Disclaimer – This is for informational and educational purpose only and does not constitute legal or medical advice.
In the first two Parts of Informed Consent, it was covered what it means for informed consent and its process, and how it is we can be considered to be living in Auschwitz.
To truly make the point on informed consent so it is understood, consider the following.
In the 1930s Nazi Germany, a “law” was enacted to forcibly sterilize anyone suffering from genetic blindness and deafness, manic depression, schizophrenia, epilepsy, congenital feeble-mindedness, some brain disorders, and alcoholism. Institutionalized individuals were also forcibly sterilized despite being disassociated from society. Eugenics played a big role in this “law” as well as the German ideology of the German people as one, or Volk. Individual needs became secondary to the needs and importance of the Volk. The thinking was if there were an unhealthy individual within the Volk, or something that could harm the Volk, it had to be resolved.
The main target of the sterilization program were those people who were not in the asylums but had a slight hereditary illness and who were of reproductive age (between 12 and 45). Since these people were among society, they were deemed the most dangerous.
Since slight hereditary illness is rather ambiguous and the category “feeble-minded” is extremely ambiguous, people sterilized under those categories included those the German elite didn’t like for their asocial or anti-Nazi beliefs and behavior.
The belief in stopping hereditary illnesses soon expanded to include all the people within the east whom Hitler wanted eliminated. If these people were sterilized, the theory went, they could provide a temporary workforce as well as slowly create Lebensraum (room to live for the German Volk).
Informed consent and permission for these interventions were negated by a “law” (Matthew 23).
The Germans were not the creators of nor the first to implement governmentally-sanctioned forced sterilization (Genesis 1:28; 9:1, 7). The United States, for instance, had already enacted sterilization laws in half its states by the 1920s which included forced sterilization of the immigrants, Black and Indigenous people, poor people, Puerto Rican people, poor White people, incarcerated people, and those living with disabilities (Acts 10:34-35).
It was the US Supreme Court who in an 8 to 1 decision in 1927 opined to uphold a “state’s right” to forcibly sterilize a person considered unfit to procreate. On the opinion and vote of eight people in black robes, the right to informed consent to sterilization was negated AND awarded the States as the arbiters of determining who could and could not procreate. The Supreme Court decision is still in effect. Currently, 31 States have forced sterilization laws on the books. You can find out about your State here. This is current as of 2022.
In case you don’t know, the State does not possess “rights”; States are provided “authorities” by the consent of the governed. Did you give the State the authority to determine who could procreate and who could be sterilized? No, because you can’t. You have no jurisdiction over someone else’s body, only your own. The State has no jurisdiction over anyone’s body either; it created “laws”, which are pseudo-laws, by which to usurp that jurisdiction in certain circumstances in violation of God’s laws and the Constitution for the united States of America.
In the erroneous Supreme Court decision that wrongfully awarded States’ this pretended “right” and usurpation of informed consent, this is known as oligarchical dictatorship.
The question at this point that arises is “What if a majority of people voted to give their particular State authority to ‘mandate’ certain procedures, such as vaccines, sterilization, etc.?” A majority of people do not have the authority to remove God-given unalienable rights, such as informed consent, from others. If that were to occur, you would call that type of government a “democracy”. Do not try to confound the issue by throwing in the removal of certain “civil rights” as punishment for the commissions of crimes. It is a separate issue.
The murder of a baby in the womb (Proverbs 6:17) will NOT be discussed as it, too, is an entirely separate issue with its own set of ethics, morality, and legality that will not be covered here.
In the late 1970s, roughly 1979, the federal government passed legislation preventing sterilization of women without informed consent; however, it was only applied to women receiving government assistance.
The last “legal” forced sterilization took place in Oregon in 1981; however, it has been reported that the State of California forcibly sterilized individuals as recently as 2010. In 2014, Governor Jerry Brown signed legislation that prohibited the sterilization of California inmates. However, it was reported in 2021, forced sterilizations were still occurring as recently as 2020.
And can anyone forget the Tuskegee Experiment also known as the infamous syphilis study? You can read all about it doing an internet search. No informed consent was obtained and no treatment offered after it became readily available. In other words, it was a horrid experiment conducted after adoption of The Nuremberg Code by world nations post World War II.
In looking at all of this, can you see the importance of informed consent and why it should be fiercely guarded (Proverbs 1:10)? Even if it is something that would benefit you, informed consent is still in play. Simply put, if it affects you or your children, informed consent is required. No entity possesses the authority to negate or remove informed consent from anyone for any reason – overtly or covertly.
So, it seems we have been living in Auschwitz for quite some time (Psalm 50:18).
Let’s turn our attention to the public school and university systems. Previously, these systems were referred to as brainwashing and indoctrination systems. It will be explained further down shortly.
