-
“The notion that we need to protect homosexuals more than we need to protect children…has been a disturbing trend.” Brian Rushfeldt, president, Canada Family Action As you may know, the radical homosexual lobby is using
-
“What is truth?”—a remarkable question considering the occasion and who was asking it. Is it appropriate for men and women who do not know the truth, nor comprehend the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God
-
In the January 2011 edition of the California Lawyer, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia correctly says the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution does not apply to sex discrimination or sexual orientation cases. 1 Activist
-
Some people are calling yesterday’s Supreme Court decision, which eventually will impose sodomy-based “marriage” on the entire country, the Roe v. Wade of homosexual “marriage.” It’s far worse
-
On Monday, the Supreme Court turned down five state appeals that sought to prohibit sodomite “marriage.” The obvious question that should be asked is why the states appeal to the federal court in the first place.
-
The story I wrote last week, about the two females who snookered Mississippi into giving them a wedding license, is going national. Media outlets like the Jackson (MS) Clarion-Ledger and extremist left winger sites like GLAAD and
-
In September, Federal Judge Martin L. C. Feldman upheld the State of Louisiana’s authority to define marriage as between a man and a woman. This ruling came after 78% of voters determined to define marriage to that effect
-
The Supreme Court will, perhaps even in this session, take up the issue of sodomy-based “marriage.” If it does, Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan will have an obligation to step off the bench for those
-
Two lesbians commit biological fraud, get married in Mississippi If there is any one thing the Mississippi constitution flatly and emphatically prohibits, it is a “marriage” between two lesbians. When the issue was on
-
Judge Richard Posner, a federal judge with the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, recently become a hero to the pro-“homosexual marriage” left when, by way of a “legal analysis” free from the troublesome