“As long as the narrative is set by them that mean to overthrow this country, this will continue. The problem is that most are listening to the word of the corrupt rather than the Word of the Lord.”
When listening to the rhetoric of those who should know better when it comes to the truths of the matter, namely the said conservatives of the day. What do we get? We get the very leaven of Herod that the Lord warned us of in Mark 8:15.
These said conservatives relay unconstitutional leaven by the propagandists that they profess to denounce (Ephesians 4:14).
Leaven: Anything which makes a general change in the mass. It generally means something which corrupts or depraves that with which it is mixed (Websters 18:28 Dictionary).
In essence, it’s a little truth mixed in with their lies (John 8:44).
For example, these speak much of the debate over abortion, sodomy, illegal immigration, mandatory vaccinations, etc. Yet, this all stands in contrast to whom we are as a people because it stands against the laws of our Republic (Article IV, Section 4, U.S. Constitution). In other words, it is all “null and void,” nugatory!
One outlet even went so far as to share with their readership that executive orders, because the government said so, can now round-up the American people and can put them into FEMA camps. I did not know that the government had the constitutional authority to do such a thing. I can’t seem to find that in the U.S. Constitution and why? Because it is NOT there!
So, in essence, these conservatives of the day (Matthew 5:13) are getting all of their information from those who are leading the opposition in hopes of controlling the very opposition that they are creating (Daniel 9:7).
Friends, first understand that The Declaration of Independence underlies the Constitution. It holds that the rights of the people come from God and that the powers of the government come from the people (Exodus 18:21). This is, in fact, the reason that this government is at war with God and His people (Revelation 12:17).
Second, executive orders are defined:
United States presidents issue executive orders to help officers and agencies of the executive branch manage the operations within the federal government itself. Executive orders have the full force of law (Enumerated laws found within the United States Constitution) when they take authority from a legislative power which grants its power directly to the Executive by the Constitution, or are made pursuant to Acts of Congress (The representatives of the American people) that explicitly delegate to the President some degree of discretionary power (delegated legislation). Like both legislative statutes and regulations promulgated by government agencies, executive orders are subject to judicial review (Not by them that want to interpret what common sense laws state. Nor are judges there to judge the standard by which they are judged by), and may be struck down if deemed by the courts to be unsupported by statute or the Constitution.
There is NO constitutional provision nor statute that explicitly permits executive orders. The term executive power Article II, Section 1, Clause 1 of the Constitution, refers to the title of President as the executive. He is instructed therein by the declaration “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed” made in Article II, Section 3, Clause 5 or face impeachment. Most executive orders use these Constitutional reasonings as the authorization allowing for their issuance to be justified as part of the President’s sworn duties, the intent being to help direct officers of the U.S. Executive carry out their delegated duties as well as the normal operations of the federal government: the consequence of failing to comply possibly being the removal from office.
An executive order of the president must find support in the Constitution, either in a clause granting the president specific power, or by a delegation of power by Congress to the president.
Therefore, if the executive order is not congruent with the United States Constitution, then it is simply “null and void,” period. There is no judicial interpretation, no compromise nor debate. Why? It is because neither this nor any other administration has the power nor the authority to act out of their scope of authority.
“All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” (Marbury vs.Madison, 1803.)
“Every law consistent with the Constitution will have been made in pursuance of the powers granted by it. Every usurpation or law repugnant to it cannot have been made in pursuance of its powers. The latter will be nugatory and void.” (Thomas Jefferson, Elliot, p. 4:187-88.
“…the laws of Congress are restricted to a certain sphere, and when they depart from this sphere, they are no longer supreme or binding. In the same manner, the states have certain independent power, in which their laws are supreme.” (Alexander Hamilton, Elliot, 2:362.)
“This Constitution, as to the powers therein granted, is constantly to be the supreme law of the land.… It is not the supreme law in the exercise of a power not granted.” (William Davie, Pennsylvania, p. 277
“It will not, I presume, have escaped observation that it expressly confines the supremacy to laws made pursuant to the Constitution” (Alexander Hamilton, concerning the supremacy clause The Federalist Papers, #33.)
“There is no position which depends on clearer principles than that every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid.” (Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers, #78.)
Why is this happening?
It tells us in Joshua 22:4-5:
“And now the LORD your God hath given rest unto your brethren, as he promised them: therefore now return ye, and get you unto your tents, and unto the land of your possession, which Moses the servant of the LORD gave you on the other side Jordan.”
But take diligent heed to do the commandment and the law, which Moses the servant of the LORD charged you, to love the LORD your God, and to walk in all his ways, and to keep his commandments, and to cleave unto him, and to serve him with all your heart and with all your soul.”
what does that mean? It means to obey the Lord in your possession as before when you had to fight to obtain that possession (1 Timothy 6:12).
What happens to a people that refuse to keep the Lord’s commandments? The only scriptural response will be judgment upon the heads of the disobedient, period.
“I am the LORD your God, which brought you forth out of the land of Egypt, that ye should not be their bondmen; and I have broken the bands of your yoke, and made you go upright. But if ye will not hearken unto me, and will not do all these commandments; And if ye shall despise my statutes, or if your soul abhor my judgments, so that ye will not do all my commandments, but that ye break my covenant:” -Leviticus 26:14-15 (Read 16-46 concerning the judgments in great specificity).
It also tells us in Deuteronomy 11:28: “And a curse, if ye will not obey the commandments of the LORD your God, but turn aside out of the way which I command you this day, to go after other gods, which ye have not known.”
Yet, what do we see in America today? Eighty-six percent of those that profess to be children of God disobey Him at every given opportunity (1 John 2:6; Isaiah 42:21; Romans 3:31).
It’s time to lawfully deal with the corrupt so our possession remains (Isaiah 26:9).
Become an insider!
Sign up to get breaking alerts from Sons of Liberty Media.