Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Independent Claims Jihadi was Inspired by Tommy Robinson, David Wood, Robert Spencer

Written by:

Published on: February 21, 2020

Lizzie Dearden of the UK’s Independent thinks that if we all pretend that Islam is a religion of peace and never speak about its teachings calling for warfare against unbelievers and their subjugation under the rule of Islamic law, jihad activity will go away. For there are, in Dearden’s charmed world, apparently no Muslims preaching violence in the name of Islam; she would have us believe that only Muslims do that.

That is the point of this spectacularly ridiculous article about how jihad terrorist Mohiussunnath Chowdhury (pictured above), who attacked police with a sword outside Buckingham Palace and whose hate and bloodlust I have covered a great deal over at Jihad Watch, claims he learned from Tommy Robinson, David Wood and me.

It’s a bit eye-popping to see us falsely accused of inciting violence by a Muslim, when usually we’re falsely accused of inciting violence against Muslims, but there it is. Dearden readily repeats Chowdhury’s claims in her article as if they were completely on the level, and intones piously on Twitter: “Those on the right who are spouting the same theological claims as Islamists should take a hard look at themselves.” She would have us believe that Chowdhury learned from us that Islam teaches violence, but entirely missed all the material we present about how those teachings make people behave monstrously, and that Sharia is bad for individuals and societies, etc.

It’s easy to see the reason for this selective reading. Apparently the establishment media has simply decided that Tommy, David and I are awful people — “far-right,” of course, for the crime of opposing jihad violence and Sharia oppression of women — and “journalists” such as Dearden don’t care how much they have to tie themselves into logical knots to establish this.

Trending: We Will All Be Tested...Soon

Dearden is not entirely divorced from reality, but the papers have been served and the proceedings are well advanced. She does mention in a single paragraph that Chowdhury was inspired by Anwar al-Awlaki and Sheikh Faisal, but gives over her headline and 21 paragraphs to trying to convince her readers that Robinson, Wood and I inspired Chowdhury.

Her guiding assumption in this, of course, is that Islam is a Religion of Peace, which Robinson, Wood and I are misinterpreting and thereby validating the jihadist interpretation — as if Chowdhury would have been a peaceful, loyal, productive British citizen if he hadn’t run afoul of our writings telling him the Qur’an taught violence.

If that were so, why were no Muslim clerics, with whom Chowdhury was manifestly in contact, unable to convince him of the true, peaceful Islam? Why was there jihad violence for 1,400 years before Tommy, David, or I wrote or said anything? If we validated the jihadist interpretation of Islam, where did it come from, and why did it have so much resonance among Muslims before we came along?

Dearden also calls Jihad Watch a “conspiracy blog” that “claims Muslims are trying to ‘destroy western societies and impose Islamic law’, and seeks to prove that violent jihad is mandated by the Quran.”

Well, some Muslims are certainly trying to destroy Western societies and impose Islamic law. Lizzie Dearden should know that, since Mohiussunnath Chowdhury is one of them. Meanwhile, can she document one “conspiracy theory” we spread at Jihad Watch? Can she show how we have misrepresented, misquoted, or misinterpreted the Qur’an? Of course not, and she doesn’t even try. She is, after all, an establishment media “journalist.”

I asked her the same question and some others on Twitter; she ignored the questions. Nowadays, you see, a “journalist” need not seek out the people she is writing about for comment; neither does she have any obligation to explain or justify her defamation of them. The Independent, like the rest of the establishment media today, is not even remotely a genuine news organization. It is just a propaganda arm for the hard-Left.

Lizzie Dearden knows this. I know it as well. You know it. But like its propagandistic colleagues, the Independent is staking its declining fortunes on the hope that there are some naïve and uninformed people still out there who still believe it is a news outlet, and will obediently take away from Dearden’s article the idea that if we all just shut up about jihad and pretend that Islam is peaceful, then it will be. The consequences of this fantasy and wishful thinking could be quite literally explosive, as jihadis will without any doubt continue recruiting peaceful Muslims to their cause even after foes of jihad violence are silenced. Does Lizzie Dearden care about that? It’s unlikely she would risk venturing so deeply into “Islamophobia.”

Article posted with permission from Robert Spencer

Become an insider!

Sign up to get breaking alerts from Sons of Liberty Media.

Don't forget to like SonsOfLibertyMedia.com on Facebook, Google+, & Twitter.
The opinions expressed in each article are the opinions of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect those of SonsOfLibertyMedia.com.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Trending on The Sons of Liberty Media

Send this to a friend