And if you think this is only our view, last year it was reported on how Jim Dawson, the founder of the counter-jihad organization, Britain First —
who witnessed the takeover of the movement, which he founded as a Christian organization — uncovered a major plot to cause a violent civil war in Great Britain, being devised by Alan Ayling, EDL founder, Tommy Robinson, alongside anti-Catholic activist Anne Marie Waters, and major British elites, Malcom Pearson, former leader of UKIP, and the baroness, Caroline Cox, who is a strong advocate for Christian Zionism and a member of the House of Lords.
Jim Dawson recounted the meeting:
For some time I had been courted by ‘Tommy Robinson’ EX EDL re a new project that he was to be involved with when he came off licence. He and some others named as an, Anne Marie Waters, Lord Pearson and Barroness Cox where to set up and promote a ‘Sharia Watch’ organisation and were looking for me to provide the skills to enable successful fundraising, administration, merchandising and web presence similar to what I had done for the BNP and Britain First in the past. As a result of several conversations I was invited over to meet the interested parties and that was on the dates above.
“There was actually two meetings that took place on Thursday the 11th of June 2015 in the village of Great Offley . The first meeting was in the Green Man pub, beer garden at around 4pm where Mr Robinson arrived with a man I know to be called ‘Dave Allport’ who introduced himself as an expert on extremism and was very friendly with Mr Lennon. I had the impression they were both singing from the same hymn sheet.
Also present were Paul Golding and Jayda Francen from the Political party Britain First and several security personnel also from Britain First and one other, an man who was there to observe at my request . This meeting was really one about Tommy and Paul and I was not really involved in any serious discussions.
As this meeting concluded Mr Robinson confirmed with me of our meeting later that evening and said that Anne Marie Waters would be present and Alan Ayling also would be there. This was arranged to be held down the road in the Red Lion Hotel at 7.30pm. No Britain First people were invited.
The second meeting in the red Lion was attended by myself, Ayling, Robinson and I had a person ‘observing’ from nearby. They initially explained what they desired from me regarding the new organisation, which Anne Marie described as “ EDL with membership”
I explained it would take at least £10,000 to start this project . Robinson suggested I get a cut of the profits, However, I pointed out the considerable costs involved and I would have to pay my people up front but after this initial investment a cut would be fine. Then Mr Ayling said that once this was up and running they had American ‘heavy hitters’ who would back the project, this was reiterated by Mr Robinson.”
…“As the meeting progressed I was interested in how they would attract a following given that the ‘right-wing’ anti Islam ‘market was rather crowded and Britain First had almost a monopoly on the scene. It was then the issue of cartoons was brought up.
Anne Marie Waters outlined her idea of a Mohammed Cartoon competition. It was also muted by the others that the displaying of cartoons should occur in towns and cities with large muslin communities both here in Britain and possibly in Europe. Robinson and Ayling both contributed to this discussion.
However, it seemed to me that Ms Waters was very much the driving force in this enterprise. As the conversation progressed it became apparent that this idea was, as far as I was concerned, extremely dangerous and ill conceived. I was becoming aware of the true intent of the whole operation and was seriously concerned at what I was hearing.
It became very obvious that the intent was to use the pretence of ‘freedom of speech’ to ferment a backlash from the Muslim community. This was not an opinion formulated by me but rather a conclusion based on statements from all three participants.
I pointed out that such a ‘stunt’ would definitely ignite the fires of a civil war and this had the potential to result in the deaths of thousands of innocent people. During the conversation I asked Ms Water directly if it was a fair thing to mock any religious figure, Mohammed, Jesus Christ, Or the Virgin Mary as I, as a Christian found the deliberate mocking of my religion as a very annoying thing. She responded tersely that “she would do what she liked, whenever she wanted as it’s a fee country and it’s her right” I found this statement and the attitude to be at best rather juvenile and maybe even foolhardy.”
Alan Ayling and Tommy Robinson both stated that it was necessary to spark offa Northern Ireland style conflict with the Muslim community according to Downson
“At this stage in the conversation both Ayling and Mr Robinson interjected with comments regarding the necessity to ‘spark’ off a conflict as demographically it was better it happen now than in 20 years time when it would be too late.
Again I pressed as to whether they fully understood the implications of what they were saying and apparently they did. I explained the realities of the horrors that I lived through during the Ulster conflict and again this was seen as a sort of model for the overall plan as they were convinced that once the spark was ignited, that “there were enough Jihadists, gangsters and drug dealers with arms in the Muslim community to start a war”.
They believed that then in this scenario thousands of British people especially ex military folk would be drawn into an Northern Ireland like conflict and their organisation would be in a position to harness the people into some kind of structure and resistance movement.
