My mother was a nurse in London in the 1960s, where respiratory illness was prevalent amid the industrial pollution of the day. The hospital wards would be filled with patients in tents, meticulously maintained and cleaned to avoid infection by the regimented and strict battalions of nurses. Woe betide anyone who stood up the matrons of the day. Those fearsome custodians of good practice were there to enforce rules that saved lives — or so they believed. However, that trusting medical orthodoxy of the time did not dare question the wisdom of placing patients under plastic bags, with the result that many would have died of asphyxiation, as witnessed by my mother. Noticeably absent was also an outcry and public exposure of this widespread malpractice. At some point, someone realized that the tents were killing people, and they came down quietly and suddenly, never to be mentioned again.
When we talk about modern medicine, we are actually referring to a medical industrial complex that relies on pharmaceutical and machined-based interventions, which are funded either through taxpayers or private insurance schemes. The scientific orthodoxies adhered to, of course, emanate from medical schools. But who funds the medical schools and what are their agendas?
For those of us who have been paid to investigate and question public narratives, the issue of vaccine efficacy and its widespread implementation is open to question. How many of the doctors who prescribe these “inoculations” actually go through the empirical data and fully read the published reports?
It would be unwise to assume that the media would have exposed any malpractice or sinister agendas in the medical field by now. The last expose that I recall from a newspaper that I worked for happened under an editor called Harold Evans at the Sunday Times in London — who brought to light the thalidomide scandal in 1972, where pregnant women in 46 countries took the tranquilizer pill that was said to have no side-effects, but which caused 8,000 babies to be born with terrible deformities.
The emerging Covid-19 schematic throws up several anomalies and discussion points: is the testing accurate? Is there an agenda to destabilize societies and institute more draconian social controls? is the US election cycle a factor in a larger plan to create chaos and unemployment to discredit the sitting US President? Why is there such blatant and blanket censure of opinions that challenge or question the official narratives? Why would social media giants risk their very existence by employing algorithmic AI bias to deplatform dissenters or deep thinkers?
Social media is peppered with smartphone footage of empty hospital wards and listless nurses and doctors. More hospital staff are coming forward each day to describe both the empty beds and in some cases the suspect protocols being administered to patients who are admitted with Covid-19 symptoms — or not, as the cases may be. In the UK, homes and gardens are regaled with rainbow backed slogans saying “Thank you NHS!” in a homage to the nationalized healthcare system that was established after the second world war. It would not be an exaggeration to suggest that the British health system commands a cult status among many people. The impulse to “get behind the NHS” is perhaps derived from the war-time spirit of “pulling together to defeat the common enemy” — at that time the Nazis, who had their own collective notions around social welfare and health.
Even a cursory glance at the characters who formed the inner core of Germany’s Third Reich administration under Adolf Hitler reveals eccentric, angry and ego-driven maniacs who managed to institute rapid and dramatic social change and industrial rectification. This esoteric and ambitious cabal oversaw a cadre of brilliant military officers, architects and administrators who were put to work under the umbrella of National Socialism. The propaganda and medical ministries were integral to that program and had the full weight of the Nazi machine behind them. We all know that the Nazis were the “bad guys”, because Hollywood keeps telling us so; but how many ambitious careerists out there secretly admire what was achieved under that brief social movement? And how many of their kin were integrated into America’s post-war military industrial complex? If there is any truth in claims around “Operation Paperclip” — where 1,600 German scientists, engineers and technicians were taken to the US — then perhaps the same process applied to the industrial medical field, where eugenics and mass chemical dosing were cornerstones of the fascist world view.
If all this craziness disturbs you, then perhaps shift your perspective to one of a character in a play, where you have a part to play and, the opportunity, or silver lining, may be that you are forced to go inward, to find the core of your being, where the truth that resides in your heart supersedes the more vapid musings of the ego. And once you do reconnect with that more authentic self you are better able to gauge and operate in a world of mixed messages and illusions.
Bill Gates, the Microsoft-founder-turned-philanthropist, has faced controversy in the so-called developing world after instituting mass polio vaccination programs that reportedly caused paralysis among some Indian children. As Big Pharma outlets rush to develop a Covid-19 vaccine, Gates has stated that you will need “multiple doses” for it to be effective. I will not spend exhaustive amounts of time on the scientific merits or fallacies and contradictions surrounding vaccine claims, which are covered in other articles here.
