Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.


Why Are Some Still Talking Origination Of The Nothing Burger CONvid-1984 Origination?

Written by:

Published on: March 4, 2024

Is there anyone out there who isn’t CONvid weary? No one wants to let go of the biggest global hoax in history. Even so-called alternative media can’t get past the question of the origination of the supposed “virus” that caused the planned scam-demic.

An article on Blaze Media touted that an esteemed biologist has come forward to produce the “smoking gun” that this supposed “virus” originated from China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology and was also engineered by researchers there.

An esteemed molecular biologist has come forward to warn of “smoking gun” evidence that COVID-19 not only originated from China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology, but it was engineered by researchers at the Chinese lab.

Richard H. Ebright, Ph.D., is a molecular biologist at Rutgers University and is on the Board of Governors Professor of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Rutgers University and Laboratory Director at the Waksman Institute of Microbiology. The Harvard Junior Fellow earned the Searle Scholar Award, was named a Johnson & Johnson Discovery Research Fellow, was awarded the Walter J. Johnson Prize, was named Infectious Diseases Society of America Fellow, and took home the National Institutes of Health MERIT Award.

Ebright has also served on the National Institutes of Health Molecular Biology Study Section and National Institutes of Health special emphasis panels.

He has more than 175 publications and more than 40 issued and pending patents.

Sigh. Yawn. Is this man’s “achievements” and recognitions supposed to convince the public that what he says is true? Evidently so, since this is how the article began. Moreover, Elbright continues to repeat information that was “uncovered” years ago.

Ebright is also an outspoken critic of the unchallenged narrative of the origins of the COVID-19 virus. Ebright notes that a document from 2018 points to “smoking gun” evidence that COVID-19 was engineered by researchers at a Chinese lab.

Ebright spotlights a March 2018 grant proposal for experiments called “Project DEFUSE.”

American and Chinese virologists lobbied to receive a $14 million grant from the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, known as DARPA, for funding to engineer bat viruses related to SARS-CoV-1 to examine how they could jump to human transmission.

According to the Wall Street Journal, “The proposal for Project DEFUSE specified that the viruses’ infectivity would be enhanced by inserting into them a genetic element known as a furin cleavage site. Depending on the starting viruses, this protocol could have produced SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, which has a distinctive furin cleavage site.”

The proposal involved Chinese bat researcher Zhengli Shi, EcoHealth Alliance president Peter Daszak, and Ralph Baric – a University of North Carolina professor, who reportedly collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology on “risky bat-virus research” in 2015.

This is nothing that hasn’t been brought forth previously by various sources – one being Dr. David Martin. To prove the CONvid-1984 illness was produced by a “manipulated gain-of-function” altered virus, bring the receipts, which means the original intact virus along with the intact manipulated virus. Why is that not done? Then, bring the receipt that this manipulated virus is transmissible between humans. What is so difficult about that, if this is the case?

No one has done that. We only get talk of “genetic material” in some soup they claim is isolation, when the technique used in this “isolation procedure” contaminates the entire sample. How hard is it when you say you can produce an electron microscope photograph of this “supposed” virus? They can’t produce what they don’t have. But, they can talk about it all day long when they have 175 publications and 40 issued and pending patents without bringing the evidence.

Commentary noted, “The proposal outlines a joint project between Baric’s UNC lab and a team headed by WIV senior scientist Zhengli Shi, the famous ‘Bat Lady’ of the Wuhan lab. The proposal was drafted under the supervision of Peter Daszak — whose EcoHealth Alliance would funnel the hoped-for grant money to the researchers — and was addressed to the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).”

The proposal was ultimately denied by DARPA.

However, Project DEFUSE may have been funded by the Chinese government and executed by researchers at the Wuhan Lab of Virology.

The Washington Times reported, “Nonetheless, speculation persists about whether the research may have proceeded with support from the Chinese government. Project DEFUSE also suggested modifications to bat coronavirus spike proteins, introducing ‘human-specific cleavage sites.’ Notably, these techniques are similar to those some biologists surmise could have played a role in crafting the coronavirus responsible for the global health crisis.”

Nicholas Wade – a former science editor of the New York Times – wrote in the WSJ, “Viruses made according to the DEFUSE protocol could have been available by the time COVID-19 broke out, sometime between August and November 2019. This would account for the otherwise unexplained timing of the pandemic along with its place of origin.”

