Electronic Tattoos: If You Need One To Access The Internet, Can It Not Also Be Used To Access The Host?

Forget smartphones, biometric data, or other forms of surveillance.  Jumping back to the Holocaust concept of applying a tattoo to prisoners at Auschwitz, today’s demonic technocrats are actively reviving that barbaric practice.

Apparently, it is becoming too cumbersome to install cameras all over the place, it isn’t guaranteed that everyone will own a smartphone, and plastic cards can be damaged or lost.  A new form of surveillance and practical use system was needed.  Something embedded right in the host itself that can never be lost.  Rather than a chip, an electronic tattoo is far more reasonable.  A dream from nine years ago is now becoming a reality.

The concept of electronic tattoos includes a “subset of electronic skin that is designed to be worn directly on the skin, conforming to the body’s contours and movements.”  Or it could be a “wearable device with integrated sensors that attaches to the wearer’s skin and transmits data wirelessly.”  Perhaps made to look like a tattoo, “receptors and microchips” for monitoring are used in place of ink.  Exploration in this new technology has been in development for some time.

However, now the innovations have proceeded to just invading the body.

Naturally, Bill Gates has a finger in this new idea.  Embedded into the body with smart ink, these tattoos are powered by nanotechnology, which gives access to the internet through interaction with devices.  Or, let’s just create a way to place other substances like a graphene biosensor on the body.  The Fourth Industrial Revolution goal has always been to fuse the digital, biological and physical worlds together.

What better way to accomplish all-inclusive human connectivity to the internet, providing abundant surveillance, than with an object physically embedded in the body.

Those in the tattoo business are well aware of this new technology.  Right now, the focus is on sensors that will transmit health data, but some believe these tattoos will progress further by helping mobilize those who are bedridden or be a benefit in other health conditions.  However, “electronic tattoos could serve as a non-invasive interface for controlling smart devices, such as smartphones, wearable tech, or prosthetics. The tattoos could communicate through touch or gesture recognition.”  Research into what can be done with tattoo technology is ongoing.

The question that comes to mind is, if the tattoo on the body can control access to the internet or other technology, would it be possible to reverse that and have that technology do the same to the tattoo host?  One just has to imagine what the potential danger is in this technology. There doesn’t seem to be any end to the technocrat dream of control over humanity.