Geert Wilders, Dutch Parliamentarian and leader of the Party for Freedom in The Netherlands, has come under attack from those complicit in the migration of Islamists into the West and those seeking to promote Islam as a “religion of peace” despite its history and its teachings.
More and more, Wilders is being vindicated for his stand against Islamic jihad. The latest comes in the form of a Pew Research Study on Muslim migration.
“The bell is tolling for Europe,” said Wilders. “All the warning signs are turned on red. A demographic catastrophe is in the making. If Europe fails to make a stand, its Judeo-Christian civilization is about to be blown away.”
“And now a Pew research study has verified that even if the mass influx of Muslim refugees into Europe ended now, that the Muslim population will continue to surge,” added Wilders. “We must have the courage to protect our borders and introduce travel bans, as President Trump is doing in the US.”
Thing is, though the Caliphate dream is dead in the Middle East, those adhering to the demonic doctrines of Islam are permeating Western culture, and they are growing in numbers.
Robert Spencer wrote about this very issue taking place in Europe.
The Islamic State did not have in mind just a few jihadis crossing from Libya: it also emerged last February that the jihadis planned to flood Europe with as many as 500,000 refugees. Now the number is shooting well beyond that in Germany alone. Of course, not all of these refugees are Islamic jihadis. Not all are even Muslims, although most are. However, no effort whatsoever is being made to determine the refugees’ adherence to Sharia and desire to bring it to their new land. Any such effort would be “Islamophobic.” Yet there are already hints that the Islamic State is putting its plan into effect: jihadis have already been found among the refugees trying to enter Europe. There will be many more such discoveries.
Eight hundred thousand Muslim refugees in one year alone. This will transform Germany, and Europe, forever, overtaxing the welfare economies of its wealthiest nations and altering the cultural landscape beyond recognition. Yet the serious public discussion that needs to be had about this crisis is shouted down by the usual nonsense: the Washington Post Wednesday published an inflammatory and irresponsible piece likening those concerned about this massive Muslim influx into Europe to 1930s Nazis ready to incinerate Jews by the millions. Hollywood star Emma Thompson accused British authorities of racism for not taking in more refugees – as if British authorities haven’t already done enough to destroy their nation.
And so it goes. If you don’t accept the brave new world that is sure to bring more jihad and more Sharia to Europe, you’re a Nazi and a racist. Meanwhile, no one is bothering even to ask, much less answer, one central question: why is it incumbent upon Europe have to absorb all these refugees? Why not Saudi Arabia or the other Muslim countries that are oil-rich and have plenty of space? The answer is unspoken because non-Muslim authorities refuse to believe it and Muslims don’t want it stated or known: these refugees have to go to Europe because this is a hijrah.
This is also Europe’s death knell.
Wilders, two years after Spencer, is pointing out what is taking place today and referencing the Pew Research study.
“The figures are truly dramatic,” he wrote. “Unless there are radical changes to the present policies towards immigration, 30.6% of the population in Sweden will be Islamic by the middle of the century. Sweden is as good as finished.”
A projected 193% growth by 2050, with Sweden expected to hit 30 per cent Muslim https://t.co/ASDSA2CRpK
— Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) November 30, 2017
“But the situation elsewhere is hardly better,” he added. “19.7% in Germany, 18% in France, 17.2 % in Britain, and 15.2% in the Netherlands. This is what Pew expects to happen if the migration patterns continue at the 2014-2016 levels. Pew also calculated what will happen if the current refugee crisis comes to an end but regular immigration continues at present level.”
“Under this scenario, the number of Muslims by 2050 is still bound to rise to 20.5% in Sweden, 17.4% in France, 16.7% in the UK, 12.5% in the Netherlands, and 10.8% in Germany,” Wilders continued.
He then mentioned exactly how the representatives the people elect are the ones who are complicit in the destruction of their culture.
“Last week, I posted a tweet with a picture from the Pew report, accompanied by the text ‘An existential problem: our population is being replaced. And it will get much worse if we don’t de-Islamise soon!’” he wrote. “A few hours later, the tweet was censored in France. In the country of President Emmanuel Macron, the people are not allowed to know the truth.”
Sadly, it’s happening everywhere, even in America, as Google, Facebook, and Twitter seek to be censors of what you are allowed to see, read and listen to regarding the truth about Islam and jihad.
