Following the release of 20,000 Democratic National Committee emails by Wikileaks, there’s been much ado about the source of the hack. Behind the release is a mysterious figure known only as Guccifer 2.0. It’s been said he is Romanian, but U.S. intelligence officials claim that the technology used to compromise DNC systems included Russian language hacking tools.
The DNC, Clinton campaign and even President Obama are implying that Vladimir Putin is behind the hack and subsequent release of documents. The Kremlin has dismissed the allegations as absurd.
Russia has maintained that their long-standing policy is not to meddle in the elections of other countries. Of course, there are exceptions, and as the following report from Time Magazine suggests, Vladimir Putin has every reason to take down Hillary.
It’s payback time and Putin may well be taking this opportunity to make good on a personal vendetta.
In December 2011, Vladimir Putin came closer than he’s ever been to losing his hold on power. His decision that year to run for a third term as Russia’s President had inspired a massive protest movement against him. Demonstrations calling for him to resign were attracting hundreds of thousands of people across the country. Some of his closest allies had defected to the opposition, causing a split in the Kremlin elites, and Russian state media had begun to warn of a revolution in the making.
At a crisis meeting with his advisers on Dec. 8 of that year, the Russian leader chose to lay the blame on one meddling foreign diplomat: U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
“She set the tone for certain actors inside the country; she gave the signal,” Putin said of Clinton at the time, accusing her of ordering the opposition movement into action like some kind of revolutionary sleeper cell. “They heard this signal and, with the support of the U.S. State Department, started actively doing their work.”
Five years later, the U.S. presidential elections may have given Putin his chance for getting even.
In a normal election year the American people might vehemently reject the intervention of a foreign power in the Presidential election. But given Hillary Clinton’s history as a deceptive politician willing to sell America down the tubes for her own personal benefit, it appears that the American people are not only willing to have a foreign power intervene, they are actively encouraging more leaks.
VIDEO: Trump: “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing…”
Article reposted with permission from SHTF Plan
Become an insider!
Sign up to get breaking alerts from Sons of Liberty Media.
Muslim Man Attacks Indian Teen Girl And Tries To Rape Her At Knifepoint, She Wrestles The Knife Away And Castrates Him Next Post:
Muslims Infiltrate The Government Of Nigeria, Use State Funds To Slaughter Christians
About the Author: Mac Slavo
Trending on The Sons of Liberty Media
UK Nurses Blow Whistle On Crimes Committed In The Name Of COVID (Video)
3,005 Deaths: Media Silent As CDC’s VAERS Acknowledges Deaths Following Experimental COVID Injections Greater In 4 Months Than Previous 13+ Years
Yet Another Medical Expert Speaks Out Against COVID Narrative – Why Are Some Americans Still Not Paying Attention? (Video)
Another Experimental Pfizer COVID Injection Death: 22-Year-Old Israeli Woman Dead Following Her Shot
Chicago: 27-Year-Old Doctor Dead 3 Months After Experimental COVID Injection Raising Long-term Safety Concerns
One Thing That The “Officials” Forgot To Tell You About The Vaccines, The Truth (Video)
Epic Video: Man Parades In Store With Megaphone: “Your Government Is Lying To You” About COVID
Sons Of Liberty Radio LIVE 2-3pm CST
Sons Of Liberty Radio AM Edition LIVE 6-7am EST
Striving For Accuracy
Donate To SonsOfLibertyMedia.com
Support Us Monthly
From the Store
Find Us on Facebook
Join the conversation!
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.