Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.
In this revolution, research has become central, it also becomes more formalized complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.
Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.
The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present — and is gravely to be regarded.
Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite. – Dwight D. Eisenhower, Farewell Address, January 17, 1961. [Emphasis Mine.]
This warning by former President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1961 reads, now, like a prediction he deduced from what he saw while in the White House. What we see today in the handling of CON-VID-19 science is in the hands of government controlled scientific-technological elites. Moreover, health professionals have become “idolators” of agencies, such as the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO), to the point these individuals discount, disparage, and deny the actual science and research done by those in the medical field who have zero government ties. These independent researchers are more interested in the health of the public than the idolators and government agencies.
As proof of these statements, several articles at The Sons of Liberty Media and information from The Sons of Liberty Radio Shows outline what has happened to physicians and others who have dared to speak out against the “official narrative” and measures to stem CON-VID-19, not only in the united States but abroad as well. Moreover, the CDC has been exposed for publishing fraudulent data, but individuals like Fauci, Birx, and head of the CDC, Robert Redfield, continue to use old, fraudulent data when in front of the media cameras to keep Americans under the thumb of government and the scientific-technological elites.
Here is new information that has surfaced proving the scientific-technological elites have hijacked medical science to exact an agenda using the hoax of CON-VID-19 as the catalyst.
Blacklisted News reported on a story out of RT.com that indicated Microsoft’s Bill Gates urged the united States to “deputize” trust community leaders to “reduce vaccine hesitancy” in order to prepare for the CONVID-19 vaccine rollout. The model Gates proposes looks similar to what was used in Nigeria to “coerce” individuals to receive the polio vaccine, which has now resulted in a “vaccine induced” polio epidemic in Africa. In Nigeria, religious leaders were tapped to speak to the people to gain trust while vaccinating these leaders’ own children. He claims that understanding the trust network is key – “who is it that you view as an expert”. Because very few people will look at the data or formula directly, this is the best method to quell “conspiracy theories”.
Gates does not have a college degree and definitely is not a medical doctor. Yet, we see Gates “recommending” vaccines, vouching for their safety while indicating the world’s population could be reduced by 10 – 15% if a “good job” is done with vaccines. Moreover, Gates is funding six leading CON-VID-19 vaccine candidates. And why wouldn’t he when he stands to make a whopping $200 billion dollars on a $10 billion dollar investment, as long as HIS vaccine gets to market and vaccines are mandated?
Michael Thau, writing for JamesFetzer.org, reports on an article by the New York Times indicating that up to 90% of those who have tested positive for CON-VID-19 using the RT-PCR test were wrongly diagnosed; but, the truth is much worse. The unreliability of the RT-PCR test has been exposed ad nauseum repeatedly. Yet, it is still used as the benchmark for diagnosis and is promoted for this use by the CDC. Thau explains in detail the use of the RT-PCR and the varying cycles being used by labs, each lab runs different cycles ranging from 33 – 40, to obtain results. Here is the important part:
Their article informs us that most testing companies run the samples they receive through 40 cycles. As we saw above, that means any genetic material in them is being multiplied over a trillion times. We’re told that a few companies run samples through only 37 cycles, which is still multiplying the amount of converted viral-RNA by a factor of almost 140 billion.
The New York Times goes on to say that the “C.D.C.’s own calculations suggest that it is extremely difficult to detect any live virus in a sample above a threshold of 33 cycles.” But, this is a deceptive way of stating what the CDC’s data shows that significantly understates how using 40 or even 37 cycles is going to result in massive amounts of positive diagnoses that ought to be negative.
The CDC didn’t just have “extreme difficulty” finding any live virus in samples whose cycle threshold was above 33. They were straight-up unable to find any. Moreover, they were frequently unable to find any live virus even in samples with lower cycle thresholds.
But the worst is yet to come.
Though the CDC replied to the Times by saying they were “examining the use of cycle threshold measures for policy decisions,” the New York Times either didn’t know or didn’t want you to know that the CDC already has guidelines that recommend … wait for it… 40 amplification cycles. Even though their own researchers were unable to find any live virus in samples with a cycling threshold greater than 33!
That’s right folks. The CDC issued guidelines for COVID-19 testing that their own research shows are bound to mean that a lot of people not infected by the virus would get back test results falsely saying they were.
Moreover, even running samples through the 33 cycles the New York Times mentions as the cutoff point in the CDC’s research appears to be way too much amplification.
