Everyone cheered when President Trump pulled the united States of America out of the Paris Climate Accord, which would have measures implemented to combat the farce of climate change. Many thought the climate change hoax was not coming to the USA. However, while the lamestream government-controlled entertainment enemedia and Congress have citizens’ attention drawn to impeachment, the battle against government over-reach into God-given individual unalienable rights, and the possibility of a pandemic regarding coronavirus, which could be pneumonic plague, the left hand has been busy trying to comply with the hoax of man-made climate change.
The top climate change scientist for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) said he has received $4 million from Congress and permission from his agency to study two emergency—and controversial—methods to cool the Earth if the U.S. and other nations fail to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions.
David Fahey, director of the Chemical Sciences Division of NOAA’s Earth System Research Laboratory, told his staff yesterday that the federal government is ready to examine the science behind “geoengineering”—or what he dubbed a “Plan B” for climate change.
Fahey said he has received backing to explore two approaches.
One is to inject sulfur dioxide or a similar aerosol into the stratosphere to help shade the Earth from more intense sunlight. It is patterned after a natural solution: volcanic eruptions, which have been found to cool the Earth by emitting huge clouds of sulfur dioxide.
The second approach would use an aerosol of sea salt particles to improve the ability of low-lying clouds over the ocean to act as shade.
This technique is borrowed from “ship tracks”—or long clouds left by the passage of ocean freighters that are seen by satellites as reflective pathways. They could be widened by injections of vapor from seawater by specialized ships to create shading effects.
Research in both techniques, Fahey emphasized, are recommended in a forthcoming study by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine titled “Climate Intervention Strategies that Reflect Sunlight to Cool Earth.”
But in a sign of how controversial the topic is, Fahey recommended changing the nomenclature from geoengineering to “climate intervention,” which he described as a “more neutral word.”
Fahey also emphasized this is not an approval to move forward with geoengineering. Rather, it’s to prepare the U.S. government for a political decision if the world fails to adequately limit the rise of global warming. [Emphasis mine.]
Despite the hoax of man-made climate change being exposed in 2009’s “Climategate” and in 2011’a “Climategate 2.0”, government agencies, under the Trump administration, are continuing ahead with measures to “cool” the Earth based on fake, faulty science calling Carbon Dioxide, a gas needed for plants to grow and engage in photosynthesis, a “greenhouse gas”. With all the research that has been done by independent scientists, not government-controlled “yes men” bought and paid for scientists, the role of Carbon Dioxide in “climate change” is nil. So, what is driving this frenzy among governments and government-owned scientists to cling to a hoax and engage in geoengineering or “climate intervention”?
No country lives in a bubble dome. What affects one will affect another when it comes to the Earth’s weather. The goal of these quacks to get to “zero carbon emissions” to combat the climate change hoax is an unrealistic fantasy, based on fake science, and would disrupt the whole of society. But, they know that. It’s all political and a money theft scheme using fear-mongering to create the climate change frenzy in order to get people to part with their money in the largest wealth redistribution scheme in history. And, despite all the information to the contrary, people in the USA still cling to it like a child clings to their baby blanket.
Notice how the talk is to pollute the air with sulfur dioxide – a chemical that no living creation should breathe. Fahey goes on to explain it in the interview with ScienceMag.org.
“Geoengineering is this tangled ball of issues and science is only one of them,” he said.
“One of the things I’m interested in doing is let’s separate the science out,” he added. The idea is to give policymakers a clear view of how a hurry-up bid to save the planet would work.
Even then, the results likely wouldn’t be immediate. Fahey showed slides and graphics that noted that a Plan B might take until the next century to complete the cooling.
Still, better science might “buy time” to improve the efforts, he said.
There would be drawbacks, he noted, after being asked by a researcher whether injections of sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere might reduce seafood by acidifying the oceans.
“When you put aerosols up into the atmosphere, it does a lot of things,” Fahey, a physicist, responded. “That opens up this whole menu of things that you’d have to worry about.”
He said other aerosols such as calcite or titania “might have less impact, but nobody knows. We want to look at them in the laboratory.” [Emphasis mine.]
