No sooner had reports of the horrific attack on the office of the Paris satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo by Islamist commandos coalesced last week, than politicians and media talking heads began qualifying their accounts with liberal use of phraseology intended to obscure the fact that these mass murderers were Muslims. In some cases, these parties do not wish to be labeled “Islamophobic.” In other cases, they are deluding themselves in there being some operative distinction that exists between Islam and “radical Islam.”
Islam has a 1,400-year history of not playing well with others – of executing the same methodology in subjugating nations across the globe as they are currently executing in the West. I believe that there are many people of good conscience who deny the truth about Islam because if they acknowledged it, they would have to accept remedies to the threat that would be distasteful to them.
The truth? Considering the character of Islam at its core, all Muslims are part of this diabolical design of supplanting Western civilization with an Islamic one, indeed, whether they believe it or not. Few may become full-blown jihadis, but rest assured that most of them advocate what the full-blown jihadis are doing – and polling data of Muslims clearly reflects this.
History has proven unequivocally that anywhere you have emerging Muslim populations in non-Muslim nations, once they reach an elusive percentage point in terms of their population (some experts say between 3 to 5 percent), many will “become radicalized” and set the course for violent subjugation of the host culture.
So why would any non-Muslim nation of sound mind allow the importation of Muslims into their society?
The answer? They wouldn’t.
It is obvious that Europe is suffering for their folly of the last few decades in allowing Muslims to immigrate to their nations: “No-go” areas in France, pedophiliac sex-slave rings in Britain, a rape epidemic in Sweden and anti-Semitic demonstrations – all these are the byproducts of this Islamist ascendancy.
Here, it bears mentioning that the people engaging in the foregoing antisocial behavior are not “radical” jihadi commandos; they’re just Muslims, nonetheless wreaking havoc upon European society.
When addressing the Paris attack, in his trademark closeted Islamist fashion, President Obama refused to associate the gunmen with Islam in any way, avoiding use of the words “Islam,” “radical Islam,” “Muslim,” “jihad” or “Shariah.” This should be no surprise, however, coming from the man who catalyzed the Arab Spring, orchestrated the Muslim Brotherhood takeover of Egypt, set Libya ablaze and who funded, armed and trained the terror group ISIS.
Since the Charlie Hebdo attack, Obama, his operatives and certain foreign leaders have condemned terrorism, citing the need to bolster their defenses against institutionally violent factions. In a televised speech on Monday, French President Francois Hollande said that the Charlie Hebdo massacre suspects “have nothing do with the Muslim religion.”
Neither Obama nor Vice President Biden showed up at a massive Paris rally denouncing global terrorism, for which the White House drew hot criticism. To the consternation of many observers, Obama did send outgoing attorney general and resident racist Eric Holder to France, possibly to make sure French police were not engaging in ethnic profiling of criminals.
Like the irrefutable reality of Islam being the wellspring from which violent jihad and Islamist terror flows (a no-brainer to most of you), the Obama administration’s dismissive reaction to the Paris rally ought not be a surprise, because Obama and his posse find all of this jihadi mayhem positively delicious. Has no one considered the possibility that Obama wanted to send a message to the world that the Charlie Hebdo cartoonists got what they deserved?
According to WND columnist Pamela Geller,
The idea that America has better assimilated its Muslims than the U.K. and Europe is ridiculous on its face. The only difference between the U.S. and France, the U.K. and the rest of that doomed continent is that they began importing Muslims decades earlier than the U.S.
We are on the same path. The number of immigrants in the United States jumped 3 percent in three years – to a record 41.3 million in 2013 – and the nearly 300,000 who came from Muslim countries pose a major national security threat.
I have previously addressed in this space the fact that while it is being done rather quietly, Obama has been furiously importing Muslims into the U.S. – no doubt in order to reach that elusive percentage point of no return I mentioned earlier, whereupon ongoing Muslim-fomented civil unrest becomes inevitable.
The proof of Obama’s dedication to Islamist ascendency – some of which has been criminal in nature – is overwhelming, yet it is being widely denied and conveniently avoided, like the fundamental threat of Islam itself. The press ignores it, Congress is far too corrupt to address it, and in the meantime, we are treated to such classics as Senate Intelligence Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein stating that there are Islamist terror cells inside the United States, but there’s “no credible defined threat” to America.
As Sen. Ted Cruz stated earlier this week, “You cannot defeat radical Islamic terrorism if you’re unwilling to utter the words ‘radical Islamic terrorism.'”
I would add to that the necessity for Americans to acknowledge that a clear and present danger to this nation exists in the radical leftists, Islamists and sundry agenda-driven saboteurs who have insinuated themselves into places of power in America.