One paper the CDC cites reports finding no “live” virus in any samples whose cycle threshold is greater than 24. And, even the CDC found a lot more samples that had no live virus than they did samples that did for cycle thresholds between 24 and 33.
Remember, the RT-PCR was not developed for diagnostic purposes and cannot tell the difference between coronaviruses – cold, flu, CON-VID-19. Moreover, what are these tests finding when a microorganism has not been isolated or identified that causes CON-VID-19? We know that what is being called CON-VID-19 is actually human genome 8: primary assembly. In short, the RT-PCR is utterly useless or meaningful in determining anything, much less the presence of a non-identified microorganism. Is it any wonder why it is termed “CON”-VID-19?
Despite Fauci being “out” as the “infectious disease expert” because of the exposure of his lies and pandering, the lamestream government-controlled propaganda entertainment enemedia (LGCPEE) continues to put his lying mug in front of cameras to spout his recommendations based on scientific malpractice. The new expert is Dr. Scott Atlas, appointed by Trump to be an advisor. Dr. Atlas has been an outspoken adversary of “house arrests” and isolating healthy populations.
“This lockdown is what I would call a luxury of the rich. This is really a class problem here where the affluent elites don’t understand, that what the president understands, which is that people need to work. The working class need their jobs, children need to go to school, and it’s very harmful to do otherwise.”
Host Laura Ingraham pointed out that the places that are open—which are doing better economically and mentally—are all Republican states. “There is a complete fallacy that President Trump is not following the science,” continued Atlas. “These people actually agree very much with [Trump’s] strategy: protect the vulnerable as much as we can and open up because of the harms of that.”
…
Ingraham showed the numbers for flu versus COVID for school-aged children that demonstrate it is less deadly than the flu. Atlas concurred, saying, “this is not really arguable…it’s scientifically factual.”
So, why is Fauci, who recommends another round of “house arrests” for a non-existent “second wave”, not fired, removed, ousted, and shamed for his continual pandering false data and information? Moreover, why is Fauci not being held criminally accountable for the damage that he has caused countless numbers of Americans? The same question can be asked of entities like the CDC, the WHO, and public health departments, along with the directors of these entities.
Mises Institute has an article posted that indicates CON-VID-19 has produced an escalation in medical tyranny. It contends there is inherent danger of handing healthcare over to the State.
Already we have seen agents of the state, at various levels, seek to leverage a viral medical crisis to expand their power. Governors and local officials have sought to use vague “emergency” powers to lock down businesses and to create criminal penalties, and have then attacked any attempts by judiciaries to rein in their actions. Judges have sought to leverage the power they hold in deciding child custody to force citizens to make medical decisions they disagree with. Anointed government experts, such as Dr. Anthony Fauci, in spite of his own inconsistencies, have been held up as the final word on science, at the expense of the voices of other credible scientists.
Whether by design or by the instinctual reaction, we have seen a the concerted effort of government authorities—amplified by a corporate press with a particularly vivid political agenda, and supported by the credentials of an academic landscape that suffers from ideological capture—to weaponize a centralized scientific narrative for the purpose of achieving certain policy ends. It is appropriate that some have dubbed this union “the Cathedral,” as we have seen the divine right of kings renewed in the divine right of approved scientists.
None of this should be a surprise. Ludwig von Mises, F.A. Hayek, Murray N. Rothbard, and others have long warned of the dangers of “scientism.” As Jonathan Newman has noted on this site, we’ve seen it play out increasingly in American pop culture with the fetishizing of figures like Neil deGrasse Tyson and Bill Nye.
Now, luckily, the current healthcare system has limits on the degree to which we, as individuals, must submit to the power of the “scientific consensus.” How long, however, will that doctor-patient relationship remain sacred?
This is what has been postulated for quite some time – damage of the doctor-patient relationship to the point one cannot trust one’s own physician. Discredited, unethical individuals are being upheld as the “final word” on the science while credible scientists who are using factual up-to-date data are being silenced. It’s a travesty that can only be labeled as “political manipulation of science to fit an agenda”. You can bet the day is close at hand when personal physicians will bow to the “politicized science”, if they haven’t already, that will ultimately inflict harm upon their patients. If that happens, those physicians should be held accountable under medical malpractice.
But, government is not the only culprit in continuing to use false, manipulated data to enforce individuals to comply with unproven measures to combat a “flu”. Compliance is being “forced” by non-governmental entities such as private businesses.
HumansAreFree.com reports on an article that appears at The Daily Mail indicating that United Airlines and Cathay Pacific in the United Kingdom are testing an app dubbed “CommonPass” that will allow individuals to travel the globe without fear of quarantines.