Mr. Wilders also cited numbers of Muslims who are entering Europe who refuse to assimilate into the society and believe that Islam and Islamic law is more important than Europe’s laws.
Recent academic studies indicate that the vast majority of European Muslims find their Islamic rules more important than Europe’s secular democratic laws, while significant numbers (up to 11% in the Netherlands according to the University of Amsterdam) find it acceptable to use violence in the name of Islam.
More Islam means more violence and intolerance.
Unfortunately, Europe’s demographics might shift even more rapidly than Pew predicts. As Breitbart London pointed out, immigration trends tend to be at – and often beyond – the highest projections established by migration observatories. Moreover, Pew seems to be cautious in its calculations.
Wilders then took a shot at the policy of the EU in allowing the mass invasion disguised as migration.
“The EU policy is a march of folly,” he wrote. “More than six million migrants are currently waiting in countries around the Mediterranean to cross into Europe. Because they break in through the back windows, the EU is opening the front door of ‘the house of Europe.’”
“This is not what we want,” he continued. “We have to stop the suicidal madness of the EU elites. We must stop the millions wanting to come to the ‘house of Europe’ because this house is our house.”
“If we leave the door open, we will soon be driven out of it,” he warned. “We will lose our identity and our freedom. Our existence is at stake. We must safeguard it. This can only be done if we have to courage to adopt a new strategy. As Winston Churchill said: ‘Courage is the greatest virtue because it guarantees all the rest.’”
He then elaborated on exactly what courage means in this situation.
“Instead of acting as a magnet to young Africans and Asians, Europe has to have the courage to be exactly the opposite,” Wilders penned. “We must have the courage to protect our borders and introduce travel bans, as President Trump is doing in the US.”
“The courage to send every boat with illegal migrants back, as Australia does,” he conlcuded. “The courage to restrict legal immigration instead of expanding it. The courage to start the immediate repatriation of illegal immigrants. The courage to de-Islamize, and be unwelcoming to Islam. Instead of being soft, Europe must be tough. If we fail, our national identity will be in danger, our freedom will be in jeopardy, the Europe we know will cease to exist. And, as the Pew figures show, it will cease to exist soon.”
Sadly, many are comparing the warnings concerning Muslim migration with Germany and the Jews. This is a far cry from that as Christine Douglass-Williams writes.
Two years ago, the Washington Post published an article entitled: “Europe’s fear of Muslim refugees echoes rhetoric of 1930s anti-Semitism,” which — as is evident from the title — compared those who have concerns about the massive Muslim influx into Europe to the Nazis of the 1930’s, ready to murder Jews by the millions. The article absurdly stated that “part of that hostility was fueled, as some of the European grievances are now, by stereotypes of the refugees as harbingers of a dangerous ideology.”
Comparison of Muslims and Jews has become an offensive habit among groups that are advancing their pro-migration agenda. It was Muslims, including the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, who worked with the Nazis toward their goal of wiping out the Jewish race. It is eyebrow raising that even some Jews of today — whose families experienced the Holocaust — indulge in such bizarre comparisons between Nazism and responsible concerns about the Muslim hijrah. The Jews were targeted only because of their race, and lies were spun against them to fan the flames of racism, hatred and ultimately mass murder.
Muslims are not being targeted because of intolerance. Islam is not a race. Mass Muslim migration into Europe has proven to be a menace; given valid security threats posed to European society and culture, there is reason to be troubled about their hijrah into Europe, and more broadly, into the West. No one would have thought that in so short a space of time, Europe would house sharia patrols, sharia courts, proliferating and expanding no-go zones, and would be home to harmful cultural practices including FGM, honor violence, the religiously mandated taking of infidel women through mass rapes. Muslim hate preachers openly proclaim doctrines of death for apostasy, homosexuality, as well as call for death to Jews and preach the inferior status of women (including wife beating and spousal rape). Now drives to shut down free speech using the victimhood narrative of “Islamophobia” is ever-expanding. More important is the historically expansionist Islamic ideology that divides the world into two camps: the House of War (Dar al harb) and the House of Islam (Dar al Islam).
The warning is clear: God has said that those who abandon His covenant and His law are going to receive curses and among those curses is the influx of foreigners and them becoming the head while the previous occupants of the land become the tail (Deuteronomy 28:15-68).