Barack Obama’s latest federal nomination, Loretta Lynch, is just as bad as her predecessor Eric Holder. In a video of Lynch speaking in Long Beach, New York nine months ago, she declared that Voter ID laws in the “Deep South” states are racist.
Did she use those exact words? No, but the idea is most definitely there.
“I serve at the pleasure of the first African-American president of the United States of America,” she said to a round of applause.
She also thought it a wonderful thing to serve alongside Obama’s partner in crime, Eric Holder. Let’s not forget that she was also appointed as US attorney by criminal president Bill Clinton also.
One of the strangest things she said in reference to Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr’s “dream.” She said, “People tell us that dreams are not realized because dreams never are and he knew we had to continue working. I’d be remiss if I didn’t tell you that under this president and under this attorney general, the Department of Justice is committed to following through with those dreams.”
So, the dream won’t be realized, but you’re going to continue pursuing it. Do I have that right? What dream is Ms. Lynch after? Blacks and other minorities have equality in America. They can work. They can own a home. They can marry. They have all the same rights that whites have, so what is the dream Ms. Lynch is pursuing? It’s the same dream the sodomite community is pursuing: special rights.
“50 years after the march on Washington, 50 years after the civil rights movement, we stand in this country at a time when we see people trying to take back so much of what Dr. King fought for,” Lynch said. “We stand in this country. People try and take over the State House and reverse the goals that have been made in voting in this country.”
“But I’m proud to tell you that the Department of Justice has looked at these laws and looked at what’s happening in the Deep South, and in my home state of North Carolina has brought lawsuits against those voting rights changes that seek to limit our ability to stand up and exercise our rights as citizens,” she continued. “And those lawsuits will continue.”
This is just outright lying. The fact that Voter ID laws have been put into place was for the sole purpose of preventing voter fraud. It doesn’t matter if you are black, white, Hispanic or of Asian descent, you have to provide an ID. Does Lynch say anything about how blacks have to provide ID in order to purchase alcoholic beverages or firearms? Does she mention that if blacks want to drive they must have a driver’s license? Is she going to push for the fact that driver’s licenses and demanding ID for alcohol and firearms is racist? I’m guessing not because that would not go alongside her communist agenda, would it?
My opinion is that state governors should begin ignoring these lawsuits and just enforce the law.
While some have claimed the laws target minorities because they are considered “poor,” nothing could be further from the truth. As I have made mention of before, in my home state of South Carolina, which enforces Voter ID laws, I discovered that anyone over the age of 18 can receive a state identification card, suitable for voting absolutely free. I’m sure most states operate in a similar manner. The only reason to oppose Voter ID laws is because one is complicit in voter fraud.
Black conservative Dr. Ada Fisher, also from North Carolina refutes Lynch’s claims regarding voting laws, specifically the North Carolina voting law. She wrote, “This act is in no way a voter suppression effort as those who malign it have tried to define it. Every citizen can vote and is encouraged to do so with a series of outreach and educational efforts suggested for the county boards of election.”
Hans von Spakovsky of The Daily Signal pointed out the “irony of standing in front of a picture of Nelson Mandela while making this false claim against voter ID laws, given that South Africa has a much stricter voter ID requirement that was supported by Mandela.”
Von Spakovsky also gave evidence that Lynch believes the death penalty is also racist.
However, Lynch went on to continue the mantra of Eric Holder is saying the discipline of black students is also racist.
“But we also know that when we sit and look at schools that have zero-tolerance programs, they are often used,” Lynch continued. “And they take our babies, minority children, black children, Hispanic children, and they put them out of school before they have a chance to learn. So the Department of Justice this past year has gone into the South, although we’re looking further, and brought the first school-to-prison pipeline cases against school districts in Alabama.”
No one is putting “them out of school before they have a chance to learn.” If kids cannot conduct themselves properly and with dignity in school, then they need to be sent home where the authority in their lives resides to deal with them, not the teacher.
Furthermore, she tells on herself for being a racist. Not once does she include whites, does she?
However, this is just more covering for bad behavior and reiterating the asinine threats of Eric Holder, who cried “racism” because black students were suspended or expelled due to their violation of school policies.
Holder was quoted as saying, “Effective discipline is, and always will be, a necessity. But a routine school discipline infraction should land a student in a principal’s office – not in a police precinct.”
Funny, I never heard a peep from Holder when a white kid simply wore an NRA shirt to school and was arrested. I didn’t hear anything from his DOJ when a second grader was suspended for a pretending his finger was a gun or little boys were also suspended for pretending pencils were guns. There have been school disciplinary actions for a deaf boy using the sign of his name that looks like a “finger gun,” talking about guns and eating your Pop-Tart in the shape of a gun. But have we heard Holder on these issues? No, because again it doesn’t fit his brainwashing agenda against guns.
Lynch will be no different. She will push the same agenda, using the issue of “race” to cover for criminal activity. Citizens need to inundate their Senator’s email, fax and phone lines with demands that this woman not be appointed to the position of Attorney General.