As perplexing as the rationale might be for the roll-out of mass medications that contain ingredients you wouldn’t put individually on your body, never mind in it, are the legislative responses from mayors and other community leaders around the world. A night-time curfew just introduced in Victoria, Australia, by premiere Dan Andrews seems to create a linkage to the virus’s reported origin among bats. Is he suggesting that the bats might have travelled to his state and are stalking the streets by night? As of this week, Melbourne is in lockdown, based on a death rate of 200 people over five months.
This is as much a battle for hearts and minds as it is for physical health or freedom. Amid the mixed messages and fearmongering by politicians and the media come enigmatic and potentially loaded remarks by US President Donald Trump. In a tweet dated July 21, Trump referred to the “invisible China Virus”. In the recent past, he has mentioned the Spanish Flu being in “1917” while discussing the current pandemic. The so-called Spanish Flu ravaged the world in 1918, and yet he posits it being from the previous year. When both remarks are considered, could he be using subtext to point to Marxist uprisings of then and now; where disease, or the fear of it, is used as a method of control?
If the reports by physicians around the world about hydroxychloroquine are to be believed, then a safe, fast and inexpensive treatment is already available.
As I write this article in my favorite cafe, a long line of people are waiting to order lunch. Almost everyone is wearing some kind of facial covering — some have surgical masks; others with trendy patterned materials; one man has what resembles a diaper; while another has a black mask over his chin but not his nose. Laurel and Hardy would not look out of place in this tragi-comic story.
I spent years trying to pluck up the courage to join female Japanese tourists with their Burberry facial attire while traveling on dusty subways, but never broke through the social stigma of being a man in a suit with a dust mask on. Taking to a bike as a commuter in congested cities finally provided the justification for facial particulate filters and eyewear. Now, as a rurally based pedestrian, I am the one shunning them, but still drawing the angry glances. The amount of irony in life must surely alert us to a scriptwriter up somewhere above the firmament.
The comedic, or sadistic, suggestion by a senior US health official this week that people should also wear goggles only adds to the sense of incredulity and absurdity of this whole campaign. Someone somewhere is taking pleasure in manipulating the “useless eaters”, to paraphrase Henry Kissinger, and making them do things that are humiliating and illogical.
All this over a virus that has a 98.6 percent recovery rate.
Alternatively, or concurrently there may be other forces at work and plans in motion. Reading between the lines and using some of the clues discussed above, we may be partaking in an operation by benevolent actors within the US and other administrations, whereby we are allowed to perceive the mechanisms of our enslavement by the corporate and globalist machine. This would mean that the sooner we wake up to the harsh reality, which would date back decades or centuries, the sooner we are released from the game, and our bondage.
The archetypal story of Jesus the Nazarene was that he arrived on the scene of barbaric Judea, under the auspices of the imperial Roman Empire, and proceeded to inform the population of their servitude to false gods and despotic leaders. That same empire very quickly nailed him to a cross, and even the grateful and wisened populace could or would do little to save him. Some two thousand years later, maybe the benevolent actors in our midst are playing it safe with the masses and their imperial corporate leaders, hoping to avoid summary execution before they can lift the veil of ignorance for us. The symbolism of that Roman empire still abounds in the global and national organizations that propose to direct our lives; just look at the motifs for the World Health Organization and the United Nations. And then look at the funding streams from private individuals — Bill Gates being among them. Gates says getting vaccinated is not your choice; that line could have come out the mouth of Nero or Caligula. In retrospect, few would disagree that most of these emperors were neurotic, narcissistic and sociopathic. Power corrupts — and the mentally ill project their flaws onto everyone else. All hail Emperor Gates — or so he would have us think.
The projected display of mass neurosis in the media and government departments is taking effect among some members of the public, who are obviously unable or unwilling to question the variable edicts from their authority figures. Citizens without masks in stores or in the streets are being accosted and verbally abused, as if this perceived civil disobedience threatened their grip on reality. The phrase “Covid Karens” has come to describe the hysterics displayed by women in particular around contraventions of the emerging social mores. Judging by George Orwell’s remarks in his book, “1984”, such socially engineered responses were recognized during previous communist-style regimes. “It was always the women … who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy,” he wrote in 1949.
