Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

MENU

Behold a Pale Gun Confiscation Agenda

Written by:

Published on: October 5, 2015

Our nation continues to unravel at an alarming pace. We are now living in a society that seems devoid of all hope for the future as we continue to chug along on the fundamental transformation choo choo train promised by President Obama. To the average person who pays no attention to the fine details, America seems to be a place where mass violence occurs on a daily basis, white people are the most privileged in society and hateful of all other races, everyone is living under the brutal, unfair practices of a capitalistic society, and America continues to rape the natural world for resources causing global warming. These false beliefs have caused the unwashed masses to demand change, and, in many cases (as demonstrated by movements like Occupy Wall Street), the change they are demanding is socialism. This is what you get when a community organizer is elected president. The very purpose of community organizing is to whip up hate and discontent for the purpose of obtaining political power, period. It is a tactic that was finely tuned by none other than Saul Alinsky and executed perfectly by Barack Obama. The whole idea is to get people to lose hope and eventually accept things they normally wouldn’t. Is it possible that the same tactic is being used in the never-ending fight against the second amendment? Can Americans be pushed to the point where they will willingly accept gun confiscation? Sadly, that is the agenda being employed against us and in true Alinsky form; the ends justify the means, no matter what they are.

Community Organizing tactic called institutional deviance: To destroy the structure of apathy by stirring up dissatisfaction and discontent; disrupt existing complacent expectations, and breaking down the individualistic orientations of community residents. “The practice of Macro Social Work.” 

Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and chance the future. –Rules for Radicals

Affecting social change generally works on the principles defined in the Hegelian dialectic, which is otherwise known as the problem, reaction, solution strategy. Those in power that are seeking change deliberately cause problems in an effort to get the masses to demand the change they wish to implement. Looking at government today, it is easy to argue that this strategy is being employed on a large scale, as certain populations of people are deliberately left living in poverty while greedy politicians make promises they never keep. The end result is the continual demand that further government action be taken to solve the problem. On a larger scale yet, it could be theorized that the destruction of the economy was done on purpose so that it would be accepted as a necessary step to implement a communist economic system, which is the desired end by many in power. This is more than theory; this concept is highlighted quite well Richard Cloward’s and Frances Fox Piven’s “The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to end Poverty.” Here, the argument is that the creation of an over-bloated, unsustainable welfare state would crash the economy and force the government to provide a living wage for all. Looking at society today, it is safe to say that this is one application of the Hegelian Dialectic that is in full implementation phase.

Will this presidential election be the most important in American history?

Many people are fully aware that there is an agenda to implement full, Soviet-style gun confiscation in America. With John Kerry illegally signing the U.N. Small Arms Treaty, many know that there is a day of reckoning coming in which Americans will have to decide once and for all where they stand. The idea that many of these recent mass shootings could be “false flag” attacks against the second amendment is commonplace amongst many patriots and conspiracy theorists. Why shouldn’t it be? History proves that false flags are anything but conspiracy, as our nation has engaged in several “false flag”-style attacks that were used as justification to bring us into unwanted wars. Operation Northwoods comes to mind, as does the Gulf of Tonkin incident, which was used to bring us into Vietnam, incidentally. Northwoods was an operation in which the Joint Chiefs of Staff were considering staging attacks against the American people and then blaming it on Cuba because they wanted control of the Island. In the Gulf of Tonkin, two American destroyers were said to be attacked by Vietnamese vessels—only it never happened at all. It was a lie perpetrated by president Lyndon B. Johnson (D) and used to start a war with North Vietnam. This was declassified in 2010. While events like these seem to give credibility to the idea that our seemingly never-ending rash of mass shootings may be false flag events; the truth may have a more sinister twist on it–a truth we may be contributing to ourselves, and it all revolves around another Alinsky-style tactic.

Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian Church can live up to Christianity. –Rules for Radicals

The left has an uncanny ability to politicize any issue and make it appear as if it is a huge problem that needs to be solved. As mentioned earlier, this is the tactic of community organizing. Anything we say or do as conservatives is fair game to the left, as they twist every word and action in an effort to discredit and humiliate everything we believe in. Is it possible that the second amendment that we fight for is nothing but a political tool to the left, being used against us in a way many would never even imagine? The professional left gets away with many of the things they do because many people simply cannot comprehend the depths of their depravity. They do not understand the way that the left views concepts like principles and morality. To the left, morality itself is just a concept construed in the minds of men to justify action. Principles are nothing more than excuses used to achieve a political goal. The left believes the highest level of morality is corrupting one’s self in order to achieve the political state of “Utopia.”

