Tucker Carlson Endorses Noahide Laws: Tells Ari Shaffir He’s Been Reading The Talmud, ‘It’s Very Interesting’ (Video)

First, let me preface this by saying that I think Tucker Carlson presents well, but I am always reserved with him due to his CIA-tied history, which I suspect is still in place and he has been moved out of FOX to start his own venture to continue to keep the masses in the system rather than rebel against it.  Yet, in a recent interview, which not only does he appear to endorse the Noahide laws that we have been warning about for years, but says he has been reading the Talmud, and finds that “it’s very interesting.”

Keep in mind that Ari Shaffir, the man he is interviewing, is presenting another way of salvation other than that of King Jesus who claimed He is “the Way, the Truth and the Life” and that “no man comes to the Father but by me [Him]” (John 14:6).

Take a look.  You can also watch the entire interview here.

Keep in mind that the Talmud’s writings were largely what Jesus opposed in Matthew 5-7 when He addressed them by saying, “You’ve heard it said, but I say unto you…”  He condemned the Pharisees for their understanding of God and His moral law in Matthew 23.

Yet, you can read the Talmud and also the opinions of the Rabbis here, along with other “Jewish” writings and you’ll discover some incredibly perverted teachings.

For instance, let me just give you three examples that flow in a row.

מֵתִיב רַב אוֹשַׁעְיָא: גָּדוֹל שֶׁבָּא עַל הַקְּטַנָּה, וְקָטָן הַבָּא עַל הַגְּדוֹלָה, וּמוּכַּת עֵץ — כְּתוּבָּתָן מָאתַיִם, דִּבְרֵי רַבִּי מֵאִיר. וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים: מוּכַּת עֵץ כְּתוּבָּתָהּ מָנֶה.

Rav Oshaya raised an objection to the opinion of Rav from the mishna: With regard to an adult man who engaged in intercourse with a minor girl less than three years old, or a minor boy less than nine years old who engaged in intercourse with an adult woman, or a woman who had her hymen ruptured by wood or any other foreign object, the marriage contract for each of these women is two hundred dinars. This is the statement of Rabbi Meir. And the Rabbis say: The marriage contract of a woman whose hymen was ruptured by wood is one hundred dinars. Contrary to Rav’s opinion, the Rabbis distinguish between the halakha in the case of the intercourse of a minor boy and the halakha in the case of a woman whose hymen was ruptured by wood.

אָמַר רָבָא, הָכִי קָאָמַר: גָּדוֹל הַבָּא עַל הַקְּטַנָּה — וְלֹא כְּלוּם, דְּפָחוֹת מִכָּאן כְּנוֹתֵן אֶצְבַּע בָּעַיִן דָּמֵי. וְקָטָן הַבָּא עַל הַגְּדוֹלָה — עֲשָׂאָהּ מוּכַּת עֵץ. וּמוּכַּת עֵץ גּוּפָא פְּלוּגְתָּא דְּרַבִּי מֵאִיר וְרַבָּנַן.

Rava said that this is what the mishna is saying: An adult man who engaged in intercourse with a minor girl less than three years old has done nothing, as intercourse with a girl less than three years old is tantamount to poking a finger into the eye. In the case of an eye, after a tear falls from it another tear forms to replace it. Similarly, the ruptured hymen of the girl younger than three is restored. And a young boy who engaged in intercourse with an adult woman renders her as one whose hymen was ruptured by wood. And with regard to the case of a woman whose hymen was ruptured by wood itself, there is a dispute between Rabbi Meir and the Rabbis. Rabbi Meir maintains that her marriage contract is two hundred dinars, and the Rabbis maintain that it is one hundred dinars.

אָמַר רָמֵי בַּר חָמָא: מַחֲלוֹקֶת כְּשֶׁהִכִּיר בָּהּ, דְּרַבִּי מֵאִיר מְדַמֵּי לַהּ לְבוֹגֶרֶת. וְרַבָּנַן מְדַמּוּ לַהּ לִבְעוּלָה, אֲבָל לֹא הִכִּיר בָּהּ — דִּבְרֵי הַכֹּל וְלֹא כְּלוּם.

Rami bar Ḥama said: This dispute is specifically in a case where the husband was aware that her hymen was ruptured by wood, as in that case Rabbi Meir likens her to a grown woman, whose hymen does not completely obstruct the orifice as a result of the maturation process. Nevertheless, her marriage contract is that of a virgin, two hundred dinars. And the Rabbis liken her to a non-virgin who engaged in intercourse in the past. Her marriage contract is one hundred dinars. However, if he was not aware that her hymen was ruptured by wood and was under the impression that she was a full-fledged virgin, everyone agrees that she receives no marriage contract at all when he becomes aware of her condition, as the marriage was a mistaken transaction.

See?  This is exactly why these people were rebuked by Christ and condemned.  Yet, it is people who subscribe to these teachings who are committing genocide in Gaza, seeking to influence US elections and politicians and who many professed Christians endorse, support and listen to as though they serve the same God.

They don’t and we need to realize this and heed the warnings of the apostle John in his three epistles in which he warns his readers to beware of antichrists, those who deny that Jesus, who is God (John1:1), came in the flesh.

No doubt, many ignorant people will follow right along with this believing that God has a way of salvation for those who call themselves Jews and are not (Revelation 2:9, 3:9) and for “Gentiles”.  This puts them under the anathema of Scripture (Galatians 1:8; 1 Corinthians 16:22).

Friends, there is only ONE WAY of salvation and that is in the person and work of the Lord Jesus Christ, both in his active obedience to the Father in His earthly ministry as Messiah and his passive obedience to the Father in his death upon the cross for sinners.