Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Tomato Or Tomahto: What’s The Difference Between Quarantine & Isolation?

Written by:

Published on: November 9, 2020

Tomato or tomahto, potato or potahto; what’s the difference? It’s all in the pronunciation. No matter how you pronounce it, a potato is a root vegetable and a tomato is the edible fruit from the plant, Solanum lycopersicum, also known as a “tomato plant”. What does this have to do with anything occurring today you might ask? Plenty. It involves “quarantine” and “isolation”.

According to the US Department of Health and Human Services, “isolation separates sick people with a contagious disease from people who are not sick” while “quarantine separates and restricts the movement of people who were exposed to a contagious disease to see if they become sick.” In the latter scenario, people designated for “quarantine” may have been exposed to a contagious disease and do not know it, or these people may have the disease but show no symptoms. Of particular note, it wasn’t until the SARS outbreak in 2003 that “severe acute respiratory syndromes” were added to the quarantine list by executive order 13295. Yet, despite the 2003 SARS outbreak, the Center for Disease Control “did not compel isolation or quarantine for SARS.” In fact, the last litigated case for involuntary quarantine occurred in 1963 of a suspected smallpox passenger arriving in the united States. When it came to SARS, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) stated, “In the absence of fever or respiratory symptoms, household contacts need not limit their activities outside the home, unless otherwise required by quarantine regulations.” What other quarantine regulations required activity limitation was not mentioned. It could mean local or State regulations. But, the CDC statements indicated that asymptomatic individuals need not quarantine.

So, the previous SARS outbreak was not enough to implement quarantine and isolation and neither was the 2009 “swine flu” fake pandemic. Yet, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared on March 11, 2020, that COVID-19 was a pandemic after 114 countries reported a total of 118,000 cases and 4,300 deaths. Remember, cases do not equate to disease or illness. And, it has been proven that the vast majority of individuals have mild symptoms – so mild these individuals would not even know it was COVID-19. It has also been proven that the CDC issued guidelines for reporting COVID-19 deaths that included deaths from motor vehicle accidents as well as other conditions whether or not the individual had the illness.

Moreover, the WHO declared a pandemic without any isolation of the microorganism, which still has not been isolated to this day, and without any scientific proof that what is claimed to be “parts of the microorganism” causes this COVID-19 – giving rise to the designation CON-VID-19. Don’t forget where this all originated and the WHO taking that country’s government word on everything along with the skewing of information by the WHO and CDC. And, tests for COVID-19 are still highly false positive. So it was, the knee-jerk reaction began.

Trending: GEORGIA: One Batch of 23,000 Fraudulent Ballots All For Biden – More Than Enough To Overturn State

Eight days after the WHO declared the COVID-19 a “pandemic”, it issued “Considerations for quarantine of individuals in the context of containment for coronavirus disease (COVID-19).” But, as early as February 29, 2020, the WHO issued its first interim guidance. In both these documents, the WHO recommended “quarantine facilities” to include hotels, dormitories, other facilities that could cater to groups or the home of the individual.

According to this document, “Regardless of the setting, an assessment must ensure that the appropriate conditions for safe and effective quarantine are being met.” It included guidance for home quarantines. What we now know is these “interim guidance” documents prepared by the WHO outline measures that are largely ineffective. How do we know that? Without a definitive isolated microorganism, no one really knows what is making individuals ill. The hypothesis is a “respiratory virus”; therefore, the method of transmission is hypothesized based on other “respiratory viruses”. But, this assumes germ theory is not a theory. The measures to combat spread are based on these guesses.

The WHO even warned, “if not implemented properly, quarantine may also create additional sources of contamination and dissemination of the disease.”

As a result of the WHO’s “interim guidance”, Australia, particularly Victoria, implemented quarantine measures for returning travelers at hotels designated as “quarantine facilities”. To understand the impact, watch this report from Sky News Australia, “Deadly Decisions: Victoria’s Hotel Quarantine Catastrophe”.

If anything, what happened in Victoria, Australia, is a contraindication for the quarantining of individuals who have zero symptoms and a presumption of exposure, not known exposure, and housing ill individuals with non-ill individuals in a hotel. Moreover, ill individuals were allowed to come and go freely at the hotel in Victoria, when those ill individuals should have been in isolation.

Ask yourself this, if quarantine was the way to go, why were some prisoners set free? You can’t get more quarantined than prison. The rationale was close quarters spread the virus. So, quarantining doesn’t work. Oh wait, the logic was quarantining works everywhere except prison.

Yet, the WHO issued a new “interim guidance” on August 19, 2020, advocating the same measures with an expansion for quarantining and isolating children. As we know, the infection mortality rate for children might as well be zero. Remember, the CDC updated its own website to indicate that only 6% of all US deaths were from COVID-19 alone and those deaths were among the elderly and those with more than one co-morbidity. In assessing the survival rate of this “COVID-19”, it is not nearly as morbid as the world was led to believe, according to the CDC infection fatality ratios. The latest data is indicated in Scenario 5 in the table. To convert infection fatality ratios to infection fatality rates, move the decimal two places to the right. Therefore, in the age group 0-19, the infection fatality rate is 0.003%. As you can see, the highest infection fatality rates are among those aged 70 and greater at 5.4%.

Despite all of the information garnered since this outbreak of unidentifiable illness, governments across the world, including the various States in the united States, are continuing to operate as if dealing with a global killer.

Now, getting back to quarantine and isolation, it can be deduced that the simple solution was to quarantine the most vulnerable population – the elderly, those with multiple mordibities, and the immunocompromised, while isolating those who are ill early on until more information could be gathered and scientists learned about the so-called virus. This is how things have usually been carried out in the face of respiratory illnesses, such as the flu. Because of the unreliability of the tests, which were never meant for diagnostic purposes, it was unreasonable to quarantine healthy individuals with healthy immune systems. And, it was definitely unreasonable to continue to operate on old data, as many governments have. It’s more than unreasonable – it is downright criminal. Moreover, it is worse than irresponsible of the lamestream government-controlled propaganda entertainment enemedia to continue to report outdated information to the public. Medical professionals who also continue to do this are guilty of malfeasance and malpractice.

In short, there is still no microorganism isolation or proof this illness is what is being labeled as COVID-19. Despite proof of adequate treatments in the form of Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, the push is on for a vaccine for an unidentified, non-isolated microorganism with a very high survival rate among the general population. Unfortunately, some in the medical community suffering from a “god complex” are willing to inflict harm upon the population in the form of quarantines that go against common sense and logic and promote an experimental form of vaccine or other vaccine – none proven safe or effective.

It took the discovery of the atrocities perpetrated by the Nazi Germany regime to coin a new term, crimes against humanity. With what is trying to be implemented against the world’s population – an experimental vaccine against an unidentified microorganism that could alter DNA, what new term will need to be coined to describe this global crime being contrived against the world’s population by the various nations’ governments at the behest of the urgings of a few elites?

Become an insider!

Sign up to get breaking alerts from Sons of Liberty Media.

Don't forget to like SonsOfLibertyMedia.com on Facebook, Google+, & Twitter.
The opinions expressed in each article are the opinions of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect those of SonsOfLibertyMedia.com.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Trending on The Sons of Liberty Media

Send this to a friend