When sending children to public schools, parents expect their children to be instructed in reading, writing, arithmetic, English, science, literature, civics, and other subjects to prepare them to be productive individuals and to possibly enter the university system. In essence, you give permission, informed consent, for your child to be instructed only in those areas and attain certain skills that will prepare them for the adult world.
As has been discovered, the public school system has become an entity of brainwashing, not instruction in subjects and skills that prepare them for the adult world through study in the previously identified subjects. If you have followed Lynne Taylor, the Common Core Diva, you know that of which is being spoken. If you haven’t, you are encouraged to do so.
In today’s public school system, children are exposed to and instructed in LGBTQrstuvwxyz ideology, to include pronouns, gender bending ideology, homosexuality, and “drag queen” story hour and entertainment. Moreover, books of a pornographic nature are in school libraries to be accessed by young children under the “pretended” supposition expressed by the United Nations that children have a “right” to pornography. Lessons in equity, non-traditional families (two moms or two dads), and probably climate change are interweaved into every subject that parents do not see in the curriculum. Employees of the school encourage gender bender ideology, often hiding when a child wants a pronoun inconsistent with that child’s biological sex. Then, there is the sexualization of children through instruction in what the school terms “sex education”, but in reality, is what could be called grooming or encouraging sexual relations at a young age. Add to this mix the school system delving into body mutilation through covering “sex change” surgeries (1 Corinthians 6:19-20). Children are instilled with fear from the doom and gloom position of climate change. You’ve seen the stories and maybe you encountered it in your child’s school.
Did you give your permission, informed consent, for your child to be subjected to any of that in the public school system (Deuteronomy 6:1-10)? While some may proclaim there is such a thing as “implied consent”, there is not. You cannot have “consent” without being informed. Just because you may send your child to a public school system does not mean you have given permission or informed consent for your child to be “instructed” in any type of ideology by anyone or any entity. Informed consent cannot be implied, assumed, presumed, or “supposed”. There is no silence is consent or “what the parent doesn’t know won’t hurt them”. And, this is certainly not “the cost of sending your child to public school.”
All of this instruction in ideology in the public school system is done on “the sly”. If parents were informed ahead of time, the teachers, school board, and State know parents would not knowingly provide consent. Remember, the attainment of informed consent involves a process. Teachers, school board members, and the State know full well the process of informed consent cannot be met.
By now, some are wondering how this informed consent, which is clearly medical in nature, applies to the other areas. Brainwashing is a form of psychological operation. Children are being brainwashed at a young age by the system and those in it to acquiesce to certain ideology. As children are under the age to consent, parents have to be the ones to provide permission/informed consent for their children to have a psychological operation perpetrated upon them. Parents would not knowingly or willingly submit their children to psychological operations and States/school boards/teachers know this. This is why it is done “on the sly” and word salad is used to disguise it (1 Corinthians 14:33).
News reports, articles, and videos abound of some “parents” exposing their children to drag queen story hour, drag queen shows and parades, LGBTQrstuvwxyz ideology, gender bender promotion, “pronoun” use for gender benders, and the list goes on. In any other time, this would be considered child abuse (Romans 1:18ff). But, would a “reasonable parent” approve of their child being exposed to this in a school system curriculum? No. Moreover, there is not one individual that can show a “benefit” to the teaching of this ideology to minor children in the school system. The risks to children are enormous and the results can be dangerous. This has been demonstrated by the rape of young girls in a girls’ facility where biological males claiming to be female are allowed by the system to use the girl’s facility. The mental damage can be just as traumatizing.
How traumatizing is it for a child to see a man pretending to be a woman (Deuteronomy 22:5) expose his “man parts” when the child has not ever seen man parts? Would you give permission/informed consent for this to be happening the school system? Probably not. Yet, news reports, articles, and videos abound where this has occurred in the school system.
It is a psychological operation intended to traumatize children and/or brainwashing children to accept traumatization. Don’t forget, you are paying for the traumatization/brainwashing of children through some sort of property tax, school tax, or sales tax, as well as federal government endowments coming from fiat taxpayer dollars issued to the public school system.
Remember, the government has been engaging in mind control/mind manipulation/brainwashing of adults for years. Did you provide informed consent for the government to do so? No, because you were not asked or given an opportunity to provide it. It was perpetrated against you, knowingly, without your consent.
You can take this same tactic in looking at the university, indoctrination center, system. More than likely, you, the parent, are paying for your child’s education at a university, either through direct payments or supplementing a scholarship.
Always remember, no majority vote or law can remove the right to informed consent. The rights are God-given, and recognized, guaranteed, and protected in the Bill of Rights. The right to informed consent remains with the individual, referred to as the “people” in the Ninth Amendment. No measure of consequence, punishment, penalty, or threat is acceptable to use in order to obtain informed consent; in fact, it is prohibited.
Now that we have discussed all the violations of informed consent, the next installment will cover what can we do.
