While Biden licks their boots. This didn’t happen under the Trump Administration. The CCP officials continue to abuse and dominate the Biden Administration’s foreign policy team. It’s an absolute horror to watch. Pray for America and the free world.
Why talk to a regime that does not want to talk to us? See: https://t.co/8IRNUfLBxm. #China #CCP @GatestoneInst
— Gordon G. Chang (@GordonGChang) July 30, 2021
China Ambushes Top American Diplomat
By Gatestone Institute, July 30, 2021
“Chinese leaders give the impression that the U.S.A. has much more to seek from them than they from Washington…. This time, the Americans were on the defensive as they sought Beijing’s cooperation on a range of issues—climate change, North Korea, Iran, Afghanistan, and others—ensuring that the U.S.A. did not seek conflict.” — Yogesh Gupta, former Indian diplomat and specialist on China-India relations, Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post, July 27, 2021.
In fact, the Chinese are not that essential, and American leaders do not have to listen to them. Take their economy. Last year, China became even more dependent on exports, and it remains extraordinarily reliant on access to the U.S. market. In 2020, China’s merchandise trade surplus with the U.S. accounted for a stunning 58.0% of its overall merchandise trade surplus.
Moreover, China’s financial markets have become even more dependent on foreign capital because of Xi Jinping’s unrelenting attack on his country’s tech sector. Xi began his most recent phase of this months-long assault with the unprecedented halting last November of Ant Group’s initial public offering, slated to be the world’s largest at $39.5 billion. This year, Xi has wiped more than $140 billion of value off U.S.-listed Chinese tech giants during the last week of July alone, and most analysts believe the carnage will continue.
China, as a result, is needy, requiring foreign cash to replace what has already been lost—and what will be lost as Xi continues to take apart his tech giants. Biden can use his considerable powers under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977—or, if he is even bolder, the Trading with Enemy Act of 1917—to halt commerce with China and investment into the Chinese markets, ending once and for all the China threat.
Once again, China’s regime went out of its way to insult Biden administration diplomats.The mauling this time took place in the Chinese city of Tianjin, on July 26. Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman, the most senior Biden administration official to visit China, was the victim.Beijing used the meeting with Ms. Sherman, as it used the now-infamous March meeting in Anchorage, not to work with the U.S. but to launch a propaganda campaign against Washington.Vice Foreign Minister Xie Feng, for instance, publicly accused the U.S. of trying to end the Chinese regime. “A whole-of-government and whole-of-society campaign is being waged to bring China down,” Xie said, according to the official China Daily, during Sherman’s visit.Xie even went so far as to hand Sherman two lists, containing what were portrayed as Beijing’s demands. “China has for the first time given the U.S. a list of red lines and remedial action it must take to repair relations,” Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post reported.Xie did not let up after Sherman departed Chinese soil. Days later he was issuing additional hostile comments, including one posted on the website of China’s embassy in the U.S. “It is,” Xie stated, “the United States, not anybody else, who is the inventor, and patent and intellectual property owner of coercive diplomacy.”
This propaganda blast mirrored the one that immediately followed the mid-March meeting in Anchorage, where China’s Yang Jiechi, China’s top diplomat, and Foreign Minister Wang Yi met Secretary of State Antony Blinken and National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan. Just moments after the first day of that tense encounter, Beijing issued statements inciting, among other things, hatred against America and a global race war against white people, some of its most vicious propaganda in the post-Mao history of the People’s Republic.
It was no accident that Xie was chosen for the task of taking on Sherman. Beijing had first offered the American diplomat, then about to embark on a trip to Japan, South Korea, and Mongolia, a meeting with him, the No. 5 in the foreign ministry. State scrubbed a stopover in China over the intended slight to Sherman, America’s No. 2 diplomat. The U.S. side agreed to a meeting in China only after Beijing offered a sit-down with Foreign Minister Wang, the regime’s No. 2 diplomat and Sherman’s counterpart.
Sherman in fact met Wang, but Beijing afterwards omitted this crucial fact in its propaganda releases, reporting only that Sherman met Xie Feng. The slight mirrored Beijing’s attempt to insult U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin earlier this year. The Chinese regime evidently thinks it is open season on senior American officials.
We should not be surprised. “I’ve heard presidents of both political parties say complimentary things about the leader of China,” Trey Gowdy said on his new Fox News Channel show in July. “Are we sending the right message? I mean if we really believe China is responsible for COVID-19 and stealing intellectual property and aggression in the South China Sea, are we sending the right message to them?”
No, Washington is most certainly not. The generous messages American presidents send to Beijing are obviously counterproductive. That messaging, for instance, has led China’s leaders, who are critically reliant on the United States, to believe they hold the high cards.
President Joe Biden in particular is guilty of needlessly giving the Chinese leverage. “Chinese leaders give the impression that the U.S.A. has much more to seek from them than they from Washington,” said Yogesh Gupta, former Indian diplomat and specialist on China-India relations, to Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post, referring to the Sherman meeting. “This time, the Americans were on the defensive as they sought Beijing’s cooperation on a range of issues—climate change, North Korea, Iran, Afghanistan, and others—ensuring that the U.S.A. did not seek conflict.”
Article posted with permission from Pamela Geller
Become an insider!
Sign up to get breaking alerts from Sons of Liberty Media.