How Does The Mainstream Media Have The American People Talking About A Death Sentence When All Legitimate Evidence Of The Crime Has Been Erased & Removed By the Accusers? Time To Ask Questions, People
“He that is first in his own cause seemeth just; but his neighbour cometh and searcheth him.” – Proverbs 18:17
I have a simple question for the reader, real simple: How is it that the mainstream media has gotten the American people into a courtroom looking to have an individual (regardless of who they accuse) put to death without the evidence of the crime committed? This is especially true knowing the history and lies (misinformation, editorial bias, and the omission of critical contexts) that the mainstream media is responsible for promulgating (John 8:44).
The evidence in question should be laid at the feet of the people to decide for themselves.
A video recently released by Unearthy Enigma highlights what I mean for you to question.
Why is there no video of Charlie being brought into the hospital?
Why was no autopsy performed and no coroner’s report released publicly? The narrative changed after the audio below was brought forth.
Audio:
Why is there no official death certificate?
Why no burial site?
Why was the stadium where Charlie’s Memorial was held booked four months before the event?
Why was the original video of the assassination removed (obvious tampering)? Look at all the blood (?).
Why, from the angle shot from behind that was released months later, is there no trace of any blood whatsoever?
Why is there no trail of blood from the crime scene to the truck?
Why were the paramedics in the footage blocked from aiding Charlie Kirk?
Why was the evidence immediately and illegally tampered with and the entire crime scene erased within hours?
Why was CCTV evidence wiped away with surgical precision?
Why is there no detailed Ballistics report?
Why is there not one verified eyewitness on the official record speaking freely?
Why was Charlie’s body secretly removed and illegally flown out on Air Force 2 with Vice President Vance helping carry the casket like it was some state funeral?
Why did FBI Director Kash Patel remove FBI’s Mehtab Syed (Former agents called her “absolutely the best in the bureau”) in that district just days before?
Why did a whistleblower report to Congress, the same director who tweeted the suspect was in custody, this, before he was, and then backtracked?
Why was a book titled “The Shooting of Charlie Kirk” released on September 9, 2025, in great detail as to what allegedly happened on the 10th?
The list of questions concerning the obvious continues to be dodged and unanswered by the said accusers.
So, in conclusion, how is it that the accusers here, the ones removing and erasing the evidence, have the American people in a courtroom eager to see someone pay for a crime that they have no evidence to prove?
How is it that anyone could dare say theory in asking questions concerning the lies that the accusers fail to prove?
The burden of proof is on the accusers to prove guilt and to bring forth legitimate evidence of the crime, yet that is what they are not doing, which is quite telling, is it not (Jeremiah 11:9)?
