Kamala Harris, a name that seems to have exploded into our world without a single vote cast for her. Like most dictatorships, Kamala Harris was “inserted” into her new position as a presidential candidate. But who is Kamala Harris? Is she a true freedom-loving United States citizen? Does she hold to the confines of our constitutional Republic? Does she foster a view more aligned with communist ideology? Does Kamala Harris say one thing but never mean what she says? How could Kamala Harris be tossed into the presidential race without winning a single district, state or national vote? Who inserted Kamala Harris into this position? Why did they insert Harris into this position? So many questions that the mainstream media refuses to ask or dig into. Why? Is it because if they did, they would see that Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Chuck Schumer (all Communists by the way) did not want Joe Biden for a second term because he could not direct our nation towards the Communist ideology? All these questions should have been answered before Kamala Harris was inserted into her present position. Now, let us go on from here to maybe open a few eyes and hopefully keep this Communist out of ever being in the White House.
I decided to look at her background here.
- Served as San Francisco District Attorney from 2004-2011
- Served as Attorney General of California from 2011-2017
- Was elected U.S. Senator from California in 2016
- Was elected U.S. Vice President in 2020
- Became the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee in July 2024, replacing Joe Biden on the ticket
- Views America as a nation thoroughly infested with racism
Not too bad, except that when you go to sites where she was before her high jump, it is not a pretty sight to behold. San Francisco is now a city with huge problems, homeless people all over, and crime out of control mainly due to some of her policies during her time as a district attorney from San Francisco. When she moved to Attorney General, her ideas laid waste to California while running away from our constitutional Republic. While she was U.S. Senator from California, she made the squad of Socialists look like preachers. As vice president, Kamala Harris was designated the Border Czar and since that designation, over 20 million “illegal aliens” have crossed into our nation causing havoc, killing, raping, stealing, and nearly every sort of crime that one can think of, but Kamala Harris wants to deny that she was given the job as Border Czar because she did nothing for the border except to open it up for all sorts of people to walk into our nation unvetted.
Now, let’s look into some of Kamala’s background.
Kamala Devi Harris was born to an Indian mother and a Jamaican father in Oakland, California on October 20, 1964. She is, in part, a descendant of a Jamaican slave owner, as Harris’ father, Donald J. Harris, explained in a January 2019 essay which he wrote about his family’s heritage:
“My roots go back, within my lifetime, to my paternal grandmother Miss Chrishy (née Christiana Brown, descendant of Hamilton Brown who is on record as plantation and slave owner and founder of Brown’s Town) and to my maternal grandmother Miss Iris (née Iris Finegan, farmer and educator, from Aenon Town and Inverness, ancestry unknown to me). The Harris name comes from my paternal grandfather Joseph Alexander Harris, land-owner and agricultural ‘produce’ exporter (mostly pimento or all-spice), who died in 1939 one year after I was born and is buried in the church yard of the magnificent Anglican Church which Hamilton Brown built in Brown’s Town (and where, as a child, I learned the catechism, was baptized and confirmed, and served as an acolyte).”
Harris’ mother, Shyamala Gopalan Harris, was an internationally famous cancer researcher and the daughter of P.V. Gopalan, a high-ranking Indian diplomat from the Brahmin caste. As a Los Angeles Times article described Shyamala, she was the “privileged child of foreign grad students.” She taught at universities in France, Italy and Canada, and she once told Modern Luxury magazine: “When Kamala was in first grade one of her teachers said to me, ‘You know, your child has a great imagination. Every time we talk about someplace in the world she says, Oh, I’ve been there. So I told her [the teacher], ‘Well, she has been there!’ India, England, the Caribbean, Africa—she had been there.” Modern Luxury also quoted “one of Harris’s Nob Hill friends” as saying that “her Brahmin background accounts for her ease around wealthy, powerful people.”
One thing that stands out very clearly is the fact that the Harris family were, slave owners.
Now, look at Kamala’s parents’ ideology, which shows where Kamala got her love for Communism.
Both of Harris’ parents were far leftists who, in the early 1960s, were active in the Berkeley-based Afro-American Association (AAA), which, according to one former member, consisted of many people who looked to “Fidel Castro and Che Guevara” as their “heroes.” “We would talk about Black Muslims, the liberation movements going on in Africa, everything,” this member recalls. AAA leader Donald Warden mentored two of the group’s members, Huey Newton and Bobby Seale, who in 1966 would collaborate to establish the Black Panther Party. Years thereafter, Warden — who by then had changed his name to Khalid al-Mansour — would use his influence to help Barack Obama gain admission to Harvard Law School.
This is something to behold: Kamala with parents who subscribed to the Communist fideology of the 1960s. Kamala also seems to have connections to Obama before he was inserted into the political arena. Is it kind of weird how Kamala Harris is connected to the Communist Obama throughout his career? Well, let’s continue on and show her association with many different Socialist/Communist ideologues.
