“Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ribonucleic acid (SARS-CoV-2 RNA) in a clinical specimen using a molecular amplification detection test.”
The test referred to is the PCR. And as you can plainly see, it is detecting, not the virus itself, but a piece of RNA.
A piece of RNA ASSUMED to come from the virus, SARS-CoV-2.
I say ASSUMED because, where is the actual virus? Where is the virus isolated from all surrounding material?
If you don’t have the virus, you can’t say, with any degree of certainty at all, that you have a piece of it (the RNA).
As I’ve described many times, “isolated” is a term that is tortured by researchers and public health officials, so that it means just the opposite of what it is supposed to mean.
Numerous studies that claim the virus has been isolated actually turn out to mean: “We have the virus in a soup in a dish in the lab. The soup contains various types of animal and humans cells, toxic chemicals and drugs, and other genetic material. The virus is completely surrounded, but it is there. We know this, because some of the cells are dying, and this dying must be the result of infection with the virus…”
This argument not only turns the definition of “isolation” on its head, it reveals, upon a moment’s consideration, that the dying of the cells could come from the action of the toxic chemicals and drugs; and on top of that, the cells are being starved of nutrients, so they could be dying as a result of that deprivation.
Therefore, to say “the virus must be in the soup in the dish in the lab” because is killing cells…well, that’s completely unproven, and therefore…
There is no reason under the sun to claim that the virus is there in the soup at all.
Hence, the claim that the PCR test is detecting a piece of RNA from the virus is unwarranted. Because, again…where is the virus? Where is the truly isolated virus?
Nowhere.
And on that basis alone, the PCR test is irrelevant, useless, and deceptive.
It is set up to look for and detect a piece of RNA material that has never been proved to come from this un-isolated phantom ASSUMPTION, called “SARS-CoV-2.”
A few more moments of clear thought, and you realize the whole string of “science” that leads to the lockdowns and the economic devastation is not science at all.
It is what is called, in the intelligence community, a cover story. A story launched to justify crimes.
In this case, capital crimes against humanity.
Remember, this is the same CDC that has never even isolated the alleged “virus” and that most of the CONvid cases were those that wore masks.
Sign up to get breaking alerts from Sons of Liberty Media.
Don't forget to like SonsOfLibertyMedia.com on Facebook and Twitter. The opinions expressed in each article are the opinions of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect those of SonsOfLibertyMedia.com.
At SonsOfLibertyMedia.com, we strive for accuracy in our articles. If, at any time, you see something that needs updating or correction, please click the contact link at the top of the page and advise of correction with a link to the article you are referencing. Thank you.
Parler
If You Believe The PCR Test Detects An Actual Virus, You’re Wrong
Written by: Tim Brown
Published on: December 25, 2020
Not only do we have the PCR test’s developer, Dr. Kary Mullis, stating that you can find anything you want to find with the PCR test that isn’t present, but now, former CBS Healthwatch reporter and author of The Matrix Revealed Jon Rappoport points to the Center for Disease Control’s own documents to show the deception about what the test actually is picking up, and it’s not the SARS-CoV-2 virus, but a piece of RNA.
Rappoport writes:
In a CDC document titled, “Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) 2020 Interim Case Definition, Approved April 5, 2020,” under the section, “Laboratory Criteria,” we have this:
“Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ribonucleic acid (SARS-CoV-2 RNA) in a clinical specimen using a molecular amplification detection test.”
The test referred to is the PCR. And as you can plainly see, it is detecting, not the virus itself, but a piece of RNA.
A piece of RNA ASSUMED to come from the virus, SARS-CoV-2.
I say ASSUMED because, where is the actual virus? Where is the virus isolated from all surrounding material?
If you don’t have the virus, you can’t say, with any degree of certainty at all, that you have a piece of it (the RNA).
As I’ve described many times, “isolated” is a term that is tortured by researchers and public health officials, so that it means just the opposite of what it is supposed to mean.
Numerous studies that claim the virus has been isolated actually turn out to mean: “We have the virus in a soup in a dish in the lab. The soup contains various types of animal and humans cells, toxic chemicals and drugs, and other genetic material. The virus is completely surrounded, but it is there. We know this, because some of the cells are dying, and this dying must be the result of infection with the virus…”
This argument not only turns the definition of “isolation” on its head, it reveals, upon a moment’s consideration, that the dying of the cells could come from the action of the toxic chemicals and drugs; and on top of that, the cells are being starved of nutrients, so they could be dying as a result of that deprivation.
Therefore, to say “the virus must be in the soup in the dish in the lab” because is killing cells…well, that’s completely unproven, and therefore…
There is no reason under the sun to claim that the virus is there in the soup at all.
Hence, the claim that the PCR test is detecting a piece of RNA from the virus is unwarranted. Because, again…where is the virus? Where is the truly isolated virus?
Nowhere.
And on that basis alone, the PCR test is irrelevant, useless, and deceptive.
It is set up to look for and detect a piece of RNA material that has never been proved to come from this un-isolated phantom ASSUMPTION, called “SARS-CoV-2.”
A few more moments of clear thought, and you realize the whole string of “science” that leads to the lockdowns and the economic devastation is not science at all.
It is what is called, in the intelligence community, a cover story. A story launched to justify crimes.
In this case, capital crimes against humanity.
Remember, this is the same CDC that has never even isolated the alleged “virus” and that most of the CONvid cases were those that wore masks.
The CDC and WHO have not only worked as propaganda outlets for the virus, but also for the goal, which is the vaccine.
Now, you know.
Become an insider!
Sign up to get breaking alerts from Sons of Liberty Media.
WHO Deletes Naturally Acquired Immunity From Its Website Next Post:
Legal Team Sues Mike Pence – Demands He Reject Unconstitutional Electoral College Slates
About the Author: Tim Brown
Trending on The Sons of Liberty Media
Dr Vernon Coleman Warns Of “Brand New Novel Flu Vaccine”: ‘Something very dangerous is going to happen with the new Flu Jab’ (Video)
Dr Lee Merritt: The Twin Scams Of 1918 & 2020 (Video)
99 Relatable Things That Only Preppers Will Understand
Pharmacist Tells Father Of 7-Year-Old With Myocraditis: We Don’t Warn Parents About This – “We Might Scare The Parents & The Don’t Get Their Child Vaccinated” (Video)
You Won’t Believe What This Store Owner Used To Take Out 1 Of 3 Robbers – All Caught On Surveillance Video
Now They Are Literally Bowing Down & Worshipping Baal Right In Front Of Our Eyes (Video)
Instead Of 0 Over 30 Years, Fourteen Canadian Doctors Have Died In The Past 14 Months After Taking The Experimental CONvid Shot