In action, one does not always enjoy the luxury of a decision that is consistent both with one’s individual conscience and the good of mankind. The choice must always be for the latter. Action is for mass salvation and not for personal salvation. He who sacrifices the mass good for his personal conscience has a peculiar concept of “personal salvation.” He doesn’t care enough for the people to be corrupted for them. –Rules for Radicals

This is the depraved mind of the left. They believe—based on their own opinions, mind you—that they know what is best for society, and they are willing to engage, as evidenced by the above statement, in corrupt practices in order to achieve their goal because they know what is best for us. This means that virtually anything is possible. When it comes to the second amendment, they are using it as a political weapon, and virtually everything we do in its defense becomes fuel for their agenda in labeling us as radicals and “gun nuts” that care more about our rights than the lives of those taken in mass shooting incidents. We all know that this is not the case because we would argue that all people have an inalienable right to defend their lives; and the true act of showing no compassion towards the lives of victims is passing laws that left them defenseless in the first place. The effectiveness of mass media combined with community organizing tactics generally whips up an emotional frenzy in which people are unable to see the truth and are coaxed into simply following along. Even if the people pushing for gun confiscation are actually in the minority, the use of media and propaganda on a grand scale can give the impression to the uninformed that there is a mass movement taking place. Remember, all it takes is a tireless, irate minority to affect social change.

William Cooper was a radio talk show host and author of the book Behold a Pale Horse. His subjects included many of the same concerns conspiracy theorists share today including, one world government, population reduction, alien agendas, and, of course, gun confiscation. William Cooper was killed in a shootout with police in 2001 after the U.S. Marshall Service declared him a fugitive from justice over unpaid taxes. Cooper was, of course, convinced that the government had targeted him for his beliefs. While that can be left to pure speculation, the events that transpired at Waco and Ruby Ridge probably fueled his alleged paranoia. In chapter twelve of Behold a Pale Horse, Cooper writes of a government agenda where the proliferation of military style weapons would be deliberately allowed under the pretexts of the second amendment in an attempt to scare the masses into accepting gun confiscation. He wrote that with the use of drugs and hypnosis, people could be conditioned to perform these mass shooting events by command, i.e., brainwashing, and that people would become so fed up with the constant exposure to violence they would literally demand their rights be taken away.

The government encouraged the manufacture and importation of military firearms for the criminals to use. This is intended to foster a feeling of insecurity, which would lead the American people to voluntarily disarm themselves by passing laws against firearms. Using drugs and hypnosis on mental patients in a process called Orion, the CIA inculcated the desire in these people to open fire on schoolyards and thus inflame the antigun lobby. This plan is well under way, and so far is working perfectly. The middle class is begging the government to do away with the 2nd amendment.

Author’s Note: I have found that these events have indeed happened all over the country. In every instance that I have investigated — the incident at the women’s school in Canada, the shopping center incident in Canada, the Stockton, California, massacre, and the murder of Rabbi Meir Kahane — the shooters were all ex-mental patients or were current mental patients who were ALL ON THE DRUG PROZAC! This drug, when taken in certain doses, increases the serotonin level in the patient, causing extreme violence. Couple that with a posthypnotic suggestion or control through an electronic brain implant or microwave or E.L.F. intrusion and you get mass murder, ending in every case with the suicide of the perpetrator. Exhume the bodies of the murderers and check for a brain implant. I think you are going to be surprised. In every case the name of the murderer’s doctor or mental treatment facility has been withheld. I believe we will be able to establish intelligence-community connections and/or connections to known CIA experimental mind control programs when we finally discover who these doctors of death really are. -William Cooper, Behold a Pale Horse, pp. 225

Looking at the mass shootings we are witnessing today, they all tell the same story: a mentally disturbed person who is taking some type of mental health medication and the ease with which they are able to obtain firearms. In all of the recent shootings, there was a deliberate point on the part of the media: to reveal that the firearms were all legally purchased. This is an example of using our rules against us. We argue that background checks don’t work and that criminals will always be able to get guns. What the uniformed are seeing is a system that doesn’t prevent criminals from getting guns, and the left deliberately uses that as an excuse to push for total confiscation. For us, it becomes almost a no win situation because the left can twist anything to fit their narrative, and, as mentioned earlier, the more we fight for our gun rights, the more they are able to make us appear as if we are radicals. Don’t misunderstand; we must continue to fight for the second amendment because we all know what happens in gun confiscation scenarios. We need to turn the narrative around and show that it is those denying people the right to self-defense who are the uncompassionate ones showing no value for human life. Fortunately, this appears to be happening, and William Cooper’s predictions may turn out to be wrong. People are growing tired of the same old rhetoric by President Obama concerning gun control. There are enough incidents of gun use in self-defense to prove, beyond any doubt, the insanity of gun free zones. Americans may be slow to awaken, but they awaken, nonetheless, and they can see that no matter what gun control laws may be enacted, criminals won’t follow them. The left thinks we are stupid and, frankly, if you don’t understand that all of these shootings occur where there already is gun control, then, indeed, you are. Don’t give up the fight, America, the left is counting on you tiring out when the real fight is about to begin.

To learn more about the psychopolitical agenda and communist indoctrination check out my book Not on My Watch: Exposing the Marxist Agenda in Education.

*Article by David Risselada

Become an insider!

Sign up to get breaking alerts from Sons of Liberty Media.

Don't forget to like SonsOfLibertyMedia.com on Facebook and Twitter.
The opinions expressed in each article are the opinions of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect those of SonsOfLibertyMedia.com.

Trending on The Sons of Liberty Media