Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie is facing an onslaught of Epstein-class Zionist opposition from Zionist billionaires and President Donald Trump. Yet, he remains as he has always been, constitutional. His opponent is pushing for a draft as the Zionists leaked false accusations about him being sexually active with members of Congress and even exploiting a relationship he had with a woman after his wife’s death. Now, that woman sets the record straight.
Andrew Muller reports at The Liberty Sentinel:
Seven days before Congressman Thomas Massie (R-KY) faces the largest election battle of his career against President Donald Trump-endorsed challenger Ed Gallrein, bombshell allegations from Massie’s ex-girlfriend, Cynthia West, have taken the nation by storm.
The charge: Massie emotionally abused West for refusing to partake in behavior she viewed as repugnant and uncomfortable.
A firestorm of accusations and misinformation has spread across social media, with multiple voices calling Massie a “predator” and a “hypocrite.”
Critics say Massie retaliated against West by having her fired from her job as a director of scheduling operations for Representative Victoria Spartz (R-IN), a gig Massie orchestrated for her.
Even former FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino reposted an image of West accompanied by a caption calling Massie a “pervert.”
In an exclusive interview with The Liberty Sentinel, West clarified the details, offered crucial context, and provided a never-before-seen photograph of her and Massie on a trip to South Africa.
Mental Abuse, Not Sexual or Physical
At the heart of West’s story is the claim that Massie allegedly pressured her to engage in behavior that made her uncomfortable and that she viewed as morally reprehensible.
When asked by The Liberty Sentinel about the extent of the alleged abuse, West revealed Massie did not physically abuse or sexually assault her, as many pundits are claiming.
Rather, West revealed it was “the anger and the vitriol towards me for not engaging in things that I was not comfortable with.”
West said the extent of abuse was “pressure and manipulation, essentially.”
“I already went past my comfort zone with him,” West told The Liberty Sentinel. “And it got to a point where I knew it was not going to let up, and I was not going to compromise what I already told him I was uncomfortable doing, and he wouldn’t let it go. So that was the end of the relationship.”
Massie simply was not respectful, West revealed. But he did not assault her sexually or physically. Period.
To make matters crystal clear, when pressed again by The Liberty Sentinel on whether Massie sexually or physically abused her, West stated bluntly, “No.”
Still, the powerful forces arrayed against Massie seized on the news to paint the longtime Kentucky lawmaker as a sexual deviant.
Massie Responds: It’s “False”
In a statement posted on X, the Kentucky Republican denied all allegations of wrongdoing and said he was considering legal action.
“It’s sad that a week before this election people are making false and unsubstantiated allegations about me in an obvious attempt to influence the outcome of this election,” Massie said. “All of the claims of inappropriate conduct are false.”
He concluded: “There are no ethics claims filed against me, nor have there ever been any claims filed against me in my 14 years in office. I have consulted legal counsel and we are considering all options.”
Context and Timeline
In the viral allegation video, West, under oath, shared her story with lawyer Marcus Carey in an exposé that she traveled from Florida to Kentucky to film.
The Liberty Sentinel reached out to Carey for comment, but did not receive a response by press time.
According to West’s account, her connection with Massie began in the middle of August 2024, nearly two months after the death of the congressman’s wife of 31 years, Rhonda Massie.
He contacted West via private message on X (formerly Twitter), responding privately to a public comment West made regarding U.S. withdrawal from the United Nations and NATO. Massie began liking her posts while calling and texting her, she said.
At the time of contact, West was legally separated from her husband, who shared fifty-fifty custody of their children.
West said it was clear Massie was pursuing a relationship after the death of his high school sweetheart, and she viewed the connection as an incredible rebound.
Being with Massie was a “fairytale,” she shared. “Or at least so I thought.”
West says Massie wanted to escalate the relationship and move swiftly, even giving her a promise ring and meeting repeatedly in person.
In addition to Massie visiting West in Florida and her visiting him at his farm in Kentucky, the pair went on trips to Savannah, Georgia, and South Africa to meet with economists. Massie footed the bill, she said.
