“Our nation is being led astray by ungodly judges, mayors and governors, who are given to change, defying the Constitution and substituting their own wicked agendas.” -Preacher David Wilkerson
Is there a point where you can get so you can now act as if you are above the law? Does education do that?
Does one goes to law school for 7 years and then become a law unto himself that he is to now uphold? This, apparently, is the mindset of reprobate Californian Judge William H. Orrick III (Isaiah 14:14).
NCregister recently reported: “Pre-Trial Victories Come for David Daleiden as He Faces Criminal Prosecution.”
David Daleiden is potentially facing more than a decade in prison as the state of California proceeds with prosecuting him for more than 15 felonies related to his undercover filming of abortion-industry workers.
Undercover pro-life activist David Daleiden faces criminal prosecution in California this September for making undercover videos exposing Planned Parenthood’s sale of fetal body parts.
Recent pre-trial developments have ruled in the 30-year-old Catholic’s favor.
On Monday U.S. district Judge William Orrick said that Daleiden and fellow activist Sandra Merritt can defend their actions as journalism, reported The Washington Times.
The previous week the same judge cut down the amount of Planned Parenthood’s lawsuit, from potentially more than $20 million to less than $100,000.
Daleiden is potentially facing more than a decade in prison as the state of California proceeds with prosecuting him for more than 15 felonies related to his undercover filming of abortion-industry workers at conferences, restaurants and at work in their facilities.
Although the federal courts have halted the release of additional videos by Daleiden’s Center for Medical Progress, those previously released in 2015 show Planned Parenthood officials “haggling” over prices paid by research firms for aborted fetuses and the altering of abortion techniques to produce more “intact specimens” to make them of greater value to those firms.
In one video featuring, Planned Parenthood official Dr. Mary Gatter said the organization could use a “less crunchy technique [than suction abortions] to get more whole specimens.” While asserting that “the money is not the important thing for me,” she went on to joke, “I want a Lamborghini.”
Daleiden and co-filmer Merritt’s 15 criminal felony counts are for non-consensual eavesdropping and conspiracy. The prosecution has been spearheaded by California Attorney General Xavier Becerra and was previously overseen by his predecessor, Kamala Harris, now California’s U.S. senator and a Democratic candidate for president of the United States.
Daleiden has been represented pro bono by the Thomas More Society, a Chicago-based, public-interest law firm, which has thus far unsuccessfully appealed to the California Supreme Court to halt the prosecution.
Peter Breen, one of Daleiden’s attorneys, describes the prosecution as an “unconstitutional harassment of David, bringing charges against him that don’t pass the ‘red face test.
The Thomas More Society contends that Daleiden used standard undercover journalism techniques to uncover wrongdoing by Planned Parenthood.
As Tom Brejcha, another Thomas More Society attorney representing Daleiden explained, “The true aim of these lawsuits brought by Planned Parenthood and the National Abortion Federation (NAF) against Daleiden is not justice, but rather the obstruction of justice. Planned Parenthood and NAF are working to shut down Daleiden’s investigation of the abortion groups’ involvement in baby-parts trafficking.”
Journalists working for mainstream news outlets routinely use similar undercover journalism tactics to ferret out hidden crime, he continued, “so, too, David Daleiden should have the right to penetrate the criminal underworld of America’s abortion providers and report all the evidence he has uncovered of criminal wrongdoing to law enforcement and to members of the public.”
Brejcha gave the example of animal-rights activists filming alleged mistreatment of animals at slaughterhouses and are subsequently applauded by public officials for their work, and he further noted that Daleiden was the first to be prosecuted under California’s anti-eavesdropping laws, suggesting that his prosecution was selective.
Article 3, Section 1 of the US Constitution states: “The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.”
They set during good behavior. I know that many of you have been taught that judges are set for life regardless of their conduct especially when it comes to the Supreme court, but this is not true. There is not one position of government where they are to sit during bad behavior. If they do sit during bad behavior they are then to be removed and charged.
Article 2, Section 4 reads:
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
Article 1, Section 3, Clause 7 reads:
Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.
Instead of this individual discovering the law (Deuteronomy 25:1) and applying the law, he has deceived himself into believing that he is that law just like his father the devil (John 8:44).
He needs to be removed and charged for his crimes against humanity.
Become an insider!
Sign up to get breaking alerts from Sons of Liberty Media.