“All propaganda has to be popular and has to accommodate itself to the comprehension of the least intelligent of those whom it seeks to reach.”
Breitbart recently reported that former President Barack Obama took the title of “Most Admired Man” for the tenth consecutive year in a row, and former first lady and secretary of state Hillary Clinton is the “Most Admired Woman” for the 15th consecutive year in a row, according to a Gallup poll.
This is clearly nothing short of propaganda.
Trending: How Could Stanley Ann Dunham Have Delivered Barack Hussein Obama In August Of 1961 in Hawaii, When Official University Of Washington Records Show Her 2,680 Miles Away In Seattle Attending Classes That Same Month?
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
Propaganda, in this case, is an attempt to cause the readers to believe that they have the support of the masses, which they do not.
Remember their tactics America:
“Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” – Saul Alinsky, “Rules for Radicals: A Practical Primer for Realistic Radicals,” p. 126
The truth of the matter is that the headline should have stated, Barack Hussein Obama (Soetoro Sobarkah), the “Most Despised Man” in America, and Hillary Clinton, the “Most Despised Woman” in America.
First of all, there is Barack Hussein Obama, the person with 47 different Social Security numbers. This is the person who has his Harvard Law School, Columbia College, and Occidental college records sealed. He is the person who has his Illinois State Senator records sealed, Illinois State Bar records sealed, his Client List sealed, Punahou School and financial records sealed, Noeiani Elementary records sealed, name change records sealed, marriage license between father and mother sealed, records of Obama’s mother’s repatriation as US citizen on return from Indonesia sealed, his adoption records, baptism records all sealed.
And he is the most admired man in America, according to this report? No one knows who he is except for what they have seen him do and it is not admirable in any sense of the word. Just think Americans, he campaigned on transparency (2 Corinthian 11:14-15).
CNN’s president resigned last year due to the low viewership it received. Maybe this will shed some light as to why he resigned: Amber Lyon, former news anchor for CNN, said she was ordered to report fake stories, delete unfriendly stories adverse to the Obama administration and construct stories in specific manners while working for the left-wing network. Lyon said CNN is paid by U.S. and foreign governments for reporting on some events and not reporting on others. She also stated that the Obama administration pays for CNN content.
The New York Times actually blurted out the truth in their confusion (to their credit, I might add) that all information coming out of the Obama administration is first vetted.
Or what about MSNBC? I’m sorry I even have to bring them into the equation, but their slogan during the election campaign happened to be “Lean Forward,” which is directly derived from the communist playbook. MSNBC parades people like radical lesbian Rachel Maddow, the shameful uncivil rights want-to-be leader Al Sharpton and Chris “It’s a terrible place to be when your brains are in someone else’s head” Matthews.
Nothing could be further from the truth!
Don’t you remember that in the 2010 elections, 63 Democratic representatives were unseated?
Do you remember that Barack Hussein Obama had to move the 2012 Democratic Convention from a 74,000-seat arena to a 20,000-seat arena, and he still couldn’t fill the seats by giving away free tickets?
Do you remember when it was reported in Milwaukee that people filled up an 18,000-seat arena to see Barack Hussein Obama, when in fact there were only 5,000 seats available?
Do you remember that 70 percent of Obama’s Twitter followers were found to be fake accounts, created out of thin air?
Do you remember when Stevie Wonder couldn’t get 200 people to show up for a fundraiser for Barack Hussein Obama?
Did you forget that during the re-election inauguration there weren’t even enough people in Washington, D.C. to fill up the hotel rooms?
And of course, you surely haven’t forgotten the massive voter fraud that took place in the United States in the last election.
Communist dictator Josef Stalin said, “Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything.”
Who supported Barrack Hussein Obama then? Well, the homosexuals do for one, who make up less than 1.7 percent of the population – the very ones who are being used as a political battering ram only to make way for Shariah law (They just haven’t realized that yet).
Planned Parenthood supports him, only to be used as a political battering ram to eradicate human life under the guise of “choice” (Which in truth is population control).
