(True Conservative Pundit) Pelosi and Schumer and all the rest of the lying dishonest Democrats sang a different song not all that long ago concerning a border wall or fence.
This whole business with the obstructionist Democrats refusing to fund the border wall just gets me so angry I could literally slap these idiots. I am so tired of hearing the false and outright blatant lies concocted by the Democratic leadership. Said leadership, meaning Nancy No Mind Pelosi, and Chuck-You Schumer don’t have two brain cells to rub together between them.
Back in the mid-2000s, Schumer, Pelosi, Hillary, and others voted FOR border security in the form of a fence. Even as late as 2014, Barack Obama was heard to declare that illegals needed to be stopped, that illegal immigration was a serious detriment to this country!
Hillary Clinton was all for border security and publically said so, reminding people that when she was a Senator: “I voted numerous times when I was a Senator to spend money to build a ah, barrier to try to prevent illegal immigrants from coming in.” (1)
Bill Clinton was all for border security and addressed this issue before Congress during his State of the Union address, and received a standing ovation for doing so. (2)
Obama when a Senator said that illegals were showing disrespect for U.S. laws and that we as a country simply could not allow people to, “pour into the United States, undetected, undocumented, unchecked, and circumventing the line of people who are waiting patiently, diligently, and lawfully…” (3)
Chuck-You Schumer said: “People who enter the United States without our permission are illegal aliens and illegal aliens should not be treated the same as people who entered the U.S. legally…” (4)
President Trump yet again had a meeting with Pelosi and Schumer. Trump asked Nancy about wall funding, her answer was immediately, “no.” Trump got up and walked out of the meeting. Chuck-You Schumer instantly reported that Trump had a hissy fit and stormed out, this account of events was disputed by others in attendance at the meeting.
Even if tTrumphad stormed out of the meeting, well – big deal! Maybe that course of action would not exactly fit the posture of the office of the president, but how long can one be expected to deal with self-righteous idiots like Schumer and Pelosi?
The American People want a safe and secure border, but one would never know this by the words of the Politicrats and the disgraceful and disingenuous mainstream media. The constant negativity, the lies, the blame games, and all of it is faithfully supported by the people’s complicit and disgraceful media.
The statement that really angered this writer was recently made by none other then Nancy No Mind Pelosi. I personally cannot stand this two-faced, lying, flip-flopping with the wind, two-bit schmuck-tard who is out to destroy President Trump at all costs. Pelosi literally makes this writer sick, not only her lies and insinuations, but her outright abject stupidity.
Anyone remember this one: “We Have to Pass the Bill So That You Can Find Out What Is In It”?
Pelosi’s jab at Mitch McConnell is extremely over the top, not to mention ignorant and pathetic:
“Do you take an oath to the Constitution or an oath to Donald Trump?”
“Do you take an oath to the Constitution or an oath to Donald Trump?” Pelosi said after Senate GOP blocks House bills to reopen federal agencies
— Manu Raju (@mkraju) January 10, 2019
Nancy “No Mind” Pelosi obviously needs a refresher course concerning her oath of office. To wit:
“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.” U.S. Constitution, Article VI, clause 3 (source)
The Oath itself:
The oath used today has not changed since 1966 and is prescribed in Title 5, Section 3331 of the United States Code. It reads:
“I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” (source)
This writer has some questions for Nancy:
- Are not those crossing the border illegally “enemies” of the state?
- Where in the Constitution is it stated that “sanctuary cities” are legal?
- Where in the Constitution is it stated that all may enter the U.S. at whim, with or without the necessary legal documents?
- Where in the Constitution is it stated that drug traffickers, human traffickers, criminals, and terrorists are to be allowed into the U.S.?
- Where in the Constitution is it stated that we are NOT to defend our sovereign borders?
So while at least some of the Republicans are standing with President Trump to defend our country from these illegal, violent, immoral, drug pushing, human trafficking, murdering people, who drain our resources that are meant for Americans – Nancy No Mind Pelosi and Chuck-You Schumer defend the rights of these future Democrat illegals to come here.
While Pelosi and Schumer grandstand and defend the “rights” of illegals, Republicans are trying to safeguard our nation against these people that have no business being here in the first place.
This writer simply cannot understand how the Politicrats can look at themselves in the mirror and sleep at night when they so obviously support exactly what is destroying the United States from the inside out.
What bothers me even more than this is the fact that ignorant and/or selfish U.S. voters keep sending these traitorous fools back to public office again and again!
So who are you going to support America? The lying, self-serving Democrats, or the imperfect Republicans that at the very least support the rule of law and are looking out for the best interests of the country?
Source for quoted comments, (1) (2) (3) (4)