Look where we are. As a woman, I am outraged and sickened by these arbitrators, judge-jury-executioners of cultural mores and cultural orthodoxies like the NY Times, who still hold enormous sway in the information battle-space.
We are supposed to accept that men are better at being women than women and that we are the exceptions as if womanhood is all artifice and cosmetics. Feminists stand with this the most misogynist, anti-women movement in history.
The New York Times faced a wave of backlash for a story that referred to biological females as “non-transgender women.” The story in question, titled “How a Women’s College Volleyball Team Became the Center of the Transgender Athlete Debate,” explored the explosion of protests and forfeitures surrounding San Jose State University and the school’s star player — a trans-identifying male…But after being referred to as “cis” women, “birthing persons,” and “menstruators,” it was the NYT’s phrasing that got the attention of their critics (Daily Wire).
WomenAreReal: Hey NYTimes: Don’t call us ‘non-transgender women.’ Just stop it. Stop all the offensive terms for us. Birthing parent. Uterus haver. Menstruator. Vaginal presenting (from the Olympus spa hearing). We are WOMEN (X)!
Charlie Kirk: The New York Times is so committed to the trans insanity that they’ve now resorted to describing good, old-fashioned women as “non-transgender women.” Good thing we’re the media now (X).
Article posted with permission from Pamela Geller