The blogger/author/documentarian Trevor Loudon also lays out the facts about the radical ties of Harris’ sister, Maya:
“Harris’ sister Maya Harris was a student activist at Stanford University. She was a friend of Steve Phillips, one of the leading Marxist-Leninists on campus and a longtime affiliate of a pro-China group League of Revolutionary Struggle. According to Phillips’ blog, Political Intelligence: ‘First, let me make clear that I come out of the Left. I’ve studied Marx, Mao, and Lenin. In college, I organized solidarity efforts for freedom struggles in South Africa and Nicaragua, and I palled around with folks who considered themselves communists and revolutionaries …, and I did my research paper on the Black Panther Party.”
“After leaving Stanford in the early 1990s, Phillips led many of his comrades into the Democratic Party. He also married into the multi-billion Sandler family Golden West savings and loan fortune, which enabled the young revolutionary to buy himself considerable political influence…. In 2008, Phillips spent $10 million through his PowerPAC-plus on voter registration drives in Southern and South Western states that got his friend Barack Obama ahead of Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primary. In 2013, Phillips helped elect his old Stanford friend Cory Booker to the U.S. Senate from New Jersey. In 2018, he almost made his proteges Stacey Abrams and Andrew Gillum the governors of Georgia and Florida, respectively.
Here it is revealed that Kamala’s sister was close friends with the man who helped what reads like the who’s who of the Communist leaders within our nation, working daily to destroy our freedom and replace it with their ideas of Communism. We are going to bore you with the word Communism because that is just what Kamala Harris wants for our nation. Nothing else will do for her. Her direction is guided by the first Communist president, Barack Obama. Obama has been pulling the strings for her and guiding her throughout and will do so until he gets his 4th term through Kamala Harris who will be like Joe Biden, only a bit smarter, dragging the United States into a Communist nation if We the People do not understand what is going on with the puppet, Kamala Harris and her puppet Master, Barack Obama. Obama is very deeply involved in making her president so he may finish his job of “transforming” our nation into his dream of a Communist nation. We can make that statement because all along Kamala Harris’s career, Barack Obama has been connected in one form or another; and his Communist friends, Pelosi, Schumer, Hakeem Jefferies, and a lot more from the Communist left that are in both Houses of our Congress will move to take everything away from us. Kamala Harris has stated she will take patents away from companies and only the government will have those. Kamala has stated that she will take ALL the guns away through her “buy back” program, which when applied, will never remove guns from the criminals. There is so much more Communist ideology in Kamala Harris’s platform. However, she does steal ideas from President Trump, like no taxes on tips. It will not be long before Kamala Harris says she will not tax Social Security because Trump said it first. Kamala is like a snake in high weeds. You cannot see her true meaning until she bites you.
“Phillips is a friend of the Harris family and helped Maya Harris’ husband Tony West become associate attorney general in the Obama administration. He has also been a major sponsor of Kamala Harris’ political career. In 2003, Phillips helped elect Harris as San Francisco district attorney…. Phillips’ PowerPAC-plus helped elect Harris as California attorney general in 2010 and then to the U.S. Senate in 2016.”
Once again, we see the connection of this guy Phillips to not just Kamala Harris but to Obama and other Communist politicians. Very few talk about Kamala’s husband, Doug Emhoff, but this has to be shown because his links to Communist China are not good to have for any president or vice president. Communist China will get all the information they need from Kamala because her husband is heavily associated with them. We could also show an extremely heavy connection to the Communist Chinese and with Tim Walz, too. However, that is another article.
Harris’ husband, Doug Emhoff, is an attorney with the law firm DLA Piper, which, according to Natalie Winters in the National Pulse, “boasts nearly 30 years of experience in China and over 140 lawyers dedicated to its ‘China Investment Services’ branch.” Adds Winters:
“To facilitate DLA Piper’s China practice—which has received countless prestigious awards from the China Business Law Journal and China Law and Practice—the company employs a host of former Chinese Communist Party officials.
“Ernest Yang, who serves as the firm’s Head of Litigation & Regulatory department and Co-Head of International Arbitration, was appointed to the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) in 2013. The CPPCC serves as the top advisory board for the Chinese Communist Party, and Yang was promoted to the body’s Standing Committee in 2019.
“Jessica Zhao, a Senior Advisor, served as the Deputy Secretary-General of the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC), a government-owned body established by the Chinese Communist Party in 1956. It was developed under the auspices of the China Council for the Promotion of International Trade, ‘a governmental body for the furtherance of Chinese trade promotion.’”
Several other high-level employees of DLA Piper have served the Chinese regime in various capacities.