Nobody knows. That is all that needs to be said to nix this entire geoengineering scheme. Moreover, these “scientists” are working to solve a problem that doesn’t exist. Fear-mongering politicians, those who advocate for communism/socialism, have the low information public believing we only have 10 – 12 years left to act. According to this pseudo-scientist Fahey, the geoengineering scheme would take until the next century. Hmm. Somehow, everyone is coming up with different numbers and timeframes which would lead one to assume what is being done has nothing to do with the hoax of climate change. The climate change hoax narrative is being used to perpetrate an evil on the people who would fiercely object if it were not for fear.
The pseudo-scientist Fahey claimed the “scientific approach” would have to solve “some unknowns” such as what is contained in the stratosphere and unintended consequences. The unknown unintended consequences are enough to nix that in the bud as well as other unknowns. Scientists have gone braindead or sniffed too much low oxygen atmosphere.
But, wait. There’s more.
“We have to use atmospheric observations to find out what we’re doing,” he added.
At the moment, the government has no planned experiments and NOAA’s authority does not extend into the stratosphere. But there is a bill in Congress called the “Climate Intervention Research Act” that would broaden its jurisdiction.
“There could be more than $100 million attached to this, I’m told,” he explained.
Until now, neither Congress nor the administration has ventured to tackle the Plan B issue. The closest thing to testing it is a Harvard University-sponsored project called the “Stratospheric Controlled Perturbation Experiment” (SCoPEx).
It proposes a small-scale test using a propeller-driven balloon. It would ascend to a height of 12 miles over New Mexico and then release less than 2.2 pounds of calcium carbonate.
The idea is to create a tubular area in the sky—about six-tenths of a mile long and 109 yards in diameter—through which the sensor-packed balloon could slowly move back and forth, mixing the air and monitoring the solar-reflecting abilities of the scattered materials. It also would track the impact of the treated area on the surrounding atmosphere.
When SCoPEx would happen remains unknown. [Emphasis mine.]
So, Congress has a bill in the works regarding climate intervention research while other government agencies under the executive branch continue with their restrictions to curb climate change implemented during the Hussein Soetoro administration. All the while the Twitterer-in-chief speaks out against climate change and the brainwashed teen girl parrot. It is well within the constitutional authority of the president to ensure the laws are faithfully executed and to ensure unconstitutional laws are not enforced. Why is good money being followed with bad to conduct these atrocities based on junk, debunked, manipulated, false science?
The article concluded with:
“We’re going to have to give up some things to go into Plan B. That’s why we would be motivated to try designer aerosols, but we may not have time,” Fahey explained.
“That’s what Harvard wants to do. It goes back to the question of which path you want to be on,” he added, noting the difference between a possible international decision to reduce greenhouse gas emissions or being late and forced to implement a Plan B to stop runaway climate change.
“I don’t want to be on the late path, but the question is which paths are going to be open to us,” he said. “I think nobody can play out all the chess moves on this issue. It is so complicated.” [Emphasis mine.]
These statements are enough for people to fiercely reject this nonsense. Fahey never stated what they would have to give up, admitting no one can play out all the steps because it’s so complicated. Well, wouldn’t it be less complicated, steps be known, and a possible outcome theorized if this “science” was meted out using the Scientific Method? Moreover, he even used the fear-mongering tactic nomenclature of “runaway climate change”.
Climate is under the authority of God. Yet, those who reject God believe that man has destroyed the climate, based upon debunked science, and man can fix the climate he destroyed. That’s pretty arrogant. Man is not God and man is certainly not over God. But, we can fix the climate by throwing money away in a wealth redistribution scheme and spray toxic sulfur dioxide in the atmosphere – that’s going to fix the climate. (“sigh… shaking the head”)
What is more incredulous is everyone knows the government lies, the politicians lie, the bankers lie, and the media lies. Yet, let one of those entities say something about the thoroughly debunked fake climate change and suddenly, the low information public buys the rhetoric hook, line and sinker. Unfortunately, their ears are deaf and there is nothing to give the eyes for them to see. When their throat burns, their eyes water, their skin blisters and they hack and whack coughing from the sulfur dioxide in the air, they might believe it then. Or, they might believe it when the government thugs shake them down for every last dime they have in their pocket. Nah, they won’t even believe it then since there will be some other boogeyman hoax to come along and divert their attention – reminiscent of the “cat terrorizer” who follows commands until “Look, squirrel”.
Become an insider!
Sign up to get breaking alerts from Sons of Liberty Media.