In effect, Obama’s support only comes from those who are at war with our Constitutional Republic and those who are at war with God who gave us our rights to establish our Constitutional Republic (Exodus 18:21).
Without the United States, countries like Cuba, Venezuela, China, Russia, the Muslim Brotherhood, etc. have expressed their support for Obama as well.
Furthermore, why are the illegals so important to Obama if he has all that support?
No wonder this administration sees fit to “Lean Forward” to open the floodgates to illegal immigration. So, does this administration have the support you might think they have?
The Gallup poll, which has been conducted every year since 1946, asked respondents to name their top two picks for most admired man and woman.
Pope Francis, who even though he is becoming more despised by the Catholic Church on a daily basis, mysteriously followed with three percent of the vote, and Rev. Billy Graham came in fourth with two percent of the vote.
Adding insult to injury, the poll also mentioned other political, business, and religious leaders, including “Songbird” Senator John McCain (R-AZ), Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, the Dalai Lama, and Tesla CEO Elon Musk.
For the woman, it again was reported that Hillary Clinton topped the list for “Most Admired Woman” — a title she has held onto for the past 15 years.
However, Gallup notes that she may not hold onto this title in future years because her polling numbers were at their lowest in 15 years and are unlikely to improve as her political career is “likely over.”
Where did all of that support come from to support those polls America?
I’ll tell you, out from the offices of the propagandists.
What has been reported concerning this poll and what the facts truly are, are in stark contrast to what we found.
When going to Facebook alone, what pops up are pages such as “Hillary Clinton Sucks,” “Hillary Clinton is WRONG for America,” and several titled “HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRISON.”
Even more telling was that when Clinton was in her position as Secretary of State, the Associated Press reported that the State Department was buying Facebook “likes.”
In 2013, the State Department, which has more than 400,000 likes and was recently most popular in Cairo, said it would stop buying Facebook fans after its inspector general criticized the agency for spending $630,000 to boost the numbers. In one case, its fan tally rose from about 10,000 to more than 2.5 million.
But that isn’t all. When Hillary opened up her campaign in Iowa, there were actually more reporters who attended than voters.
Clinton’s Iowa campaign kickoff event roused a whopping 22 people! National Journal reports:
Gone are the soaring speeches and the big rally crowds, swapped out for roundtable discussions and meet-and-greets with local activists.
But the dozens of reporters both in the room and chasing after her van outside were a reminder of just how difficult it will be for one of the most recognizable public figures in the world to hold events that truly feel intimate.
On Tuesday, for example, Clinton was seated at a table with just seven other people for the discussion, with an audience of another 15. But those Iowans were far outnumbered by the dozens of reporters who were bunched together behind a thin yellow rope at the back of the room.
Indeed, despite some limits on the number of press credentials handed out by Clinton’s Iowa team—each outlet had one person in the room, and national television and photography was pooled—it still was a big group. Bigger yet was the press crowd outside, where reporters who weren’t admitted to the event chased Clinton’s van when it first pulled up here, contributing to the feeling of a media circus surrounding the former Secretary of State’s Iowa launch.
Clinton joked about the horde of reporters as the event opened, telling the seven-roundtable participants: “Well, thank you for having me here—and a few of my friends.”
That is not all friends. According to her Twitter account, as of April 14, 2015, Clinton had 3,351,547 Twitter followers.
However, as the Daily Mail reports:
According to two popular online measuring tools, no more than 44 percent of her Twitter fan base consists of real people who are active in using the social media platform. And at least 15 percent – more than 544,000 – are completely fake.
Brazenly and shamelessly it was reported that former first lady Michelle Obama took the runner-up slot, with seven percent of the vote, while Oprah Winfrey took third place with four percent. Gallup surveyed 1,049 adults from December 4–11 with a four percent margin of error.
It absolutely amazes me that the American people continually fall into the talking points of the media that they decry as nothing short of what it is that they are, “Propagandists” (Jeremiah 5:21).
Become an insider!
Sign up to get breaking alerts from Sons of Liberty Media.