Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Pfizer Admits the Vaccine Was Not Tested Against Virus Transmission: A Review of Covid-19 Propaganda

Written by:

Published on: October 17, 2022

It has been a long time since I have written anything about Covid-19. There had reached a point, after diving into the psychology behind the Covid propaganda, that I had to let it go. I decided I was no longer going to give it any credibility by writing about it. It was something I was not going to let affect my mind the way so many Americans had. To this day, nearly three years after it all started, people are still wearing masks every time the news reports a slight possibility that Covid cases are rising. This is the kind of fear that the so-called social elite tunes into when devising their propaganda campaigns. The type of fear that dominates the mind and makes one susceptible to any dictates that may relieve them of it.

Covid-19 is the perfect example of a media campaign meant to control public perception while setting an agenda that dictates what the public should be thinking about. According to the book Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research, agenda-setting is one of the primary roles of mass media. This came about when media researchers realized that simply reporting facts had little impact on changing the attitudes or opinions of the public. When a story was framed in a different way, however, opinions could be guided to the desired end. Covid-19 was framed in a way to give the perception that it was a world-ending pandemic. All the propaganda surrounding it, along with the business closures, the lockdowns, and the catchy slogans like “social distancing” and “two weeks to slow the curve,” served to cement in the public consciousness the idea that drastic actions needed to be taken to save humanity. The problem is none of it was true. This is something that Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum, admits in his book, Covid-19: The Great Reset. He states that world populations will not be decimated and famines will not be induced. He does, however, ask if it doesn’t provide the opportunity to institute global change. The real agenda behind Covid-19 was providing the means to institute their long-sought-after global government.

The role of the media was to create the perception that by following the recommended, or in most cases, enforced dictates, people could avoid catching the disease. Propaganda campaigns meant to guilt people into wearing facemasks were launched, and unbeknownst to most people, massive studies were taking place to determine how to get people to comply, not only with mask mandates but with the vaccine as well. If every American understood the depth of study that goes into their behavior, and how narratives are contrived to produce compliance, Covid-19 would have never gained a foothold at all.

For example, the book Health Behavior: Theory, Research, and Practice discusses different health behavior research models. One, in particular, The Health Belief Model, is used to influence people’s perceptions and motivate people to take corrective action in the interest of their health. It is based on four constructs of perception, perceived severity, perceived susceptibility, perceived benefits, and perceived barriers. It is easy to see that the media was working diligently to create the perception that Covid-19 posed a severe risk to everyone’s health. They worked in collaboration with the government to create the belief that adopting the interventions would be effective in slowing the spread. Going back to the book Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research, the authors state on page 157, that one of the primary roles of media “is to overcome the psychological barriers which prevent the change of attitudes and opinions” of the masses. In other words, the media was framing their stories in a way to get people to abandon their own sense of reason and give into fear. One study, conducted in 2014, concluded that media blitzes, in collaboration with the government, were effective in pushing a fear message that produced the desired compliance. Another, published in 2021, also based on The Health Belief Model, evaluated people’s willingness to get the vaccine based on their trust in the government and the vaccine manufacturers. They found that people who were unwilling to get the shot cited mistrust of the companies producing the vaccine. Therefore, media messages should be re-framed in a way to show them in a positive light. This is how The Health Belief Model works. Attitudes and perceptions are studied in real-time, and strategies are formulated to change those views. This is similar to Moral Foundations Theory, which I discussed in my last article.

Now I am getting to the point of the article. Ron Paul, in his daily youtube series, The Liberty Report, exposed a story that should infuriate all Americans, whether they support the vaccine or not. Pfizer admitted that there were no human tests conducted to determine if it was effective in preventing transmission of the disease. Here is another source that claims the trials were conducted to see if the vaccine would reduce the severity of one or more symptoms, not transmission, hospitalizations, or even death. Peter Doshi, editor for the BMJ journal, published a study in 2021 which highlighted the ineffective testing procedures employed by Pfizer in determining the efficacy of the vaccine. He writes that many of the studies were conducted on “suspected cases of covid” not confirmed, and because of this, the actual risk reduction factor would have been reduced to nineteen percent. In October 2020, Peter Doshi published the article mentioned in the linked video. In this article, he mentions the fact that studies were limited simply because there were not enough cases of severe illness compared to mild illness for clinical trial purposes. This led to mild symptoms such as a cough or fever being used as an “endpoint definition” of the trials. As I said, people should be infuriated but most are not even paying attention.

