Besides the 28 pages of the 9/11 report that still remain secret to the public for some unknown reason, the free fall speed of the takedown of Building 7 on September 11, 2001 is one of the anomalies that continues to be at the center of why many people still question the official narrative. Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, an organization representing 2,400 architects and engineers who want to see a new investigation opened into the destruction of the World Trade Center buildings, have released a parody music video to Tom Petty‘s
Free Fallin’ with several clips that challenge the official narrative Americans were given regarding Building 7.
According to the group, they want others to create their own titling them “‘Free Fallin’ starring Building 7.”
“Twenty-seven years after the release of this beautiful song, it provides a perfect platform to bring attention to the troubling destruction of World Trade Center Building 7, which came down in free fall late in the afternoon on September 11, 2001,” reads the description by ae911truth. “According to the official account of 9/11, Building 7 collapsed due to normal office fires ignited by falling debris from WTC 1 (structural damage and diesel fuel fires did not contribute to the collapse, according to the government). However, scientific and circumstantial evidence strongly contradicts that explanation.”
“The fact that Building 7 instantaneously entered free fall – the acceleration of gravity – for a period of 2.25 seconds over a distance of eight stories is very strong evidence of controlled demolition,” the description continues. “Free fall can only be achieved when there is no resistance provided by the structure below. A free-fall drop of eight stories indicates that all 81 columns in Building 7 were simultaneously severed over eight stories. Only explosives can account for this kind of structural failure. Indeed, fires have never caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise, let alone in the manner of a classic controlled demolition.”
To demonstrate just what kind of predictability it would have taken to determine the entire collapse of Building 7 in the manner it did, AE911Truth provided this analogy.
“The infinitely small chance of a fire-induced failure bringing down the entire building – in particular, through the improbable series of structural failures which the government alleges caused the collapse – cannot be reconciled with the strong foreknowledge on the part of local authorities that Building 7 would eventually collapse (which the video highlights prominently). If Building 7 actually collapsed from fire, the authorities’ prediction of Building 7’s collapse would be analogous to confidently and correctly predicting one specific lottery ticket to win the lottery.”
“The inexplicable foreknowledge on the part of authorities is made all the more apparent by the inability of the engineering community to explain it after the fact,” they continue. “Nine months after the collapse, FEMA would state, ‘The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time…. [T]he best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence.’ More than four years after the collapse, the government’s lead investigator would state, ‘[T]ruthfully, we don’t really know. We’ve had trouble getting a handle on building No. 7.'”
“In reality, the warnings of Building 7’s imminent demise must have originated from someone who knew that Building 7 was going to be brought down in a controlled demolition,” the Architects and Engineers conclude. “Beyond that, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, which represents over 2,400 architectural and engineering professionals, does not speculate on who brought down Building 7 or why. Instead, we are dedicated to educating the public about the destruction of all three World Trade Center buildings with the expectation that others with the responsibility and authority to conduct a proper investigation will do so.”
As a result of just the evidence surrounding this one building, many more Americans are rethinking 9/11 and the official story that they have been told.