Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

A Narrow Conservative Court Won’t Protect the Constitution

Written by:

Published on: June 16, 2020

The Supreme Court, post-Scalia, has two solid conservative justices, Thomas and Alito. Gorsuch has proven himself to be another Roberts. That shouldn’t be surprising. Kavanaugh, despite how much conservatives bled for him, is, even less surprisingly, a disappointment.

Justices Neil Gorsuch and Chief Justice John Roberts joined the liberal wing of the court to affirm that the law does cover discrimination by sexual orientation. Gorsuch, in fact, wrote the majority opinion. Justices Sam Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented. Finally, Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a separate dissent stating that he agreed with Alito and Thomas on the merits but sympathized with the majority’s conclusion. All five claimed their opinions adhered to a textualist reading of the law.

Textualist is better than simply inserting words into the Constitution. But it revises the meaning of the words that are already in there to mean things that they never represented. Or, in this case, the Civil Rights Act. It’s legislating from the bench in a slightly more respectable way, but one that typified the Warren Court. That this is now the moderate or even the conservative position is utterly disastrous.

President Trump may have one more SCOTUS appointment. The next one should not be a whitebread smiling product of the system, but another feisty Italian-American or African-American judge with principles.

Trending: German Doctor Who Was Arrested For Speaking Truth In UK Exposes Why They Are Arresting Those Exposing COVID Lies & Lockdown Tyranny

The underlying problem is that lefty judges maintain almost total fidelity to their political agenda, while conservative justices have “philosophies” and while they may be socially conservative in their own lives, allow the media to set their agenda and worldview.

These days, they’re sympathetic on some structural issues and on the Second Amendment, but are hopeless on socially conservative issues.

What SCOTUS needs are justices willing to stand athwart of history.

A narrow SCOTUS conservative majority will always offer swing votes making such courts, at best, a 50/50 proposition. And the defections are invariably on the causes that conservatives have fought hardest for and that will hurt them the most down the road.

Article posted with permission from Daniel Greenfield

Become an insider!

Sign up to get breaking alerts from Sons of Liberty Media.

Don't forget to like SonsOfLibertyMedia.com on Facebook, Google+, & Twitter.
The opinions expressed in each article are the opinions of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect those of SonsOfLibertyMedia.com.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Trending on The Sons of Liberty Media

Send this to a friend