It seems that power also confers immunity or protection from malevolent viruses, as demonstrated by Washington mayor Muriel Bower, who has exempted herself, state and federal employees from mask mandates that apply to everyone else. The imperative to wear masks – a preamble for mass vaccinations – is not on a scientific basis, but rather a political one.
If the frontline doctors across the world who are successfully treating the Chinese virus with hydroxychloroquine are being censured and attacked by the establishment, then it makes a mockery of allopathic health systems, governments and the media. Dr Vladimir Zelenko, an MD at Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Buffalo, told America’s Voice that “Dr. [Anthony] Fauci [director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases] and the forces that he represents do not want hydroxychloroquine to have an emergency use authorization because the drugs, Remdesivir and the vaccines can’t by FDA internal standards get an emergency use authorization. There’s a hundred and fifty thousand dead Americans because people like Dr. Fauci are attempting to push through drugs like Remdesivir and vaccines because those are the money-making drugs —and not the drug that costs 50 cents a pill.”
The clampdown on alternative treatments continued last week when a video of a press conference in Washington held by a group of doctors touting HCQ went viral on social media. The response by Facebook and Twitter was swift, with both platforms scrubbing the videos, claiming the information was false and misleading.
Scientists at a recently exposed World Health Organization conference stated that vaccines were never proven or adequately tested for long-term effects as scientists. Robert F. Kennedy Jnr, in a debate with Alan Dershowitz last month, highlighted misleading information around the safety of a rushed Covid vaccine. Dershowitz, a Harvard law professor, advocates mandatory vaccination, by force if necessary.
“They use what they call exclusionary criteria,” said Kennedy, who is chairman of the Children’s Health Defense organization. “They are only giving these vaccines in these tests that they’re doing to the healthiest people.” Kennedy continued, “If you look at their exclusionary idea criteria: You cannot be pregnant, you cannot be overweight, you must have never smoked a cigarette, you must have never vaped, you must have no respiratory problems in your family, you can’t suffer asthma, you can’t have diabetes, you can’t have rheumatoid arthritis or any autoimmune disease. There has to be no history of seizure in the family. These are the people they’re testing the vaccine on.
“Despite all that, in the low-dose group, 6 percent had to be hospitalized, while in the high-dose group 21 percent required hospitalization. The people they tested are not typical Americans. So, what’s going to happen when they give this to average people? They’ve already said that the first people who get this are going to be people at risk, the elderly, people with co-morbidities,” said Kennedy.
“Any other medicine that had that kind of profile in its original Phase 1 study would be D.O.A. The problem is Anthony Fauci put $500 million of our dollars into that vaccine. He owns half the patent. He has five guys working for him entitled to collect royalties from that. So you have a corrupt system and now they’ve got a vaccine that’s too big to fail,” Kennedy concluded.
Amid an avalanche of propaganda and widespread censorship over the Covid-19 pandemic, Yale University has turned to psychological strategies that would make Vance Packard, author of “The Hidden Persuaders”, blush — in an attempt to corral the US populace into accepting a vaccine solution to the coronavirus.
The study, published on ClinicalTrials.gov, explores techniques and messages that could be deployed to persuade citizens to accept blanket Covid-19 jabs. The report outlines shame and anger virtue signaling statements, covering a range of headings such as “guilt”, “embarrassment”, “anger”, “trust in science”, “control”, “economic benefit”, and “self-interest”.
The clinical trial states, under “guilt”: “1/5 of the sample will be assigned to this message. The message is about the danger that COVID-19 presents to the health of one’s family and community. The best way to protect them is by getting vaccinated and society must work together to get enough people vaccinated. Then it asks the participant to imagine the guilt they will feel if they don’t get vaccinated and spread the disease.”
The “trust in science” narrative states “Vaccination is backed by science. If one doesn’t get vaccinated that means that one doesn’t understand how infections are spread or who ignores science.”
It continues, under “bravery”: “… firefighters, doctors and frontline medical workers are brave. Those who choose not to get vaccinated against COVID-19 are not brave.”
“1/15 of the sample will be assigned to this group, which is a message about how COVID-19 is wreaking havoc on the economy and the only way to strengthen the economy is to work together to get enough people vaccinated,” states a message on economic grounds.
