The court’s findings indicate that Google is a monopolist in the relevant markets and has unlawfully used its dominant position to sustain its monopoly.
Well, boys and girls, one wonders what will happen next. If you are old enough to remember the break up of the “Bells”, then you know that eventually, they all came back together in one way or another. What will happen to Google now that a district judge has issued this landmark ruling? Personally, I’d love to see Google broken up or completely shut down, and then all the assets sold off in order to provide some sense of restitution for those of us who have been targeted by them, shut out from search engines, and cut off from revenue streams because of their deceitfulness and lies.
Epoch Times reports:
In a landmark legal decision, a federal judge ruled that Google violated antitrust laws by maintaining its monopoly power in the markets for general search services and general search text advertisements.
The ruling, issued on Aug. 5 by District Judge Amit Mehta, concludes a lengthy legal battle initiated by the U.S. Department of Justice and a coalition of state attorneys general.
“After having carefully considered and weighed the witness testimony and evidence, the court reached the following conclusion: Google is a monopolist, and it has acted as one to maintain its monopoly. It has violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act,” Mehta’s decision states.
The case against Google, filed in October 2020, alleged that the tech giant engaged in anti-competitive practices by establishing exclusive agreements with browser developers, mobile device manufacturers, and wireless carriers.
These agreements prohibited partners from pre-installing rival search engines, leading most U.S. devices to come preloaded exclusively with Google, and forcing competitors to find alternative ways to reach users.
In 2021, Google paid more than $26 billion in “revenue share” agreements, based on advertising revenue generated from these default placements.
The court said Google’s conduct allowed the company to charge “supracompetitive prices for general search text ads,” enabling it to earn substantial monopoly profits.
Google argued that its practices were pro-competitive and justified by the quality of its services, although the court found these justifications insufficient.
Google said in a statement to The Epoch Times that “this decision recognizes that Google offers the best search engine, but concludes that we shouldn’t be allowed to make it easily available.
“Given this, and that people are increasingly looking for information in more and more ways, we plan to appeal,” Kent Walker, president of Google Global Affairs, said in the emailed statement. “As this process continues, we will remain focused on making products that people find helpful and easy to use.”
In recent years, antitrust lawsuits have also been filed against other big tech companies Amazon, Meta, and Apple.
The court is expected to impose measures to restore competitive conditions in the affected markets.
