(True Conservative Pundit) In September of 2018, President Trump told The Hill’s John Solomon and Buck Sexton that he would declassify and release all the documents pertaining to the FBI, the DoJ, and the other intelligence agencies that show what these U.S. government entities did wrong in the Russia probe.
It’s been almost a year since Trump declared the “goods” would be released.
No small wonder, for there is an army of Deep State puppets that have been working hard to thwart any attempt to release these documents. Any information that is released, the Democrats and their media allies immediately muddy the waters making the information released look suspect. Pretty good tactic since that information details their own (the Democrats) wrongdoing.
According to John Solomon of The Hill, the Democratic obfuscation and outright obstruction may soon come to a screeching halt:
“But the long wait for transparency may soon end.
The foot-dragging inside the intelligence community (IC) that occurred under now-departed DNI Dan Coats and his deputy, Sue Gordon, could halt abruptly. That’s particularly true if Trump appoints a new IC sheriff, such as former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Pete Hoekstra (R-Mich.), the current ambassador to the Netherlands, or longtime national security expert Fred Fleitz.”
If it is not some Deep State toady inside one of the U.S. intelligence agencies, or a former intelligence operative (such as John Brennan), or one of the many media outlets that lie and cover for the Democrats, it is one of the leading Democrats in Congress or more likely all of the above moving to stop these documents from being released. On top of all that, there is the suppression of conservative voices and investigative journalists by Big Tech such as Twitter and Facebook among others.
Why would the Democrats and their allies work so hard to impede the release of these classified documents (some of which are only classified and/or redacted for the Democrats protection), especially when some of the information related to these documents is already in the public view?
The answer is really pretty simple. If the public only has bits and pieces, it is much easier to do damage control and to spin the information so as to confuse and misdirect. They can even spin the information to make Trump look bad, a definite plus for the Democrats. If the information in these documents is however declassified and released – then all the available information can be tied together and made sense of.
If these documents are released, the Democrats are self-aware enough to realize the very same thing that I realize – that the information contained in these different documents will show America how seriously corrupt the Democrats are (including Obama and his administration) and how deeply complicit the mainstream media has been in attempting to white-wash and cover up what really happened during this whole Russia/Trump collusion investigation.
What did happen during the Trump/Russia investigation? Was it a case of investigating a president for potentially serious wrongdoing as it was purported to be?
Not. A. Chance.
There is plenty of evidence already in the public eye to strongly suggest, if not outright convince any thinking human being – that the only reason for the investigation was as a cover for the Deep State’s nefarious activities.
The objective of all these activities became two-fold:
- First, eliminate the competition (Donald Trump) thereby insuring the presidency of the next Deep State chief executive – Hillary Clinton.
- Second, since the primary objective was not achieved, the goal changed: destroy by any means necessary the sitting president of the United States (who is a serious thorn in the collective Deep State’s side) Donald Trump.
So what are the documents that could spell ruination for the Democrats? Below are the documents John Solomon believes will seriously rock the Democrats:
1.) Christopher Steele’s confidential human source reports at the FBI. These documents, known in bureau parlance as 1023 reports, show exactly what transpired each time Steele and his FBI handlers met in the summer and fall of 2016 to discuss his anti-Trump dossier. The big reveal, my sources say, could be the first evidence that the FBI shared sensitive information with Steele, such as the existence of the classified Crossfire Hurricane operation targeting the Trump campaign. It would be a huge discovery if the FBI fed Trump-Russia intel to Steele in the midst of an election, especially when his ultimate opposition-research client was Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee (DNC). The FBI has released only one or two of these reports under Freedom of Information Act lawsuits and they were 100 percent redacted. The American public deserves better.
2.) The 53 House Intel interviews. House Intelligence interviewed many key players in the Russia probe and asked the DNI to declassify those interviews nearly a year ago, after sending the transcripts for review last November. There are several big reveals, I’m told, including the first evidence that a lawyer tied to the Democratic National Committee had Russia-related contacts at the CIA.
3.) The Stefan Halper documents. It has been widely reported that European-based American academic Stefan Halper and a young assistant, Azra Turk, worked as FBI sources. We know for sure that one or both had contact with targeted Trump aides like Carter Page and George Papadopoulos at the end of the election. My sources tell me there may be other documents showing Halper continued working his way to the top of Trump’s transition and administration, eventually reaching senior advisers like Peter Navarro inside the White House in summer 2017. These documents would show what intelligence agencies worked with Halper, who directed his activity, how much he was paid and how long his contacts with Trump officials were directed by the U.S. government’s Russia probe.