Coronavirus passport trials are taking place at Heathrow this week to test technology to let people travel the globe without risk of being quarantined.
Passengers on United Airlines and Cathay Pacific are trying out an app called the CommonPass.
The phone software is a digital health pass which can hold a certified COVID-19 test status or show someone has been vaccinated in future in a way designed to satisfy various governments’ different regulations.
It has been launched by non-profit trust Commons Project Foundation, part of the World Economic Forum, in the hope of it will end the days of flyers producing bits of paper, often in different languages.
The tech is very much at the trial stage using volunteers on flights between London, New York, Hong Kong and Singapore under government observation.
But it is seen as a longer-term measure to allow air travel to return to something like pre-coronavirus levels.
However, it is reliant on Governments around the world accepting test results from ‘certified’ laboratories in other countries and allowing those with negative results to enter freely on their say-so.
Dr Bradley Perkins, chief medical officer of The Commons Project, said: ‘Without the ability to trust COVID-19 tests – and eventually vaccine records – across international borders, many countries will feel compelled to retain full travel bans and mandatory quarantines for as long as the pandemic persists.
‘With trusted individual health data, countries can implement more nuanced health screening requirements for entry.’
According to Patrick Wood, editor at Technocracy News and Trends, “The sheer mental disconnect of this program will require a traveler to be tested again and again, for sickness could strike at any time after a successful test. If a test is negative, then you are grounded wherever you happen to be at the time.”
If you don’t submit to a CON-VID-19 test and “pass”, don’t look to travel anywhere on an airline carrier should this atrocity take hold. In the united States, current HIPAA laws protect the health information of individuals being reported or shared with those who have no need for health care information and requires the individual to give permission for health care information to be shared. If this “commonpass” gets implemented for air travel, airline carriers and foreign government entities may have access to your health information. And, don’t be naïve to think this will just apply to CON-VID-19 either.
A new paper by researchers at Edinburgh University suggests that lockdowns do not help to reduce the death toll from Covid-19, but may simply postpone those deaths. It’s another piece of evidence that suggests that a different strategy to combat the pandemic – one that doesn’t impose blanket restrictions across society – is needed.
The research was done by a team from Edinburgh’s School of Physics and Astronomy. If that sounds odd, Professor Graeme Ackland, one of the authors, has a good explanation. He told me: “From March, every serious epidemiologist has been seconded to SPI-M (the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Modelling) and SAGE (the main Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies), producing new research on a timescale of days. There simply aren’t enough of them to also do replication or even careful peer review. But there were thousands of people who could do data-cleaning, code checking, validation and replication.”
World ruler, Bill Gates, says lockdown will continue until end of 2021 and everyone must be vaccinated.
Ackland and his colleagues were, he says, “tasked by SPI-M and SAGE with exploring any ‘reservations’. SPI-M understood very well the problem of groupthink in a closed community, and asked us to ‘kick the tyres’ on everything. Another thing real epidemiologists would do themselves given enough time.”
Their paper is not really a criticism of the original modelling done before lockdown. In fact, it uses the model used by Imperial College to assess a wider range of scenarios than was done at the time. “My overall opinion”, says Ackland, “is that the government’s experts have reliably produced better predictions than the ‘newspaper experts’.”
One sentence in the new paper is particularly striking in regards to the original Imperial College work: “Contrary to popular perception, the lockdown, which was then implemented, was not specifically modelled in this work.” Given that lockdown carried on for months, and schools remained shut until the autumn, the failure to go back to see what the model says about the effects of lockdown is remarkable.
It has already been proven the Imperial College model “predictions” were way off base; yet, government and LGCPEE appointed “expert” Fauci continues to be the face of CON-VID-19 countermeasures recommendations based on faulty models, false data and manipulated data.
All of this information indicates the scientific-technological elite are exacting control through their slight of hand, fantastical data. What Eisenhower warned the American public about is now coming to pass. These “elitists” are sitting in an echo chamber, bouncing ideas off one another while ignoring actual scientific data gathered by independent scientists. As it stands right now, these scientific-technological elite, coupled with the “power hungry” in government, are the biggest threat to individual freedom and liberty facing the US and other nations as well. Keep watching the “narrative” increase for “house arrests” amid a non-existent “second wave” as you contemplate what Eisenhower warned concerning the scientific-technological elite. These elite are driving the narrative and directing government responses to that narrative. The remedy is to push back with civil disobedience and demand those who are doing harm be held accountable according to the law.
