The recent Center for Disease Control (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) had Church of Vaccine members’ heads exploding after the committee voted to remove the recommendation for the birth dose of Hepatitis B (Hep B) vaccine and shift the first dose to two-month-old babies. Mind you, this vaccine lacked a placebo-controlled group in the clinical trial and used only 147 children ages 0 – 10, then followed these children for only 5 days after each dose. Based on this information, the Hep B vaccine was approved by the Food and Drug Administration. In 1991, a New York Times article highlighted the goal was not to prevent maternal transmission, but prevent adult cases. However, adults weren’t taking the Hep B shots. So, the solution, not based on any type of science, was “give it to every baby born”.
The Hep B shot was added to the childhood schedule for babies without any safety testing and no safety testing was done regarding the administration of multiple vaccines at any stage of a child’s life. No pharma company, “doctor”, or any government agency, constitutional or otherwise, knew what the outcome would be when administering 3 to 7 shots to an infant or baby. No safety testing was done on vaccine components (adjuvants) either, individually or in combination. No one knew what would happen or what risks were involved. That is, until now.
Children’s Health Defense scientists, Brian Hooker, PhD and Karl Jablonowski, PhD, conducted an analysis of data obtained from the Louisiana Department of Health. Their findings were significant and appeared on Preprint.org.
Abstract
The Louisiana Department of Health provided a dataset of 1,775 children who died before their 3rd birthday, between 2013 and 2024, and were matched to an immunization record. This study analyzes the children vaccinated in their 2nd month of life (60-90 days old) and the outcome of dying in the 3rd month of life (90-120 days old). Children vaccinated in their 2nd month of life were between 29%-74% (depending on vaccine) more likely to die in their 3rd month, between 28%-74% if black, and between 52%-98% if female. Compared collectively, children who received all 6 recommended 2-month vaccines were 68% (68% for blacks and 112% for females) more likely to die in their 3rd month. Not only are these mortality rates elevated, but the causes of death present differently based on vaccination. CDC recommendation-compliant female children were more likely to die of non-leading causes of death, and, in this analysis, included 3 infectious disease [sic] and 4 nervous system-related mortalities in the vaccinated and zero, in either, for the unvaccinated.
According to Children’s Health Defense, “Overall, children who received all six vaccines recommended for 2-month-olds were 68% more likely to die in their third month of life, the data showed”.
“This very important paper represents one of the first studies on the cumulative effect of vaccines given at 2 months of age following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) recommended schedule,” Hooker told The Defender.
He added:
“The highest infant mortality rates were seen when children received all six of the recommended vaccines in one visit. In addition to elevated mortality, the vaccination schedule also increased the likelihood that children were more likely to die of non-leading causes of death.
“This type of study is needed to guide the efforts of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and especially the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) as they revisit the recommended schedule.”
The CDC recommended childhood immunization schedule indicates 7 vaccines are given to infants at 2 months of age. Notice the most recent update is August 7, 2025, as of this writing, meaning the Hep B birth dose remains on the schedule. Screenshots are provided as proof since it could change at any time. The recommended immunizations to be given to infants aged 2 months are respiratory syncytial virus (RSV); Hepatitis B (Hep B); rotavirus (immunization Paul Offit helped develop); diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (DTaP); Haemophilus Influenza B (HiB); pneumococcal vaccine (PCV15, PCV20); and inactivated poliovirus (IPV). Research each of these vaccines for yourself at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) website. If your time is short, the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) attorney Aaron Siri has summarized research findings in an easy to read chart.
According to Hooker and Jablonowski, “It is the largest single-day antigenic assault a person is ever likely to encounter in their lifetimes, and may be accompanied with 1.225 mg [milligrams] of aluminum adjuvant … even though the … maximum per-dose limit allowable by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is 0.85mg.”
The infant mortality rate in the U.S. is about 1 in 200. However, “in what amounts to one of the greatest health hazards in the entire country, and a national injustice,” according to the authors, the mortality rate for infants born to Black mothers is approximately 1 in 100 — almost double the national rate.
This finding amounts to a bombshell that will no doubt be discredited by the Church of Vaccine and the Operation Mockingbird propaganda lamestream enemedia. Can we really be sure of the official narrative that “vaccines are safe and effective”?