But, according to West, the speed at which the relationship progressed was important to him. His position was that “we either ratchet up or ratchet off,” she stated.
Due to conflicting schedules, Massie encouraged West to move to D.C. so they could be closer.
To make it work, Massie helped get West a job with Rep. Spartz, an arrangement West claims the Ethics Committee knew about.
West only worked for Spartz for six weeks on a probationary basis before being let go. Spartz’s office said the decision was due to performance, not any interference from Massie.
Working for Spartz: Hiring Non-Citizens in Congress
During the short-lived gig, West claimed Spartz was employing non-citizens on a temporary 90-day basis. The congresswoman’s office even hired a foreign national as her district director who was waiting to obtain a green card before being able to receive compensation, West said.
Troubled by what she viewed as a potential national security risk and unethical practice, West began gathering data in a folder to later give to the Ethics Committee.
Spartz, whom West said has a track record of mistreating employees, also supposedly yelled at her for wanting to attend church.
West decided she wanted to present Spartz’s misconduct to the Committee, a notion Massie allegedly advised against. But West pressed on with her research, ultimately costing her the job, she said.
It was West’s efforts to push for transparency regarding Spartz’s unethical hiring practices and chastising her for attending church that led to the firing — not because Massie arranged for her removal in a retaliation scheme. That comes from West herself.
In her recent interview in Kentucky that sparked the scandal, West revealed: “She [Spartz] was engaging in behavior that I was concerned about, and so I believe that is why I was fired.”
Despite this revelation, pundits are laying the blame for West’s firing on Massie as a revenge stunt.
In fact, an account on X that received millions of views clipping the interview claims that “Thomas Massie had her fired.”
West said she believes she was in fact let go for raising her concerns about Spartz.
According to a proposed agreement obtained by Axios, West was offered a $60,000 settlement for wrongful termination.
But the deal came with a nondisclosure agreement (NDA) that West refused to sign. The settlement and the NDA came from Spartz, not Massie. Ultimately, she refused it.
“I have an offer at the House for approval,” West said regarding the settlement offer for alleged violations of the Congressional Accountability Act.
West’s public statements have likely compromised any chance at settlement, analysts said.
“Rep. Spartz would be happy to publicly disclose all aspects of these allegations, the circumstances surrounding Ms. West’s employment, and how this process is structured in Congress, if permitted to do so,” Spartz’s office said in a statement.
The extent of the scandal, West told this writer, “is not just this jilted lover thing. This is right and wrong.”
To West, the exposé is not only about the alleged emotional abuse from Massie; it is also about corruption in Washington, D.C.
Massie’s Alleged Hush Money
After West revealed to Massie the alleged corruption in Spartz’s office, West said he offered her $5,000 of what she calls “cow money”— supposedly untraceable cash Massie earned from his livestock — to quietly leave the job and pack up her bags.
According to West, Massie wanted to protect Spartz, and the cash would perhaps float West for a while as the dust settled.
In her viral exposé, West said without hesitation, “But I didn’t take it though.”
Yet in her statements to The Liberty Sentinel, West clarified that in December of 2024, Massie gave her the cash, which she had until January of 2025, shortly after they broke up. Ultimately, she gave it back.
“He gave me the money in December of 2024. I gave it back to him in mid-January of 2025. We broke up, and I gave him his money,” she told this writer, adding that she refused to be seen as a “transaction.”
Analysts have commented that according to LegiStorm, West began working for Spartz in December of 2024, leaving the post in March of 2025. According to West, she received the cash from Massie in December of 2024, which would be right before or immediately after she began the job.
Privately giving money to an individual for silence is not illegal but raises ethical concerns if proven to be true, legal analysts said.
West has yet to release any screenshots or receipts, despite claiming to have them.
West also says she went to the Ethics Committee after receiving the $5,000, a move she warned Massie about.
The two have not spoken since the debacle, and the case remains unresolved at the House.
