On August 18, I had an article published in “The Washington Standard” and “Sons of Liberty Media” regarding Governor Maura Healey of Massachusetts signing legislation to make it easier for expectant mothers to receive an abortion at end-stage pregnancy. This means abortions past 24 weeks are allowed — with no requirement of medical justification. For further clarification, it means abortions could be performed at full term just days before natural birth — for “any reason or no reason at all.” The governor of Massachusetts signed into law a statute that permits abortion up until the moment of birth. A fully-formed child, moments before exiting the birth canal, can be eviscerated, chopped into pieces, have its head crushed or skin burned off—all under the full protection of Massachusetts law.
As controversial and upsetting as Maura Healey’s legislation is to terminate end-stage pregnancy, there is more that Massachusetts voters should be very concerned about with a primary and election for governor looming — Primary — September 1 and Election — November 3. It’s called the out-of-control drug problem in Massachusetts. Below are links to newspaper articles I have had published regarding Healey’s support of “harm reduction” not “harm elimination” and her alignment with zealots promoting “Church of Safe Injection Sites.” The word “injection” was substituted with “consumption” to entice support from non-profits promoting drug use under the guise of addressing the Massachusetts drug epidemic. What has become troubling is that these harm reduction promoters are not focusing on prevention, education, or treatment, but rather the insanity of giving those addicted safe places to shoot up illegal drugs.
Governor Maura Healey has consistently prioritized harm reduction as a core component of Massachusetts’ response to the opioid and substance use crisis. Healey has aligned herself with non-profit(s) whose focus is support for family members of addicts, distributing Narcan, candlelight vigils, activities for children of addicts for which Healey makes herself visible in attendance. The non-profit(s) are rewarded with seven-figure endowments.
If end-stage abortions, promoting drug use and safe injection sites, as well as being a proponent of gender transition treatments for minors, to the tune of $8.5 million, does not wave a red flag in re-electing Healey, maybe you should consider the following:
Liberal media is reporting, “Republican candidates for governor are still largely unknown to GOP primary voters, and neither fares well against Gov. Healey, according to the results of our new poll.”
If Governor Healey’s track record does not concern voters, here is something for consideration: There are two conservatives running to unseat Healey. They are Mike Minogue and Brian Shortsleeve. Do your homework on them and their positions on crucial issues affecting Massachusetts — and recognize that polls are not supported by concrete.
