“Sex before eight or else it’s too late.” –North American Man Boy Love Association
How many times a day I see people that are posting videos from those who mean to normalize pedophilia with a question mark behind their post asking what people think.
What do I think of this grown man wanting to be with a child sexually, are you kidding me? The problem is that these people are caught in the center of what is right and what is wrong (Deuteronomy 25:1, Luke 17:2).
Let me say it this way, I don’t care what you or any others may think, it is an abomination in the sight of God (Leviticus 18:22, 20:13; 2 Peter 2:6), and sodomy alone is a felony in every state. It’s called “crimes against nature.”
Those who should know the law do not, and that is why the sodomites have come out of the closet in such a brazen and bold way in hopes of getting people to overlook that law in attempts to normalize their crimes (Romans 3:20).
Those who mean to normalize the crime rest in the fact that you do not know the law, which exposes their crimes and that is why they advocate for their crime.
Parents all across the country are taking notice of those who are zeroing in on their children in hopes of making them an open prey. Parents are saying no more and standing up to these criminals for who they are and what they are doing (Psalm 94:16)! Yet, one of the problems that you will notice after watching the video is that they are now looking to the Supreme Court to help them with how the term sex is defined.
Departing from God and His moral law is where the confusion begins.
“So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.” -Genesis 1:27
First off, the presupposition is that God is. Justices put their hands on the Bible, swearing to God and to man that they will uphold His laws (1 John 5:2).
Friends, it is not for the Supreme Court Justices to redefine or reinterpret that which God has established.
William Blackstone stated, “No enactment of man can be considered law unless it conforms to the law of God.”
America needs to come to terms and understand that no president, no administration, no Supreme Court, has the right to break God’s law.
Secondly, it is the job of Supreme Court, as well as the inferior courts, to merely discover and apply written law, nothing more, and nothing less.
If they act outside of their scope of authority, it is considered bad behavior and they are to be removed (Article 3, Sections 1, 2 & 4, US Constitution).
What happens when you put a confused and abominable individual in the position of a Supreme Court justice? Furthermore, one who has never judged a case a day in her life.
Elena Kagan is the former dean of students at Harvard. Contrary to Harvard’s founding mottos, “For Christ and the Church” and “For the glory of Christ,” Kagan is known for “Queerifying Harvard.”
During her tenure, she did the following:
Kagan hired former ACLU lawyer William Rubenstein to teach “queer” legal theory, in which he taught courses on taking up new identities such as bisexuality, transgender f**k, involving polygamy, sadomasochism, and the sexuality of minors.
Kagan also hired other radicals (a lesbian and a transsexual) to teach transgender law courses, as well as Cass Sunstein who has written in support of polygamy and free-for-all marriage relationships.
Kagan viciously attacked our military in opposition to “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” even banning military recruiters from coming on campus. Kagan’s attempt to ban the recruiters was unsuccessful, and even after losing her legal campaign, she encouraged students to continue protesting them.
Kagan’s radical activism on campus was so toxic that there was even a campaign to make the entire university trans-inclusive, using Harvard’s “gender identity” non-discrimination policy to spew gender confusion among students on campus.
Elena Kagan has never judged a case a day in her life, yet Obama, unqualified for office himself, has seen fit to “qualify” her on the Supreme Court bench…just in time for the Court to review homosexual marriage.
Obama’s Solicitor General Donald Verrilli argued that the DOMA (Defense of Marriage Act) is unconstitutional because it violates “the fundamental guarantee of equal protection.” The phrase “equal protection” comes from the Fourteenth Amendment. Verrili conveniently omitted that equal protection is “of the laws.”
The question is, whose law? The laws of our republic, which are derived from God.
As Thaddeus Stevens said in his debate on the floor over the 14th Amendment, “No distinction would be tolerated in this purified republic but what arose from merit and conduct.”
Become an insider!
Sign up to get breaking alerts from Sons of Liberty Media.