“I’ve never offered anyone money in exchange for their silence,” Massie claims in his official response posted to social media. “I report all of my farm income, including cash, to the IRS.”
Why Now?
The question on the minds of Massie supporters is, why release accusations now?
Massie, who was once endorsed by Trump, has been blasted by the president as a “moron” and “3rd rate grandstander.”
The reason: voting against certain key legislation such as the “Big, Beautiful Bill” backed by Trump.
The congressman, who has almost a perfect score on The New American magazine’s Freedom Index ranking lawmakers based on fidelity to the U.S. Constitution, argued that the BBB contained unconstitutional poison pills in addition to the good policies.
According to the congressman, the “Israeli lobby” — AIPAC in conjunction with megadonors Miriam Adelson, Paul Singer, and John Paulson — has spent $10 million to unseat him.
While Massie is often portrayed as being anti-Israel for refusing to support aid, he rejects that assertion, pointing to the Constitution as his rationale.
Indeed, Massie has also loudly rejected giving aid to the hostile Islamic regimes surrounding Israel — powers that collectively receive far more U.S. taxpayer aid than the Israeli government.
Massie supporters nationwide have asked why West would release this bombshell at the 11th hour in a race that has been dubbed the most significant primary in Kentucky history and, perhaps, in American history.
West told The Liberty Sentinel that after she disclosed the situation to the House Ethics Committee and House staff advocacy, no one cared. She reached the conclusion that no one would listen.
“I’ve reached out to several different people before this,” she said. “People who now all of a sudden care.”
“People don’t care until it’s expedient for them to care,” she added.
What triggered West to come out was, in part, she said, Massie’s efforts to bring justice, accountability, and transparency to what he calls “the Epstein class.”
“I saw the Epstein stuff getting released, and that really made me feel upset because, you know, if transparency and justice matter for the victims, and me hearing that from Thomas, that did not match up with my experience,” West revealed.
Massie was the key Republican co-sponsor of the Epstein Files Transparency Act and has been among the most vocal lawmakers on the issue. He believes that is one of the reasons he is being targeted.
In a recent interview about the Epstein files with Liberty Sentinel CEO Alex Newman for The New American podcast and radio show Behind The Deep State, Rep. Massie said he would do it all again.
“Until we get justice for the victims, I will not go away, and this issue will not go away,” he explained. “If I lose my reelection over this, it was worth it.”
Massie’s support for Rep. Nancy Mace’s (R-SC) motion to release sexual misconduct and harassment reports involving members of Congress was also an eye-opening event for West.
She added in her exposé that she waited “too long” to speak out.
Commentary and Backlash
Thousands of pundits have commented on West’s claims already. The forces gunning for Massie hope it will sink his re-election bid.
A Massie-aligned state representative from Kentucky, Steven Doan (R-KY District 69), said he believes the accusations to be false.
“There is no ethics complaint,” he posted on X, “never was one.”
He continued, “West alleges a complaint to the Office of Congressional Workplace Rights, Massie is merely named as [a] witness. Anyone saying otherwise has not examined the evidence and is confusing the offices.”
In a separate post, Doan stated: “Out of professional duty, I examined the available record. Ms. West has a documented history of making false abuse allegations. Notably, during the very period she claims to have been involved with Congressman Massie, she filed sworn accusations of emotional and physical abuse against the father of her children. On October 1, 2024, she swore under oath in an affidavit to these claims. However, after the court reviewed all the evidence, the allegations were dismissed in full.”
On the other hand, Will Chamberlain, senior counsel at The Article III Project, posted, “It’s a more precise and robust piece of evidence than anything Thomas Massie relied on to slander the Trump Administration as the ‘Epstein Administration.’”
West is currently running for school board in Florida’s 5th District and has raised an $82,560 campaign war chest. $65,000 was her own money.
Massie’s primary election is on May 19. Polls, which even recently have shown Massie with a commanding lead, now suggest the race could go either way.