4.) The October 2016 FBI email chain. This is a key document identified by Rep. Nunes and his investigators. My sources say it will show exactly what concerns the FBI knew about and discussed with DOJ about using Steele’s dossier and other evidence to support a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant targeting the Trump campaign in October 2016. If those concerns weren’t shared with FISA judges who approved the warrant, there could be major repercussions.
5.) Page/Papadopoulos exculpatory statements. Another of Nunes’s five buckets, these documents purport to show what the two Trump aides were recorded telling undercover assets or captured in intercepts insisting on their innocence. Papadopoulos told me he told an FBI undercover source in September 2016 that the Trump campaign was not trying to obtain hacked Clinton documents from Russia and considered doing so to be treason. If he made that statement with the FBI monitoring, and it was not disclosed to the FISA court, it could be another case of FBI or DOJ misconduct.
6.) The ‘Gang of Eight’ briefing materials. These were a series of classified briefings and briefing books the FBI and DOJ provided key leaders in Congress in the summer of 2018 that identify shortcomings in the Russia collusion narrative. Of all the documents congressional leaders were shown, this is most frequently cited to me in private as having changed the minds of lawmakers who weren’t initially convinced of FISA abuses or FBI irregularities.
7.) The Steele spreadsheet. I wrote recently that the FBI kept a spreadsheet on the accuracy and reliability of every claim in the Steele dossier. According to my sources, it showed as much as 90 percent of the claims could not be corroborated, were debunked or turned out to be open-source internet rumors. Given Steele’s own effort to leak intel in his dossier to the media before Election Day, the public deserves to see the FBI’s final analysis of his credibility. A document I reviewed recently showed the FBI described Steele’s information as only “minimally corroborated” and the bureau’s confidence in him as “medium.”
8.) The Steele interview. It has been reported, and confirmed, that the DOJ’s inspector general interviewed the former British intelligence operative for as long as 16 hours about his contacts with the FBI while working with Clinton’s opposition research firm, Fusion GPS. It is clear from documents already forced into the public view by lawsuits that Steele admitted in the fall of 2016 that he was desperate to defeat Trump, had a political deadline to make his dirt public, was working for the DNC/Clinton campaign and was leaking to the news media. If he told that to the FBI and it wasn’t disclosed to the FISA court, there could be serious repercussions.
9.) The redacted sections of the third FISA renewal application. This was the last of four FISA warrants targeting the Trump campaign; it was renewed in June 2017 after special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe had started and signed by then-Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. It is the one FISA application that House Republicans have repeatedly asked to be released, and I’m told the big reveal in the currently redacted sections of the application is that it contained both misleading information and evidence of intrusive tactics used by the U.S. government to infiltrate Trump’s orbit.
10.) Records of allies’ assistance. Multiple sources have said a handful of U.S. allies overseas — possibly Great Britain, Australia and Italy — were asked to assist FBI efforts to check on Trump connections to Russia. Members of Congress have searched recently for some key contact documents with British intelligence. My sources say these documents might help explain Attorney General William Barr’s recent comments that “the use of foreign intelligence capabilities and counterintelligence capabilities against an American political campaign, to me, is unprecedented and it’s a serious red line that’s been crossed.”
There is no need for me to reiterate the information contained in the above ten documents discussed. Suffice it to say this: there is plenty of information that is already public to support all of this; this release would merely (but importantly) clarify the truth of the matter.
The truth of the matter is that since Donald Trump the billionaire playboy decided to run for president, and then miraculously (or maybe not so miraculous) won the presidency – the Democrats, the RINO’s, and their willing media partners have engaged in the largest ever conceived soft coup attempt/election interference campaign in the history of the United States. The U.S. government itself was weaponized to destroy a man willing to step up and do the right thing.
The depth of the Left’s depravity and their willingness to destroy anyone who gets in their way is astounding.
It amazes this writer that Trump has accomplished what he has thus far. With the media aligned against him (as much as 95% negative coverage), Big Tech fighting for the other side and suppressing conservatives, and with the fact that the Democrats are out to destroy Trump along with his supporters, and lastly, Trump’s many naysayers – it is almost a miracle that he has been able to achieve so much – not to mention keep going under the relentless pressure.
I hope Trump soon plays the “Trump” card. We the People have been held hostage long enough – it is high time America sees the Clintons, the Obamas, Comey, Brennan, Page, Strzok, and so many others for exactly what they are: evil.
The next step? Vote out the Democrats ensuring they lose power, right along with all the ineffective Republican mouthpieces. Get out and vote, educate yourself, and do not take what the so-called news media tells you at face value.
You have been warned America.
Become an insider!
Sign up to get breaking alerts from Sons of Liberty Media.