However, some doctors and scientists, including some who spoke at recent ACIP meetings, are beginning to acknowledge that these claims are based on limited evidence, that many vaccines were recommended without sufficient safety data and that the expansion of the childhood schedule coincided with a rise in chronic illness among U.S. children.
The authors said their study — although limited to a few thousand children — is, to date, one of the largest studies of its kind.
“By epidemiological standards, it is a really small dataset, yet it is among the largest and most detailed of its kind,” Jablonowski told The Defender. “By contrast, when Vanderbilt University and the CDC published ‘Risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome after Immunization with the Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine,’ they analyzed only a couple hundred infant deaths”.
He added:
“I didn’t have expectations on what we would find, because there is no comparator. A study this large, with this level of detail, focused on the second month of life, to my knowledge has never been done before.
“If vaccine safety were as heavily researched as vaccine proponents would like us to believe, this would have been a well-trodden exercise and we would have found nothing, not even the whisper of a disturbing trend. But there is nothing subtle about the measured safety signals. The records of children who are no longer with us demonstrate the hazard of the 2-month recommended vaccines.”
Despite some doctors and scientists beginning to acknowledge the mantra of “safe and effective” was based on limited evidence, inadequate safety data, and the rise of chronic illness in children coinciding with the expansion of the childhood immunization schedule, not one doctor or scientist has recommended pausing or suspending immunizations for children until studies can be conducted like the one done by Hooker and Jablonowski.
Jablonowski described the study as “deeply troubling”. He admitted that “one study does not make consensus”. However, he indicated the study needs to be replicated many times over – every state, region, and/or nation through independent analysts.
Jablonowski and Hooker said that only broader access to comparable datasets — and independent replication — can determine whether the patterns observed in Louisiana reflect a localized anomaly or a more general phenomenon.
“To validate, generalize, and explore that harm further requires corroboration with additional sources of evidence. Every state, province, and country where an immunization registry may be matched with a death registry may provide that evidence,” they wrote.
You can read the entire paper for yourself as well as the source article.
One finding that was very interesting was the patterns of causes of death that emerged.
The authors also analyzed reported causes of death, comparing distributions of those causes among vaccinated and unvaccinated female infants who died in their third month of life.
They found that vaccinated females were more likely to die from causes outside the leading categories of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), accidental suffocation and ill-defined causes.
Specifically, the analysis identified several deaths attributed to infectious diseases and nervous system conditions among vaccinated female infants, compared with none in the unvaccinated group during the same period.
This was significant, they wrote, because if vaccinations played no role in mortality, the distribution of causes of death would be expected to remain consistent between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. [Emphasis mine]
If you want to know what ingredients are in vaccines approved for use in the US by the FDA, you can access it through Johns Hopkins Institute for Vaccine Safety and the FDA website. To further guide you on vaccine excipients (ingredients), screenshots are provided for aborted fetal tissue in vaccines and where those tissues originated. Previously, in the CDC Pink Book, a chart was contained that listed the vaccine and its excipients. Evidently, this two-page chart has now been removed in favor of the list at the Institute for Vaccine Safety. This just makes it harder for those who do not have time to research to find all ingredients. However, the package inserts for each vaccine contained at the FDA website is required to list ingredients. You can verify if all ingredients are listed on the institute’s website.
It would also be beneficial for readers to read the comments below the Children’s Health Defense source article.
On a personal note – Despite the exhaustive research conducted into these vaccine products, the only time information is provided is here at Sons of Liberty Media. In trying to convey information on these products to friends, family, and parents, in order to provide informed consent, which is not being given at doctors’ visits, one would think I had ten heads, based on the looks given. Those buying into the Church of Vaccines always counter with “that’s not true” or “I don’t believe that” without ever verifying the information for themselves, which is readily available to anyone with internet access and a website address. Therefore, I have limited providing information to friends, family and parents through direct contact to those who ask. The sad part in all of this is these individuals know the time and effort spent researching topics and information for Sons of Liberty Media. I even had a church minister accuse me of lying when asking to present information to parents at the church with the physical documents in my hand.
Whatever anyone decides to do with the information is their choice. The only objective I have in providing this information is making sure readers and anyone who asks is informed – good, bad, or indifferent.
With all this study by Hooker and Jablonowski has discovered warrants further studies to be conducted to truly determine and understand the crisis faced regarding injury and death surrounding vaccine products. It’s not going to be done unless the people demand it. Without these studies, we are “jabbing” in the dark.
