Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Another Speculation On What The Russian Submarine Was Carrying – A Cobalt Thermonuclear Bomb

Written by:

Published on: July 8, 2019

The speculation continues about what that Russian submarine was doing and even carrying last week when a fire broke out that killed 14 Russian seamen.  With the events that took place in Washington, DC, those at the Kremlin and then the submarine itself, it is widely theorized that all of these events are tied together.  The latest theory is that the Russian submarine was carrying a cobalt thermonuclear bomb.

Of course, we covered the theories that the sub was out to “kill the internet” and possibly engaged a US submarine, torpedoing and sinking it.

First, according to Climateer Investing Blog:

Russian servicemen ‘averted planetary catastrophe’ during nuclear submarine accident, military official claims at funeral…

Kremlin refuses to reveal mission of vessel, citing state secrets.

Second, Barents Observer added in their reporting:

July 2
Fire onboard nuclear-powered submarine, 14 sailors killed

July 3
Fishermen witnessed nuclear submarine drama

July 3
Defense minster confirms fire onboard the «Losharik»

July 4
Report to the President: super-secret submarine «Losharik» will be repaired and taken back in service

The fire started in the battery compartment, but did not affect the reactor, Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu reports to Vladimir Putin…

Tragic, and potentially disastrous for the immediate area if the reactor casing had opened but not something you’d call “a planetary catastrophe”.

Of course, Zero Hedge follows up with some thoughts on a possible bomb the sub was carrying.  Of course, as Tyler Durden writes, take it all with a grain of salt.

The best guess I’ve seen is a high-yield, 100 – 200 megaton, cobalt thermonuclear bomb.

A bomb that size, two to four times more powerful than the biggest ever exploded, the Soviet Tsar Bomba (limited to 50 MT to allow the delivery plane a chance to escape) a bomb that size is awful enough but if it is encased in cobalt it becomes the most lethal munition ever built.

Here’s MIT physicist Max Tegmark at the HuffPo in 2015: Dr. Strangelove Is Back: Say ‘Hi’ to the Cobalt Bomb!

I must confess that, as a physics professor, some of my nightmares are extra geeky. My worst one is the C-bomb, a hydrogen bomb surrounded by large amounts of cobalt. When I first heard about this doomsday device in Stanley Kubrik’s dark nuclear satire Dr. Strangelove, I wasn’t sure if it was physically possible. Now, I unfortunately know better, and it seems like it Russia may be building it.

The idea is terrifyingly simple: Just encase a really powerful H-bomb in massive amounts of cobalt.

When it explodes, it makes the cobalt radioactive and spreads it around the area or the globe, depending on the design. The half-life of the radioactive cobalt produced is about five years, which is long enough to give the fallout plenty of time to settle before it decays and kills, but short enough to produce intense radiation for a lot longer than you’d last in a fallout shelter. There’s almost no upper limit to how much cobalt and explosive power you can put in nukes that are buried for deterrence or transported by sea, and climate simulations have shown how hydrogen bombs can potentially lift fallout high enough to enshroud the globe, so if someone really wanted to risk the extinction of humanity, starting a C-bomb arms race is arguably one of the most promising strategies.

Not that anyone in their right mind would ever do such a thing, I figured back when I first saw the film. Although U.S. General Douglas MacArthur did suggest dropping some small cobalt bombs on the Korean border in the 1950s to deter Chinese troops, his request was denied and, as far as we know, no C-bombs were ever built. I felt relieved that my geeky nightmare was indeed nothing but a bad dream.

It’s not a new idea, The New York Times had a story in 1954,  “Now Most Dreaded Weapon, Cobalt Bomb, Can Be Built” which included this line:

It is this type of hydrogen bomb of which Albert Einstein said: “If successful, radioactive poisoning of the atmosphere, and hence annihilation of any life on earth will have been brought with in the range of technical possibilities.”

More recently, June 14, 2016 The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Volume 72, 2016 – Issue 4: Security at sea, and under it published: Would Russia’s undersea “doomsday drone” carry a cobalt bomb?

Following the November 2015 “leak” of a classified slide purporting to show a Russian nuclear-armed and nuclear-powered drone intended to create long-lasting “zones of extensive radiological contamination,” both Russian and Western observers have suggested that Moscow may be developing a cobalt bomb.

While the underwater detonation of a massive cobalt or “conventional” nuclear weapon might create zones of long-lasting contamination, Russian decision makers would have little confidence that these areas would be in the intended locations, undermining the strategic case for such attacks. These findings suggest that the Kremlin is not pursuing radiological “doomsday bombs,” even though the nuclear-powered drone on the slide seems to be a real research project.

I guess we’re just going to have to wait a couple of weeks to see what all the hoopla was about, and we may have to wait even longer to discover exactly what was going on aboard that sub.

Become an insider!

Sign up to get breaking alerts from Sons of Liberty Media.

Don't forget to like on Facebook and Twitter.
The opinions expressed in each article are the opinions of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect those of

Trending on The Sons of Liberty Media

Newsletter SignupStay up to date on the latest news: Sign up for the Sons of Liberty newsletter!

Stay up to date on the latest news: Sign up for the Sons of Liberty newsletter!