This development bolsters a three-pronged approach by forces that have sought to restrict freedoms and basic human rights through the lockdown scenario, inflated and manipulated statistics on infections and deaths from Covid-19 (as discussed in other articles on Corey’s Digs), and now seek to employ the services of academics to fine tune messages that the corporate media have been unable to present cogently or convincingly.
As far back as January 2017, Fauci was quoted in Healio News, a specialty clinical information website, as saying “There is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases.” Fauci’s “Pandemic Preparedness in the Next Administration” speech was delivered at Georgetown University Medical Center, and included the line, “the thing we’re extraordinarily confident about is that we’re going to see this in the next few years”.
This reporter has been told by several sources that Bill Gates, the most prolific advocate of mass vaccination, was seen in the offices of major newspapers in the US and UK months before the official Covid outbreak. A number of those newspapers subsequently ran editorials backing his vaccine agenda.
It is a curious coincidence that on the same day that Gates, the United Nations and The World Economic Forum held “Event 201”, a pandemic tabletop exercise on October 18, 2019, the Military World games opening ceremony was held in Wuhan, China.
Further supplemental data to support a hypothesis around planned mass medical dosing comes in the form of the Rockefeller Foundation’s “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development report” from 2010.
Harry Vox, an investigative journalist, speaking in 2014 on the “lockstep” scenario, said: “They will stop at nothing to complete their toolkit of control. One of the things that has been missing from the toolkit of total control has been quarantines and curfews… If the ruling class ever saw widespread civil unrest, you would see an Ebola outbreak in America right away… Ebola is a tool. It doesn’t just magically start spreading. It is very possible that one of the NGOs can be used to spread the virus over there [Africa].”
He said the aim of widespread infection was to further the next phase of control. On page 18 of the Rockefeller report, a “lockstep” scenario is outlined where “a world of tighter top-down government control and authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback … in 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s N1H1, this new influenza strain — originating from wild geese — was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked across the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of those healthy young adults. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and global supply chains.” Sound familiar?
Notice how they word these scenarios in the past tense, as if they have already occurred — like some malevolent spell: an agenda to be written down and later read by who — security agencies? Proxy agents? Prime ministers and health authorities?
The “lockstep” entry continues: “… even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers… The pandemic blanketed the planet — though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols. But even in developed countries, containment was a challenge. The United States’ initial policy of ‘strongly discouraging’ citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus, not just within the US but across borders. However, a few countries did fare better — China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than other countries …”
It seems the progenitors of the report admire the Chinese government’s authoritarian capitalism and seek to emulate its efficient methods of control in the West. “China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure,” the report continues. “During the pandemic, national leaders around the world used their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal space like train stations and supermarkets.”
So far, so good: this playbook has been diligently followed by many world leaders during the present pandemic. So, far from being an evolving, organic situation, it was actually spelt out step by step for governments and agencies years ago. Let’s see if they predicted, or dictated, what will happen next…
“Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crisis and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power,” says the report.
And all this for our safety and reassurance. If the world was not apathetic enough, we have Yale assisting with its psychological manipulation techniques and emotionally-charged catch phrases to hook the stragglers and free-thinkers who would dare to question the efficacy and effectiveness of vaccines.
Time to wake up, folks. This is happening in real time — but their crude Madison Avenue slogans won’t work on motivated and informed citizens. The United States was founded on the principles or freedom and choice; don’t throw it away. As we have seen from the draconian lockdowns and mask mandates, your civil liberties are being eroded daily by the elites who have been planning this for generations. Covid Karen and Covid Ken are the least of your worries.
Time to seize the narrative and institute a positive timeline for humanity. This sinister totalitarian vision is no longer a sidelined conspiracy theory, but a development that has already harshly affected most of the world’s population — with this “plandemic” as its cornerstone. We must actively imagine and invest in an alternative future that values personal sovereignty and freedom above narrow vested interests, if it is to be short-circuited and banished into memory. Now is the time to act, in considered but emphatic resolve.
Article posted with permission from Corey Lynn, originally published at CoreysDigs.com
Become an insider!
Sign up to get breaking alerts from Sons of Liberty Media.