If you think Communist China has inroads now with Hunter Biden, if Harris is elected, Communist China will open an office within the White House with Emhoff. That connection is not going to be shown by any media because they want to have a Communist nation where they can control all the information and get rich off the government while making everyone else poor and all you have to do is look down to her father and his Marxist ideology on economics.
From Kamala Harris’ Father Was a ‘Marxist Economist’?
“His research focused on economic inequality,” one person claimed.
Claim:
U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris’ father was a marxist economist.
Rating: True
Starting with Fowe, we found her biography on the website of one her previous employers, the German think tank Das Progressive Zentrum, which described her focus on “issues in the field of democratization of the economy and post-Keynesian economics in times of financialization dynamics.”
This detail is important because Donald J. Harris, a professor of economics at Stanford University, also did his research from a post-Keynesian perspective. Fowé was noting his line of inquiry admiringly. Keynesians stipulate that markets alone cannot ensure full employment and instead advocate for government intervention. Post-Keynesians agree, but argue that in intervening, the government should focus on equality and redistribution of wealth.
The post-Keynesian school of economics finds its roots in “The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money” — a 1936 book by economist John Maynard Keynes. In his book, Keynes attacked classical economics, which was the orthodoxy — that is, the mainstream — of the time.
Keynes’ main argument was that, contrary to classical economics’ assumption, markets alone would never ensure full employment because employment depends on demand — that is, the amount of money people and companies spend on available goods and services. He said that the psychology of markets was too volatile to manage. Instead, Keynes advocated for government intervention to stabilize the economy. For example, his recommendation for getting out of the 1930s Great Depression was that governments should simultaneously spend more and cut taxes.
From Keynes, three schools of thought emerged: Neo-Keynesians, new Keynesians and post-Keynesians. Neo-Keynesianism supporters, who focus on growth and stability rather than full employment, were the mainstream — or the orthodoxy — in the 1950s and 1960s. In the 1980s and 1990s, new Keynesians took the spotlight. New Keynesians argued that due to the fact that prices and wages are “rigid” — they don’t move easily as others schools of thought assume they do — unemployment and monetary policy (interest rates and money supply) have a much larger impact on demand.
Post-Keynesianism, which also evolved from Keynesianism, is in the heterodoxy — outside of the mainstream. Like Keynesianism, it assumes that markets alone cannot ensure full employment, and that the government must stimulate demand. But to post-Keynesians, the dimension of equality, classes and economic power is very important. Therefore, they are very concerned with distribution of income — how a country’s wealth is distributed among its inhabitants.
The title of Harris’ 1978 book, “Capital Accumulation and Income Distribution,” illustrates this concern. Harris was also preoccupied with exploitation and other concepts that came directly from Karl Marx’s theory of capital. For example, The Economist recounts that he once argued that the inequality that beset Black people in the U.S. did not come from a form of “colonial rule” where white people dominate. Instead, he argued that the problem was capitalism. In this sense, Harris was indeed marxist in his thinking.
In fact, a 2019 paper in Elgar Online argued that “Marx should not be considered as an ‘early post-Keynesian’ but rather as an important forerunner of modern post-Keynesianism, with certain similarities, but also some important differences, and several areas of compatibility.”
At a recent “rally”, Harris stated a lot about using “equity” to determine our economy and she included the Communist ideology of making everyone “equal”. Kamala Harris seems to be using her father’s Marxist ideology when it comes to economics but We the People should never allow that because if we do, our nation becomes Communist and like Venezuela, we’ll have lines for food with empty shelves and the government will not allow us to grow our own food. Why? Because under a Communist government, only the government can do that. Kamala Harris will not show her Communist ideology all the way yet, but she does refer to the ideas that she has which are very closely aligned with Communism.
Kamala Harris’s ideas about our economy have been examined and one report below shows what will happen under her ideas.
Study: Harris Economic Agenda Could Add $2T to Deficit
By Michael Katz | Friday, 16 August 2024 07:14 PM EDT
Vice President Kamala Harris is trying to convince voters her economic platform will be cutting costs for Americans, but a study released Friday revealed the Democrat presidential candidate’s plan will increase the nation’s deficit by $1.7 trillion over a decade.
The study by the nonpartisan nonprofit Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget also said the figure would grow to $2 trillion if temporary housing policies were made permanent.
Earlier Friday, Harris revealed the first policy statement of her campaign, now almost a month old. Her “Agenda to Lower Costs for American Families” would, in her first 100 days in office, “cut taxes for the middle class, reduce grocery costs, take on price gouging, lower the costs of owning and renting a home, continue to bring down the costs of prescription drugs, and relieve medical debt for millions of Americans,” according to a fact sheet released by her campaign.
Much of this agenda is regulatory, including the ban on “price gouging” of food and groceries.
