Since yesterday, the news media has buzzed, exchanging rhetoric, criticism and examination of Hussein Soetoro’s executive actions on gun control. It’s quite a circus to see these clowns juggling the executive actions against already unconstitutional gun legislation and unconstitutional government agency “rules” while ignoring the simple, but clear, limitation on government contained in the Second Amendment. But, where the interest really lies is in the news report questioning Hussein Soetoro’s mental capability to occupy the Oval Office and a mental illness that prevents this tyrant from possessing a firearm under his own decrees.

In 2014, psychology expert Gina Loudon questioned the sanity of Hussein Soetoro, citing the disorder of narcissism (Narcissistic Personality Disorder) and irrational behavior suggesting mental instability. Hussein Obama has exhibited several symptoms of several mental disorders. However, it doesn’t take an expert in psychology to determine whether Hussein Soetoro possesses the mental stability to remain in office, according to the Twenty-fifth Amendment.

“The Twenty-fifth Amendment and Barack Obama’s Mental Illness,” published on Freedom Outpost in June of 2014, outlined the mental disorders and illnesses Hussein Soetoro could suffer that warrants his removal from office under Section 4 of the Twenty-fifth Amendment. Congress possesses the power to declare the President of the united States “unfit” to discharge his duties, allow the Vice President to assume duties of the President and determine whether the president can resume or forfeit his duties based on capability. As stated in the article, this will not occur as congressional members suffer from some of the same disorders.

The rule of law and support for it, the Constitution, has been lacking in Washington, DC for quite some time. The sheer purposeful willful intent of members of Congress to support lawlessness on a consistent basis suggests all have mental defects, all are traitors or it is a combination of both. Either way, government sitting in Washington, DC has become dysfunctional. Congress refuses to do their duty to impeach or remove Hussein Soetoro based on the Twenty-fifth Amendment, which means citizens will have their rights infringed upon for normal behaviors now determined indicative of mental illness.

Psychologists have turned the mental illness basket upside down to declare deviant, aberrant behavior as normal and normal behaviors as deviant or indicative of mental illness. This is no more clear than the addition of “Oppositional Defiant Disorder” for adults and children in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: Fifth Edition” or DSM-V. Defined as the “recurrent pattern of negativistic, defiant, disobedient, and hostile behavior toward authority figures,” which typically begins at a young age but can survive into adulthood,” this diagnosis could potentially result in the denial of the right to bear arms to individuals criticizing the government.

“But even scarier, the newest version of the DSM-V is so broad that almost every form of human behavior could be considered some type of mental illness.”

And, this is where the specialty of psychiatry and psychology has become more dangerous. When government and these specialties converge, as we have witnessed in the past and present, it presents another danger to the people. This isn’t confined to the specialties of psychiatry or psychology either.

General medical physicians routinely will use the diagnostic listings contained in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD-9 and ICD-10) to code someone as “depressed,” “stressed,” “anxious” or having “attention deficit disorder.” Many times, it is done to further justify their fees and billing practices. With Obamacare and the government having access to medical records, this seemingly insignificant practice on the part of physicians could have devastating effects for citizens.

Individuals for one reason or another can experience these feelings of stress, anxiety or depression for transient reasons. A physician’s appointment occurring during one of these episodes can have a patient incorrectly labeled. Once in the hands of government, that record could be used to limit an individual’s rights. Not surprisingly, diagnosing individuals with some type of “mental disorder” is not limited to physicians.

Teachers and school administrators are participating in “armchair psychiatry” by labeling children exhibiting a more robust normal behavior as indicative of some type of attention disorder. Based on their “assessment,” parents rush their children to the physician, who confirms this supposition and prescribes unnecessary medication. The schools are now filled with a generation of individuals deemed inattentive or hyperactive, which can be used to deny them their God-given rights or limit their “privileges.”

As Infowars.com reports:

In fact, over the past 50 years, the number of mental illnesses defined by sequential editions of the DSM have grown from 130 to over 350.

The rise in children diagnosed with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD/ADD), for example, is mainly due to the newest DSM editions reclassifying certain, normal behaviors as “symptoms.”

…

And looking back at the Soviet Union, the communist regime routinely diagnosed those critical of the government as “mentally ill.”

“People who didn’t accept the beliefs of the Communist Party developed a ‘new type’ of schizophrenia,” the popular blog site The Mind Unleashed pointed out. “They suffered from the ‘delusion’ of believing communism was wrong.”

“They were isolated, forcefully medicated, and put through repressive ‘therapy’ to bring them back to sanity.”

George F. Will, writing in the Washington Post, surmised that a 7-year-old Mozart, if living today, might be diagnosed with ADD or ADHD, resulting in being medicated into mental numbing of his exceptional musical ability.

Government and Big Pharma are the winners in this agenda.

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist, someone with 20 initials behind their name or 10 college degrees to figure out where this is leading. Diagnosing of children with a “mental disorder,” coupled with the Hussein Soetoro decrees, means a generation of individuals denied from exercising their Second Amendment rights. It means a generation of children medicated into submission, more conducive to suggestion. Once an adult, the diagnosis could be continued.

For adults, the designation of “normal” behaviors as “mental disorders” would be used as a weapon against political dissidents, those who uphold the principles of liberty, those who protest against the crimes of government or government officials, those who expose government psy-ops, false flags and agendas, and those who document, speak and write about it all. Others who refrain from these activities could find themselves on some government list, unbeknownst to them, that prevents an exercise of God-given rights. Due process will become a principle relegated to the past.

The road is being paved by government through unlawful, illegal, unconstitutional means to gun confiscation. If that is successful, history shows genocide follows when dictators, suffering from mental illness, rule a nation.

The scenarios proposed are dependent on the mentally unstable, mentally ill Hussein Soetoro continuing his term in office and Congress allowing his dictatorial edicts to stand. Judging from the behavior of Congress in the past, the status quo will continue. Nothing should be discounted from possibility with the current administration, Congress, and department and agency heads. Citizens should prepare for the worst, hope for the best, repent for our sins and pray for God’s mercy.