These numbers are not natural.
The New York Times has a shallow cheerleading article about where Zohram Mamdani’s votes came from. As I already pointed out, Mamdani benefited from low turnout below 30% and won the vote of some 5% of New Yorkers.
But the Times has some interesting figures in this chart.
Mr. Mamdani’s campaign had focused on registering voters, and he also appears to have drawn thousands of voters to the primary who did not vote four years ago.
Those are pretty incredible numbers. 40,000 voters would make up nearly 10% of Mamdani’s totals. Who are these new voters?
“A review by The Times of the likely ethnic makeup of the electorate found that voters with names associated with majority Muslim countries were far more likely to vote in 2025 than in 2021.”
Not much more than that except that the age makeup is naturally impossible.
The New York Times drops this impossible chart and then has nothing to say about it. Age makeup like this doesn’t exist in elections. Yet we’re supposed to believe that 18-25 year olds voted at higher rates than any other age group in this primary. That doesn’t happen.
Who were these 18-25 year olds? The Muslim settler population in the US is uniquely young so that “roughly a third of all Muslim adults are under the age of 30”. That may offer a partial explanation for what we’re seeing here. Social media trends wouldn’t do this. Organized community bloc voting would. Beyond fraud and numbers like these absolutely raise that question, we are seeing a test of the system that Islamists used to swamp elections in the UK. We may want to wake up before it starts happening on a large scale here.
Article posted with permission from Daniel Greenfield