Here is where it gets interesting. Donald Trump has and continues to take credit for fast-tracking the vaccine with “operation warp speed.” Even to this day, Trump still promotes the shot despite his most loyal supporters being against it. In December 2020New York Mag Intelligencer reported that the vaccine had been created as early as January of that same year.

“It was completed before China had even acknowledged that the disease could be transmitted from human to human, more than a week before the first confirmed coronavirus case in the United States. By the time the first American death was announced a month later, the vaccine had already been manufactured and shipped to the National Institutes of Health for the beginning of its Phase I clinical trial. This is — as the country and the world are rightly celebrating — the fastest timeline of development in the history of vaccines.” (David Wallace-Wells, New York Mag)

Was operation warp speed just another propaganda campaign meant to get people to accept a vaccine in response to Covid-19? According to Wells, operation warp speed was a way to manufacture the vaccine as the so-called trials were being conducted, while at the same time, getting it approved for emergency authorization use. Vaccines typically take five to ten years for approval yet, the Covid vaccine, we are supposed to believe, was magically fast-tracked and manufactured in less than a year in response to a brand new virus because of the efforts of Donald Trump. Yeah right. Research into the use of mRNA vaccines has been going on for decades. Covid-19 just provided the opportunity for it to be used on the public. What they needed was a charismatic salesman and a media campaign that would create the perception of gloom and doom to sell it off to the masses. In the event that didn’t work, they had another plan that was published in The New England Journal of Medicine in October 2020. The name of their article was “Ensuring uptake of vaccines against Sars-COV-2,” and it detailed the plan put in place by the Biden administration to use the nation’s employers to force the vaccination or lose their job. In November 2020, I wrote this article citing The New England Journal of Medicine in great detail, sending it to my representatives in the hopes that someone would try to stop it.

Today there are numerous reports of people that have been vaccinated suddenly dying from heart conditions like myocarditis. Interestingly, the FDA admitted in their vaccine approval press release that there was a risk of myocarditis in young males and that the long-term health effects of the vaccines were not yet known.

“The observed risk is higher among males under 40 years of age compared to females and older males. The observed risk is highest in males 12 through 17 years of age. Available data from short-term follow-ups suggest that most individuals have had a resolution of symptoms. However, some individuals required intensive care support. Information is not yet available about potential long-term health outcomes. The Comirnaty Prescribing Information includes a warning about these risks.” (FDA.gov)

The reason that no information about long-term health effects is available is that the studies were foregone to get the vaccine to the market. This is something many people knew from the beginning. Now, after millions have been forced to get vaccinated for fear of losing their job, the vaccine manufacturer, who was cited earlier in this article as being a source of mistrust and a reason people would choose not to be vaccinated, admits that they did not do the proper trials. Yet, for some reason, some companies are still enforcing a mandate and people are still wearing masks. What do you do?

Check out my latest book on Critical Race Theory Now available in paperback.  

Also, check out Without a Shot Indeed: Inducing Compliance to Tyranny Through Conditioning and Persuasion.

Become an insider!

Sign up to get breaking alerts from Sons of Liberty Media.

Don't forget to like SonsOfLibertyMedia.com on Facebook and Twitter.
The opinions expressed in each article are the opinions of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect those of SonsOfLibertyMedia.com.

Trending on The Sons of Liberty Media

Newsletter SignupStay up to date on the latest news: Sign up for the Sons of Liberty newsletter!

Stay up to date on the latest news: Sign up for the Sons of Liberty newsletter!