Out of the Mouth of Criminal Hillary Clinton: “Deep-Seated Cultural Codes, Religious Beliefs and Structural Biases Have to be Changed”

Written by:

Published on: April 24, 2015

Out of the mouths of criminals comes… well, comes criminal ideas. Just in case you haven’t heard, “deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs, and structural biases have to be changed” so women can access reproductive healthcare and safe childbirth. The criminal who said it is none other than Hillary Clinton.

Clinton, who is linked with her husband to numerous unexplained “suicides,” plane crash victims, and out and out murders, spoke to attendees at the sixth annual Women in the World summit. Here is some of what Clinton had to say.

“Far too many women are denied access to reproductive healthcare and safe childbirth and laws don’t count for much if they’re not enforced. Rights have to exist in practice – not just on paper.”

“Laws have to be backed up with resources and political will. And deep seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed. As I have said and as I believe, the advancement of the full participation of women and girls in every aspect of their societies is the great unfinished business of the 21st century and not just for women but for everyone – and not just in far away countries but right here in the United States.”

The phrase “denied access to reproductive health care and safe childbirth” refers back to abortion. Excuse me, but Planned Parenthood operates everywhere promoting the murder of babies in the womb. With Obamacare, every health care plan now has to cover abortion services and every US citizen is “mandated” or “ordered” to have an Obamacare compliant plan. So, how is it that women are denied being able to murder their own young? To some, it has never been so easy to condone and commit murder. In fact, because of Obamacare, many citizens are unwilling, indirect participants.

What is the most troubling is the comment “deep seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.” To what religious beliefs is she referring? What she terms “religious beliefs,” many of us term “God’s Law.” The Holy Bible as God’s Word conveys God’s laws for mankind; one of which is “Thou shalt not murder.” That’s not a belief. It is a commandment from God with no qualifiers. God’s law is sacred and is to be followed.

Is it the faith in God that must be changed? Or, are we to accept a secular humanist definition of the Bible in defiance of God’s law at the behest of a sect of society? The death cult of Islam has nothing to change as they believe anyone who doesn’t follow Islam is worthy of death, along with family members who “dishonor” them. So, obviously her comment is directed at Jews and Christians. No surprise to hear anti-Jewish and anti-Christian rhetoric from a criminal.

Someone please explain why it is acceptable to murder an innocent baby in the womb with impunity while murderers of all others are convicted, jailed and/or put to death for the wrongful taking of another life? Why are women allowed to kill their unborn child under “reproductive health care” with the baby being defined as a “fetus” while someone who murders a pregnant female is charged with two counts of murder – one for the baby and one for the mother? With this rationale, it sounds like “cultural codes” have already slipped way beyond what they should be.

Of course, murder, for both Bill and Hillary Clinton, is just another task in the day to day operation of the Clinton mega-corporation of political advancement. It’s no big deal. You just get rid of people (and babies) that have become a liability. Her actions, or rather inactions to increase security and complicity in a cover-up regarding Benghazi, speak volumes.

Being a “woman in the world,” my views certainly aren’t represented by this group of feminist hags. Feminists didn’t set out to achieve equality with men in the jobs market or in relation to pay scale. These “women” set out to basically “castrate” men and shame women who held traditional views. It worked. Women, who cared for the home and raised children, were seen as having no intellect, no depth, no soul and had to be saved/freed from their chains of bondage. Men, who supported the traditional roles of women, were seen as “oppressors” and had to be stopped at all costs.

What has that gotten society today? Women compete with men for jobs outside the home. The family unit has been compromised, almost destroyed, in favor of the feminist viewpoint of “you don’t need a man.” There are very few men left today who support traditional views of the roles of men and women. And, many men have ceased being men – those who stand upon principle, truth and faith, exhibit the role of “protector,” “supporter,” the head of the household, and who view women in a favorable light.

So, who again created the “war on women?” Certainly not those who hold traditional viewpoints and follow God’s laws.

There seems to have occurred too much that has changed in regard to abiding by God’s law. Where in God’s law does it say a woman “has the right” to murder her unborn child? Nowhere. And, rights come from God; so, the “right” of a woman to murder her unborn child was not given by God but by government. God commands “Thou shalt not murder.” The government contends, “Murder is against the law unless you are a woman and want to get rid of your unborn baby.” Any more change leads further down a dark road from which there is no escaping God’s judgment.

Once a Christian society and Judeo-Christian based government abandon the First Commandment of God – “I am the Lord thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage; Thou shalt have no other gods before me” (Exodus 20: 2-3) – the other nine fall by the wayside.

Don't forget to like SonsOfLibertyMedia.com on Facebook, Google+, & Twitter.
The opinions expressed in each article are the opinions of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect those of SonsOfLibertyMedia.com.
Check out Sons of Liberty Polls on LockerDome on LockerDome
Comment via Facebook
Comment via Disqus

Send this to friend