Right there is all you need to know about where Muslims like Omar and others want to take America, straight to totalitarian Islamic Sharia. The Hill, far from some right-wing news outlet simply made reference to the fact that Omar shared a “Muslim verse” in a tweet following the attack in New Zealand, and apparently, Omar took offense that they would actually call it a “Muslim verse.” She then blasted them claiming they were “lazy and ‘othering,'” whatever that is, and claimed victim status by suggesting The Hill was claiming Muslims weren’t allowed to pray.
Omar’s tweets were caught by Twitchy.
We’re old enough to have attended school back before terms like “intersectionality” and “marginalization” had taken over the curriculum, so we didn’t see the carefully placed dog-whistle in The Hill’s tweet about Rep. Ilhan Omar reciting a Muslim verse in the aftermath of the Christchurch mass shooting. Maybe you’ll catch it.
Ilhan Omar shares Muslim verse after New Zealand mosque shootings: ‘We must not live in fear” https://t.co/BRzmJ78uma pic.twitter.com/NHmjETh9iL
— The Hill (@thehill) March 15, 2019
Here’s the tweet on which The Hill was reporting:
Inna lilahi wa inna ilayhi raji’un. This is chilling news to wake up to. In the face of this horror, I’m mourning with, and holding our community extra close today.
We must not live in fear. I will be at Jumu’ah today and I hope others will too. Jummah Mubarak.
— Ilhan Omar (@IlhanMN) March 15, 2019
Now she’s accusing The Hill of “otherizing” her and other Muslims by pointing out she shared a Muslim verse.
What is a “Muslim verse”?
Why did you have a need to signal it out?
And more importantly, are Muslims not allowed to say a prayer for our dead?
This is lazy and “othering”. Do better!
Astaghfirullah ????????♀️ https://t.co/B8otmRHZzh
— Ilhan Omar (@IlhanMN) March 16, 2019
First, our guess is that a Muslim verse is a verse said by Muslims, and second, where the hell did she get the idea that The Hill was suggesting that Muslims aren’t allowed to say a prayer for their dead?…
Why would this even be an issue for Omar? Because she is secretly pushing the idea that Muslims are to be revered, exalted above typical Americans and bowed down before. Ain’t gonna happen though, except for those who self-censor and the media.
With that in mind, author Robert Spencer points out that The Hill is “going to have to learn the new rules.”
“As a Sharia-observant Muslim, Ilhan Omar is a victim. She is therefore never to be questioned, challenged, or contradicted. She is to be treated at all times and in all circumstances with adulatory praise. Even to note her activities in a neutral manner is “othering” and enhances her victim status, and probably makes you responsible for the New Zealand massacre. Ilhan Omar is our new master. Bow down!”
Jihad Jew-hater Ilhan Omar has accused already sharia-compliant The Hill with “othering” her because they used the term “Muslim Verse” — in a positive light, I might add. Of course, the great irony is that Omar “others” herself – with her anti-Americanism, Jew-hatred, bigamy, incestuous marriage to her brother and her relentless Islamic supremacism.
As a Jew, if someone uses the term “Jewish prayer” or “Jewish verse,” let me assure, there is nothing negative in it. This is just totalitarianism a la Islam.
This is what happens though when you let idolators like Omar and other Muslims into the spotlight. There can be no unity among the people of America when some are following the death cult of Islam and a demonic god such as Allah. Learn the lesson before it’s too late and let’s set about to remove this woman from office and pray the true and living God to deliver her from her religious delusions.
Article posted with permission from Freedom Outpost
Become an insider!
Sign up to get breaking alerts from Sons of Liberty Media.
Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.