Counter-jihadism is being used by eugenist elitists as a front to cover up their own motives of race war and mass slaughter and tyranny. The trap and the concoction is weaved so well, that anyone who goes against it will be accused of supporting Islam. This is exactly what happened to Shoebat.com when David Horowitz’s Freedom Center, Jihad Watch and Pamela Geller, declared that we have “joined the Jihad” for simply exposing Briebart’s Milo Yiannopoulos’ sodomite supremacist agenda within the counter-jihad. This conspiracy was further revealed by our colleague, Andrew Bieszad.
Similar to Jim Dawson’s experience, Bieszad was invited to speak at an event for American Renaissance, the central organization for the Alt-Right, a supporter of the nazi AfD, eugenics and Social-Darwinism, whose membership is filled with Jewish eugenists. On their website they even say: “Galton was also correct in perceiving that eugenics is the solution to the problem.” The same organization says:
“Eugenics is the obvious solution, but it is notoriously difficult to accomplish. If we in the West do not have the will to stop dysgenic reproduction or dysgenic immigration, Prof. Lynn predicts “the torch of civilization will pass from the Europeans to the Chinese.”
Bieszad did not know the evils of American Renaissance, he simply thought it was an event to expose Islam. What he saw shocked him, as it revealed that the counter-jihad narrative was simply being used as a front by the organization to further advance Nazism and race war. I interviewed Andrew Bieszad about this experience:
What is dangerous is how evil people are venerated simply because they are “against Islam.” One can be for Nazism, infanticide, euthanasia and homosexuality, and still they will be praised because they are “fighting Islam.” I especially find it interesting how people will act as though a particular “counter-jihadist” is some “final hope” or “bulwark” for Western civilization. Its quite a weak position, and one that emanates from an absence of convictions.
You have entire peoples in Europe who say that Christianity is the solution to the West’s problems, but they will not accept such affirmations, they want to indulge and tolerate evil, they want abortion, homosexuality and degeneracy. It is not a war between “the west and Islam,” between “secularism and Islam,” between “modern society and Islam.” As Jospeh de Maistre wrote, “it is the fight to the death between Christianity and philosophism.” It is a war between good and evil. The holy Scriptures do not say that Christ came to destroy Islam, but “that he might destroy the works of the devil.” (1 John 3:8)
These types of people think its edgy or courageous to come out and say, “Islam is not a religion of peace!” The era of it requiring some fortitude to declare that Islam is not a religion of peace is over; it began dying on 9/11, and has since finally perished with the huge media attention on ISIS’ videos of blood, gore and carnage. It really means nothing in regards to one’s moral fortitude if they say that Islam is not peaceful. Such words are being used to tout sacrilege, in the face of the masses who are angered at Islam and Muslim immigration. The anger against Muslims is growing so much, that the passions and emotions of the people are being enthralled and leveraged towards the ideological objectives of tyrants and debauched reprobates.
The immigration crises in Germany is not an invasion, it is an invitation for societalmanipulation, to push the country to accept despotism. Political elites wanted the refugees, to cause enough chaos to push the people to be in favor for totalitarianism. Europe should have never brought the refugees. Yes. But, they did. And the question is why? As I have said before, when Merkel became chancellor of Germany, she had always played the anti-multiculturalism card, affirming that German multiculturalism has “utterly failed.” All of a sudden, she became for multiculturalism, being in support for the absorption of a million or so Muslim refugees, to the words of “wir shaffen das” (“we will manage”).
Put her words against multiculturalism against her own actions, and it becomes obvious that the woman knew very well that the repercussions were going to be disastrous. The whole of the German government knew what destructive consequences were going to transpire. It is very conspicuous that the reasoning behind the absorption of refugees was not compassion, but a political agenda.
The agenda is societal manipulation: to cause anger, mass rage and frustration, to the point that the people will throw out all historical and political taboos, and look to up to people of supremacist and fascist ideology as the solution. Now Angela Merkel is sayingthat the refugee situation became out of her control:
“For some time, we didn’t have enough control… No one wants a repeat of last year’s situation, including me.”
Once Germany had enough of its quota of refugees necessary — in accordance to the agreement with Neo-Ottoman Turkey — for the second phase of transforming the country, now she is against the immigration plan. She knew what was going to happen. Its as if the powers that be wanted this to happen, so that they could create the problem and then make themselves to be the solution.
This is part of a conspiracy done between Germany and Turkey. The Germans made an agreement with Turkey to take in the refugees, knowing full well that it would change the political conditions of their nation, in order to pave the way to a totalitarian fourth reich, and for a future nazi alliance with a revived Ottoman Empire.
It is not really against Islam that these people have their fight, but rather, it is against Europe itself. What made civilization in Europe, what made it go beyond savagery and enter the realm of virtue, was Christianity. And the calculative and sinister forces amongst us, who claim to be for “Western values,” are advancing disorder, are warring against the Faith that made Europe beautiful. They actually want to take us to a dark age, one reminiscent to pre-Christian times, where homosexuality, violence and sadism are an intricate part of society.
