“Survival of the fittest should no longer be used because it discriminates against people with disabilities”
Birthing people. Womb-havers. Bleeders. People with vaginas. Now, “egg-producing”.
The words “male” and “female” should be phased out in science because they reinforce ideas that sex is binary, scientists have suggested.
“Scientists”.
Spoiler alert, none of them are scientists. They’re activists who publish papers promoting their activism.
Researchers studying ecology and evolutionary biology should be encouraged to use terms such as “sperm-producing” or “egg producing” or “XY/XX individual” to avoid “emphasising hetero-normative views”, experts say.
“Experts”. Again. There are these constant appeals to authority by radicals trying to dismantle our system of moral and intellectual authority.
There is something grimly funny about the activists denying science and biological differences who insist that sex isn’t binary, discard ‘male’ and ‘female’, and then try to replace them with terms graphically grounded in biology. No matter how much you play with words, Dylan Mulvaney isn’t going to produce any eggs.
Hetero-normative is simply a scientific reality.
Even one of the most famous scientific concepts of all time, the “survival of the fittest”, should no longer be used because it discriminates against people with disabilities and is linked to eugenics, they advise.
At the rate we’re going, that one is going to be field tested before too long.
Oh, I forgot, we’re not allowed to say field testing anymore. That’s been deemed racist.
Article posted with permission from Daniel Greenfield
