Computer science and engineering professor J. Alex Halderman was able to hack a Dominion voting tabulator in a federal court in Atlanta, Georgia in front of US District Judge Amy Totenberg, and he only used a pen to change vote totals. And the Mockingbird Media and lying, corrupt politicians tell us there is no election fraud taking place!
BREAKING: In a Federal Court in Atlanta, Georgia, computer science and engineering professor J. Alex Halderman was able to hack a Dominion voting tabulator in front of U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg using only a pen to change the vote totals.
— Leading Report (@LeadingReport) January 21, 2024
Propaganda outlet CNN reported:
The report’s findings focus on weaknesses in software for certain Dominion Voting machines. Those weaknesses were previously verified by federal cybersecurity officials, who urged election officials across the country to update their systems.
A lawyer for Georgia’s top election official, Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, recently told a federal court that officials would forgo installing Dominion’s security patches until after the 2024 presidential election.
Of course, they will continue to tell you these can’t be hacked and that elections are safe and fair. Nothing could be further from the truth!
The Washington Post adds:
The report — by University of Michigan professor J. Alex Halderman and Auburn University assistant professor Drew Springall, who helped him — outlined several cybersecurity flaws, the most critical of which they say could be exploited by malicious hackers to change votes and alter election outcomes. Importantly, Halderman said there’s no evidence that the vulnerabilities have actually been used by malicious hackers to change votes or steal an election.
All of this comes as no surprise as we have seen the largest voting machine vendor in the US admit that its systems had remote-access software, Mockingbird Media has reported on the ease of voter fraud using these machines, and there has been testimony over a decade old in court to the fact that these machines can be manipulated and no one would be able to identify the manipulation.
Clinton Eugene “Clint” Curtis is an American attorney, computer programmer and ex-employee of NASA and ExxonMobil, told the world in open testimony that voting machines are not only hackable to determine an election, but that he designed the program to do it in 2000.
Curtis’ testimony came in 2006 before the US House Judiciary Members in Ohio. In 100, Curtis was hired by Tom Feeney to build software that would rig an election using electronic voter machines. According to Curtis, he could rig the machines in such a way to determine a 51/49 split in favor of the person that was wanted to win.
Take a look.
Additionally, here’s a few more reports about these machines.
How to hack into a U.S voting machine in 2 minutes
Electronic Voting Machines “Malfunctioning” – When Will People Wake Up?
Central Christian voting machines in Mesa, Arizona are also broken
