Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.


Playboy Ethics – Puritan Consequences

Written by:

Published on: November 15, 2017

I’m shocked by the bad news about Roy Moore.

I know the man personally from many interviews, and he denies the allegations that he actually committed any crime in the now-numerous allegations that he tried to seduce teenage girls when he was in his early 30s.

And that’s just Roy Moore. Sexual scandals, alleged or otherwise, are rocking our country today.

One only has to name Harvey Weinstein or Kevin Spacey.

Bill O’Reilly went from the No. 1 spot on cable-TV to losing his position over sex-related allegations.

2017 may go down as the year sexual scandals rocked America.

Certainly, if wrongdoing occurred, the guilty should be punished.

The Bible warns, “And you may be sure that your sin will find you out.”

The thing about a charge of rape, said 17th century British judge Sir Matthew Hale, is that it ”is an accusation easily to be made and hard to be proved, and harder to be defended by the party accused” – even if that party is innocent.

It is an excruciating dilemma. Most such crimes occur in private.

And yet false charges are also sometimes made.

How do we give proper due process to the accused while showing compassion to victims?

One thing that troubles me about all this is that Hollywood and the culture do so much to promote an immoral sexual ethic.

Pop music and movies and TV routinely promote sex outside of God-given marital boundaries.

Then when someone engages in these activities, especially if they want to run for office, they are besmirched.

I think what we are seeing in some ways is this: Playboy ethics, but Puritan consequences.

We are constantly bombarded with messages to do whatever feels good.

Then if someone does it, he suddenly faces censure.

Think of the mixed messages we send to young people.

We teach them how to put condoms on cucumbers in schools, but then we frown at teenage illegitimacy.

Yet, the one follows naturally from the other.

Listen to many of the pop songs of our time. They send this message: “If it feels good, baby, do it.”

In one of her songs, for example, Madonna croons, “If it’s against the law, arrest me. If you can handle it, undress me.”

Not to be outdone, Lady Gaga sings, “But I got a reason that you’re who should take me home tonight. I need a man that makes it right when it’s so wrong.”

We routinely see sex outside of marriage on the big screen and the little one.

In 1995, Don Wildmon, of the American Family Association, complained that 88 percent of sexual activity portrayed in prime-time television was between unmarried people – thus, making “lust more attractive than love.”

If it was that bad in 1995, it’s only worse in 2017 – since marriage as a whole continues to suffer significantly in our culture.

Of course, just because we’re bombarded with these messages it doesn’t excuse anybody from giving into his or her base nature or from making unwanted sexual advances.

One of the sacred cows of the Playboy ethic on sex is that anything goes as long as it’s between two consenting adults.

But the “consenting adults” principle still doesn’t halt the consequences of promiscuity, such as a failed marriage, a broken heart, venereal disease, or scandal.

Why do we have the Puritan consequences to certain sexual practices?

I believe our forebears were on to something with their belief that sex was to remain within its God-given strictures: inside the bounds of holy matrimony (of course, between a man and a woman).

When we venture outside of God’s boundaries, we go against the order He designed for our safety and flourishing.

We may mock monogamy all we want, but interestingly, a major study on sex in America in 1992, under the auspices of the University of Chicago, found that the Puritan-type ethic of sex promotes happiness in the bedrooms of its adherents.

They reported, “Once again contradicting the common view of marriage as dull and routine, the people who reported being the most physically pleased and emotionally satisfied were the married couples. … The lowest rates of satisfaction were among men and women who were neither married nor living with someone – the very group thought to be having the hottest sex” (“Sex in America,” p. 124).

The Bible admonishes us to avoid even the appearance of evil. So tell me – why is it that some in our culture were wagging their tongues at Vice President Mike Pence for refusing to go out in public alone with women that weren’t a part of his immediate family?

This culture encourages you to freely let your libido flow – but then when you do, you might end up being punished for it. Playboy ethics, Puritan consequences.

Article posted with permission from Jerry Newcombe

Become an insider!

Sign up to get breaking alerts from Sons of Liberty Media.

Don't forget to like on Facebook, Google+, & Twitter.
The opinions expressed in each article are the opinions of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect those of


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Trending on The Sons of Liberty Media

Newsletter SignupStay up to date on the latest news: Sign up for the Sons of Liberty newsletter!

Stay up to date on the latest news: Sign up for the Sons of Liberty newsletter!