Dr. Filippa Lentzos – an associate professor of science and international security at King’s College London – has also urged the world to acknowledge that the COVID pandemic may have originated from research by scientists.

“We have to acknowledge the fact that the pandemic could have started from some research-related incident,” Lentzos said in a United Nations speech.

“Are we going to find that out? In my view, I think it’s very unlikely that we will,” she stated. “We need to do better in future. We are going to see more ambiguous events.”

There will be an outbreak, and we won’t know if it’s natural, deliberate, or accidental, and as an international community we need to find ways in which we can investigate that,” Lentzos warned. “For our purposes what is important we need to acknowledge that it could have been, and so what should your responses be.”

And right on cue, the fear porn begins. There is a reason to keep this narrative alive. It is the perfect cover for a scam that was years in the making and the perfect cover for future scams. Then, prime the public with the possibility of another one, indicating no one will know if it is natural, deliberate, or accidental, and issue the solution of an “international community” finding ways to investigate it, and the people, motivated by fear, will follow any edict without question. All the while, these individuals know that investigations will not ever be possible. Not once does anyone ever say anything about stopping this supposed research. Why? It is the mechanism by which they can exact control over the people and produce their bioweapons disguised as medical intervention.

Moreover, people accept, without any proof, what individuals possessing multiple degrees, various achievements, awards, and paper publications say. Then, there is the “authority complex” – believing what someone says because that person is in some position of “authority”. Despite many researchers, laypeople, doctors, and others providing proof of the lack of gold-standard laboratory isolation procedures for supposed viruses, that involve multiple examples of contamination and assumption, people still believe the “authority” instead of the printed proof.

Remember when the public was once told “There is nothing to do for a virus but let it run its course?” We were told to get plenty of rest, drink plenty of fluids, relieve symptoms, and in about 7-10 days, the “virus” would dissipate. What has changed?

In this same Blaze News report, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has issued “new” CONvid-1984 guidelines.

As Blaze News reported on Saturday, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently announced new guidelines regarding COVID-19 that are in stark contrast to previous recommendations by the health agency.

The CDC now says people who test positive for COVID-19 no longer need to quarantine from others for at least five days, advised treating coronavirus in the same manner as the flu, and to gather outside to prevent sickness.

Funny, the CDC is still advising people to “test” using a test that the inventor, Kary Mullis, stated on numerous occasions was for multiplying DNA, not for “testing”. Why is it that people will test, test, and test some more using a test its inventor claims is not a test? People refuse to believe what the inventor says – the inventor knows what he invented does. Instead, they believe an agency that has zero proof of this technique being a “test”, while constantly referring to it as a test. It’s a laboratory technique.

Now, the agency says to treat the CONvid-1984 illness in the same manner as the “flu”. Isn’t that what many said in the beginning? Don’t you just love the “gather outside to prevent sickness” when transmission was never proven? What happened to “wear the mask, even outdoors” garbage? Oh yeah, the agency probably discovered the over 10 mask studies going back to the late 1990s that proved masks made no measurable difference. Social distancing is abandoned as well as the “quarantine” measure. Surprise – not.

It’s time for everyone to get off the CONvid-1984 train regarding origination, and everything else. No one brings the proof, the physical proof, of an isolated intact “original virus” or an isolated intact “manipulated virus”. All anyone ever talks about is “genetic material”. And, these photos taken using electron microscopy showing a spiky round ball is “assumed” to be an intact “virus”, but never do they pluck it off the slide and say, “here it is – intact without being in the contaminated field”. Assumption is NOT a step in the scientific method, ergo, there is no proof of anything. Trying to find the “origination” is like trying to find a unicorn in Central Park. If you can’t prove existence, everything, including transmission, is nonexistent as well.

The “science” of virology is the perfect cover for engineering deadly toxins using the unproven “gain-of-function” research biolabs to which they can then feign release, and use any and every dis-ease symptom to back up the claim. Bake at high fear levels using the Operation Mockingbird lamestream enemedia and you have a casserole ready for the alphabet agencies to dish out to convince the public to take the engineered bioweapon. It is wicked genius at its worst.

As elder family members have always said, “You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make him drink”. Well, it seems someone figured out how to make people drink the lies while rejecting the truth. One would think the people would be choking on that camel about now.

Become an insider!

Sign up to get breaking alerts from Sons of Liberty Media.

Don't forget to like on Facebook and Twitter.
The opinions expressed in each article are the opinions of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect those of

Trending on The Sons of Liberty Media