If the AfD, or some other people like it, ever take power over Germany, they will make alliances with the very people they are claiming to be against — the Muslims, specifically the Ottomans, and Eastern European Muslims like the Albanians (as they did against the Serbs in the 90s) — and they will make war with the very people they claim to defend: Europeans. This can be done through a peace treaty after turmoil and also through argumentation that there are “white Muslims” like those in Turkey and Eastern Europeans. Hitler did this with the Japanese; while seeing them as inferior, the Nazis nonetheless called them honorary Aryans. They also did this with the Grand Mufti, Haj Amin al-Husseini, with whom they made the Muslims SS Handjar Division. The Germans did this before, when they trained Muslim Albanians and Bosnians for their SS divisions, why would they not do this again?
Like the Nazis before them, the AfD is already expressing hatred against Catholic and Orthodox, Southern Europeans. The AfD’s federal spokesman and co-leader, Joerg Meuthen, said:
“We [Germany] can have a common currency with the Netherlands, Austria, Finland or Baltic states. They have similar cultures of stability like ours, but the French have a different one, not to mention the Italians, Spaniards, Portuguese and Greeks. They don’t want austerity at all.”
I thought it was about Islam? Why the attack all of a sudden on Southern European countries? I believe that this organization, and this way of thinking, when it takes power, will eventually turn against Catholics and Orthodox Christians. It is not surprising, that already the bulk of the voters in favor of AfD are Protestants and the irreligious, while the number of Catholics in support for this political party are very small, as we read in one German report.
They are first starting incrementally, slowly introducing terms that are known to be National Socialist in nature, while claiming that there is nothing wrong with doing this. For example, the AfD leader, Frauke Petry, loves to use the Nazi term, “voelkisch,” a phrase utilized by the Nazis when referring to the “people’s” or “national.” It was used by the Nazis to distinguish the German people from the Jews and anyone else deemed “racially inferior.”
The Nazi propaganda newspaper, Volkischer Beobachter (“People’s Observer”), heavily promoted the concept. In 2009, German authorities began confiscating copies of the Nazi newspaper after the the publication, Zeitungszuegen (“Newspaper Witnesses”), began making reprints of it. Frauke Petry defended the term, saying that “voelkisch” does not signify any racism, and that “we should work to restore a positive connotation to this concept”.
German journalist Kai Biermann wrote this warning in regards to this issue:
“’Voelkisch’ is not just any adjective … Voelkischer Beobachter was the strongest Nazi daily in terms of circulation, it was the Nazis’ campaign sheet … The term ‘voelkisch’ is a synonym for extreme nationalism and even for racism. To this day it is a symbol of Nazism and its ideology of eradicating and killing anything non-German”
Nazism is going to retake Germany, and it will be thanks to refugees — absorbed in by European elitists — stirring anger amongst the populace to the point that they will accept despotism as the solution. This acceptance of totalitarianism will further divide Europe and spark major fragmentation and division that will be filled with violence and bloodshed, under the hands of the Germans and their allies — the Muslims and others (I believe Croatia will side with Germany) — and who will be watching? The Ne0-Ottoman Empire. The revived Ottoman Empire will ally with Germany in its war with Christendom, but I believe that it will first wait for this massive division and breaking down of Europe before it strikes. In a prophecy made by St. Francis of Paula in 1508, it says:
In Germany begins a dance
Which passeth through Italy
Spain and France
The war will begin in Germany, the evil will start there and it will cause a cataclysmic torrent of violence that will spread throughout Europe. The French may ally with Germany initially, but it will eventually side with its Catholic brothers, especially with the nations of the South — Spain, Portugal, Italy, etc. — and it will prevail. This is in accordance with the prophecy of St. Paula in which she spoke of France as “the nation between the Rhine and the North Sea,”
“The people of the peninsula of Europe will suffer by needless wars until the Holy Man comes. The Lion will come from a high mountain in the enlightened nation. Then will the people of the half-moon of the tribe of Agar overrun many nations towards midnight and commit many atrocities. They will stay three years destroying everything. Yet, in the third year, will one of the unconquerable Eagles who reigns over the enlightened nation between the Rhine and the North sea, with a great army meet them by the mouth of the River Rhine and, in a fearful battle, almost entirely annihilate them.” (Click here to read further interpretation on this)
Notice what she says: at first war will devastate Europe, and then will the Muslims make their attack. The Germans divided Europe through the Protestant Reformation, and the Muslims struck. The conflict of Protestantism would have easily been taken care of, “had it not been that political authority over the Germans,” writes Belloc, “already badly weakened and divided, suffered sudden menace in the very quick of the business from the great Mohammadan victory on Mohacs Field.” The German Luther, and the other reformers, caused the division, the Muslims capitalized on the chaos, and the factionalism in Europe was perpetuated. Germany today is causing another reformation, with the help of the proto-protestants — the Muslims — alongside German Lutherans, and this will divide Europe, foster back German tyranny, and the bloodbath will be perpetuated from an attack by the Ottomans.
*Special thanks to Rudy for helping with German translation.
Article reposted with permission from Shoebat.com