typical antichrist, taking Obama’s argument, Germany during Hitler, although Hitler was an anti-Semite, he deserves to build the Luftwaffe while Iran gains an ability to make all of Israel one whole crematorium. When did any American president ever believe that such vile Muslim leaders like the Ayatollah should gain a right to build anything, would never come out of the mouth of the most powerful man in the West?
Now when it comes to the most powerful man in the Muslim world, known in the Middle East as Sultan-Caliph Recep Erdogan, he is prosecuting free speech like never before during the Kemalist era. The latest example this week, Hürriyet daily, a Turkish newspaper reported that a death sentence was handed down to Morsi in Egypt on Saturday with an article on its website that included the headline, “World in shock: Death sentence to president who won 52 percent of the vote.”
But such a headline was a crime worthy of putting daily Editor-in-Chief Sedat Ergin and his assistants on trial. Why? Hürriyet’s headline, Erdogan argues, was suggestive, given that Erdoğan was also, like Morsi of Egypt, was elected with a 52 percent share of the vote in the August 2014 presidential election, that the headline suggested that he had been “threatened with the death penalty handed down to Morsi.”
Erdogan was suggesting that Hürriyet’s reference to “52%” would send the message that says: ‘Hey, if the man in Egypt was sent to the gallows after winning by 52% margin, so will Erdogan, since he too won by 52% margin in 2014.’
Antichrists, Stalins, Hitlers and all tyrants have one thing in common: Narcissistic Personality Disorder. But these (Obama and Erdogan) are Malignant narcissists since they go into a rage that psychiatrists appropriately call “narcissistic rage.” A Malignant narcissist will always “magnify himself” (Daniel 11:36-37) — to punish the persons or the world who refuse to recognize their superiority and reject their wonderfulness.
So as the Malignant Narcissist Obama hones in on Netanyahu, the other Malignant Narcissist, Erdogan files criminal complaints against editors of the mainstream Hürriyet Daily and its website over a headline that President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has claimed suggests he might share the same fate as Egypt’s ousted President Mohammed Morsi, who was sentenced to death by an Egyptian court over the weekend.
Lawyer Rahmi Kurt asked prosecutors to launch an investigation into Hürriyet daily Editor-in-Chief Sedat Ergin, Managing Director İzzet Doğan and the daily’s Internet editors for “inciting hatred and enmity,” “inciting people to armed rebellion against the government,” “praising the crime and the criminal,” and “spreading propaganda for a terrorist organization.” He also requested their arrest.
“Mr. President, what do you want from us?” the editorial retorted in defense of himself, adding: “Why are you attacking us with blatant injustice and clear distortions? Why are you turning us into a target? What do you want from us? Will you banish us?”
Criminal complaints were also filed against 27 people, including journalists, politicians and artists, for “inciting hatred and animosity in the public” and “inciting people to armed rebellion against the government” just for how these covered the story when during the March 31 hostage crisis that left a public prosecutor dead.
The two antichrists, Erdogan and Obama have everything in common besides narcissism. They both want Bashar Al-Assad gone. They both support that the Muslim Brotherhood should be reinstalled into power in Egypt. They both worked to end Arab nationalism in the Middle East and usher in an oxymoronic idea of Islamic democracy. They both defended Iran’s right to nuclear power. They both turned their backs on Saudi Arabia. They both hated Netanyahu and changed their nation’s policy from being Israel-friendly to turning their backs on Israel. They both communicate in Arabic and speak it fluently. Both of them, whenever the two give a speech, and the Quran is mentioned, both praise it, but whenever biblical issues are mentioned, they both degrade the Scriptures. Both stink to high heaven, and as we say in the Middle East, are a perfect match to being two butt-cheeks in one underwear.