The tax-and-spending elements of the agenda include expanding the child tax credit by as much as $6,000 for newborns; extending the enhanced Affordable Care Act subsidies; expanding the earned income tax credit; establishing a first-time homebuyer tax credit of up to $25,000; further supporting affordable housing with tax incentives for building starter homes; an expansion of existing tax credits to support the development of affordable housing, including a $40 billion housing innovation fund; and lowering prescription drug costs.
“Based on our understanding of these policies, we estimate the new tax credits and spending would cost about $1.95 trillion over 10 years from FY [fiscal year] 2026 through 2035, or $2.25 trillion if the housing policies were made permanent,” the study said. “This is partially offset by roughly $250 billion of savings from lower prescription drugs costs — assuming the Harris plan closely matches the Biden-Harris administration’s recent proposals.
“On net, this means the agenda would add $1.7 trillion to deficits as written [before interest]. The Harris campaign has emphasized that the major housing policies would only be in effect for four years. However, if they were extended permanently, the fiscal impact would grow to $2 trillion.”
Although the Harris campaign does not specify how these proposals would be financed, the fact sheet said she and her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, would “fulfill their commitment to fiscal responsibility, including by asking the wealthiest Americans and largest corporations to pay their fair share — steps that will allow us to make necessary investments in the middle class, while also reducing the deficit and strengthening our fiscal health.”
“Importantly, Vice President Harris’ ‘Agenda to Lower Costs for American Families’ represents just one part of her overall campaign agenda,” the study said. “Previously, Vice President Harris has proposed eliminating taxes on tips and raising the minimum wage, which we estimate would cost between $100 and $200 billion over a decade.
“She has also said she will release plans supporting education, child care, and long-term care, among other policies.”
This recent study shows, without a doubt, that Kamala Harris will destroy our nation and our food supply if she is ever elected because of her Marxist/Communist ideas about the economy. We cannot allow that to happen because our nation will fail and food will become so scarce that people will be killed and injured just to try and get food on the table. Harris’ ideas about our economy can be seen in Venezuela. We were, at one time, the breadbasket to the world, but Obama helped end that and now our nation has to depend on others for food that we once supplied to the world. Our freedom should never be directed toward Communism, but under a Harris/Walz regime, our nation will look like Venezuela, Cuba, and many other Communist nations.
We hear Kamala talk about our democracy. Well, our nation was not founded as a democracy. It was founded upon a constitutional Republic.
Look at the vast difference between a democracy and a republic. Let’s also add, our nation thrives under a republic, but loses under a democracy.
Republic or Democracy?
A democracy is a political system which the people periodically by majority vote at the poll select their rulers. The rulers then have absolute power to make whatever laws they please, by the majority among themselves.
In a Constitutional Republic the people also by majority voters at the polls select rulers who make laws by a majority vote among themselves but the rulers cannot make any laws they please because the Constitution severely restricts their law making power.
The ideal of a democracy is universal Equality.
The ideal of a Constitutional Republic is individual liberty.
In this century great strides have been made toward the goal of subverting our Republic and transforming it into a Democracy.
The foremost tactic of the subverters is subversion of language.
By calling America a Democracy until the people thoughtlessly accept and use the term.
Totalitarians have obscured the real meaning of American principles of government.
Writers of the Constitution were anxious to safeguard liberty against dictatorship, monarchy they called it.
But their chief anxiety was to protect the country against Democracy.
Edmond Randolph delegate to the Constitutional Convention from Virginia said the general object of the convention was to provide a cure for the follies and fury of Democracy.
Elbridge Gary and Roger Sherman delegates from Massachusetts in Connecticut urged the Constitutional Convention to create a system to eliminate the evils that flow from the excess of democracy.
Alexander Hamilton delegates from New York said we are now farming a republican government real liberty is not found in democracy if we incline too much democracy we shall soon shoot into a monarchy.
John Adams one of the giants of the American revolutionary period said democracy will envy all contend with all endeavor to pull down all and when by chance it happens to get the upper hand for a short time democracy will be revengeful bloody and cruel.
America was founded not as a democracy but as a Constitutional Republic we pledge allegiance to the Republic for which our flag stands not to a democracy the Constitution requires a republican form of government for all states but does not mention democracy and neither does the Declaration of Independence or the bill of rights.
Foreman asked him what kind of government the convention had given to America and Franklin replied a republic if you can keep it very old and very wise Franklin saw through the mists of time to the day when Americans might trade their freedom in a Constitutional Republic for the promise of government guaranteed Equality and security in a democracy and beyond that to the day when democracy inevitably degenerates into dictatorship guaranteeing nothing but poverty and serfdom for the people it robs and rules.
Below is a quote from George Orwell. However, recently, our president’s press secretary stated nearly the same words.
“The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” -George Orwell, 1984
Our nation is near a very dangerous point, one where we are either free or we become slaves to the Communist rules.
It is our dearest hopes that we all select freedom.
Pass this on so others may know these facts.
