“You can fool some of the people all of the time; but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time (And God at no time).’ –Abraham Lincoln
Recently, my wife had a conversation with someone who had said that they had not given on Trump just yet. Keep in mind that they said this, all the while knowing how many lies the president has told his supporters. Well, friends, I am here to tell you that by the fruit that this administration has borne that Trump has given up on you long ago (Matthew 7:16). And no matter how many times you tell people the truth of the matter, they hold to the man and reject the Word of God (Isaiah 30).
Donald Trump professes to be a Christian while promoting what God condemns! Friends, that is a lack of Christianity.
“He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him.” -1 John 2:4
If there was one topic in revealing one’s self, it is just this topic. The Lord does not call sodomy a sin (1 John 3:4), He calls it an abomination!
Abomination is defined in Websters 1828 Dictionary as:
1. Extreme hatred; detestation.
2. The object of detestation, a common signification in scripture.
The way of the wicked is an abomination to the Lord. Proverbs 15:8.
3. Hence, defilement, pollution, in a physical sense, or evil doctrines and practices, which are moral defilements, idols and idolatry, are called abominations.
“You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.” -Leviticus 18:22
This last charade coming from this administration…
Lifesitenews: Trump accepts sweeping pro-transgender SCOTUS decision, calls it ‘very powerful.’ The ruling could force churches to recognize same-sex ‘marriages’ and open restrooms and changing rooms to gender-confused individuals.
WASHINGTON, D.C., June 15, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – President Donald Trump suggested Monday that the administration would not be moving to challenge or mitigate the Supreme Court’s 6-3 ruling writing “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” into a longstanding law meant to prohibit discrimination on the basis of biological sex.
Justice Neil Gorsuch, Trump’s first addition to the nation’s highest court, wrote the majority opinion for the ruling, which concluded that “sex disicrimination” in Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act should be interpreted to mean sexual orientation and gender identity, in addition to its original biological meaning.
“An employer who fires an individual for being homosexual or transgender fires that person for traits or actions it would not have questioned in members of a different sex,” Gorsuch wrote. “Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what Title VII forbids.”
“I’ve read the decision, and some people were surprised,” the president told reporters at the White House this afternoon, The Hill reported. “But they’ve ruled and we live with their decision. That’s what it’s all about. We live with the decision of the Supreme Court. Very powerful. Very powerful decision actually. But they have so ruled.”
Trump’s reaction did not discuss any of the details of the ruling, and did not address the fact that his own administration weighed in against the position Gorsuch ultimately chose, by filing an amicus brief that argued that Title VII “simply does not speak to discrimination because of an individual’s gender identity or a disconnect between an individual’s gender identity and the individual’s sex.”
The majority’s reasoning flies in the face of both the plain statutory meaning of “sex” in 1964 and the clear legislative intent of the lawmakers who drafted and passed the Civil Rights Act, as explained by Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) senior counsel John Bursch. “There is little dispute that, in 1964, the term ‘sex’ was publicly understood, as it is now, to mean biological sex: male and female,” he wrote. “After all, the term ‘gender identity’ wasn’t even part of the American lexicon at the time. Its first use was at a European medical conference in 1963. And no semblance of it appeared in federal law until 1990.”
But Gorsuch’s opinion panned the notion of authorial intent, a bedrock principle of judicial originalism, by declaring that judges “are not free to overlook plain statutory commands on the strength of nothing more than suppositions about intentions or guesswork about expectations. In Title VII, Congress adopted broad language making it illegal for an employer to rely on an employee’s sex when deciding to fire that employee.”
Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented, panning the majority opinion as “legislation” written under the “deceptive” guise of “interpreting a statute,” reminding the majority that the court’s duty “is limited to saying what the law is” rather than adding to it.
Before wanting to defend the President of the United States, do consider what it is that most profess to be that support his administration. They profess to be Christians who defend the un-defensible by putting the word of corrupt man over that of a holy and just God (1 Peter 1:15-17). They have it backward just like the ones that they mean to justify. The agenda continues to go forward, and that to their own demise.
Become an insider!
Sign up to get breaking alerts from Sons of Liberty Media.